It would end up doing the concatenations from the second multiclass twice. This occured because SetValue detected a self assignment when trying to set the value of NAME to a VarInit called NAME. NAME is special here and it will get cleaned up later. So add a flag to suppress the self assignment check for this case.
Strangely the self-assignment error was returning false indicating it wasn't an error, but it wasn't doing the right thing. So this also changes it to report an error.
This fixes the names of some AVX512 FMA instructions that showed this double expansion.
llvm-svn: 256725
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
We had not been trying hard enough to resolve def names inside multiclasses
that had complex concatenations, etc. Now we'll try harder.
Patch by Amaury Sechet!
llvm-svn: 237877
This patch was generated by a clang tidy checker that is being open sourced.
The documentation of that checker is the following:
/// The emptiness of a container should be checked using the empty method
/// instead of the size method. It is not guaranteed that size is a
/// constant-time function, and it is generally more efficient and also shows
/// clearer intent to use empty. Furthermore some containers may implement the
/// empty method but not implement the size method. Using empty whenever
/// possible makes it easier to switch to another container in the future.
Patch by Gábor Horváth!
llvm-svn: 226161
Ideally we would store the MultiClasses by value directly in the maps, but I had some trouble with that before and this at least fixes the leak.
llvm-svn: 223997
Upon further review I think the MultiClass is being copied into the map instead of being moved due to the copy constructor on the nested Record type. This ultimately got exposed when the vector in DefPrototype vector was changed to hold unique_ptrs in another commit. This caused gcc 4.7 to fail due to the use of the copy constructor on unique_ptr with the error pointing back to one of the insert calls from this commit. Not sure why clang was able to build.
This reverts commit 710cdf729f84b428bf41aa8d32dbdb35fff79fde.
llvm-svn: 222971
The previous patch had effect, but missed this one. It seems MSVC
gets ADL-confused by the calls where the first argument is a function call?
llvm-svn: 222968
It was failing with this kind of error:
C:\b\build\slave\CrWinClang\build\src\third_party\llvm\lib\TableGen\TGParser.cpp(1243) : error C2668: 'llvm::make_unique' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\b\build\slave\CrWinClang\build\src\third_party\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h(408): could be 'std::unique_ptr<llvm::Record,std::default_delete<_Ty>> llvm::make_unique<llvm::Record,std::string,llvm::SMLoc&,llvm::RecordKeeper&,bool>(std::string &&,llvm::SMLoc &,llvm::RecordKeeper &,bool &&)'
with
[
_Ty=llvm::Record
]
C:\b\depot_tools\win_toolchain\vs2013_files\win8sdk\bin\..\..\VC\include\memory(1637): or 'std::unique_ptr<llvm::Record,std::default_delete<_Ty>> std::make_unique<llvm::Record,std::string,llvm::SMLoc&,llvm::RecordKeeper&,bool>(std::string &&,llvm::SMLoc &,llvm::RecordKeeper &,bool &&)' [found using argument-dependent lookup]
with
[
_Ty=llvm::Record
]
while trying to match the argument list '(std::string, llvm::SMLoc, llvm::RecordKeeper, bool)'
llvm-svn: 222967
By class-instance values I mean 'Class<Arg>' in 'Class<Arg>.Field' or in
'Other<Class<Arg>>' (syntactically s SimpleValue). This is to differentiate
from unnamed/anonymous record definitions (syntactically an ObjectBody) which
are not affected by this change.
Consider the testcase:
class Struct<int i> {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
class Class<Struct s> {
int Class_J = s.J;
}
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
defm Defm : MultiClass<2>;
Before this fix, DefmDef.Class_J yields !shl(I, 1) instead of 8.
This is the sequence of events. We start with this:
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
During ParseDef the anonymous object for the class-instance value is created:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 : Struct<i>;
def Def : Class<NAME#anonymous_0>;
}
Then class Struct<i> is added to anonymous_0. Also Class<NAME#anonymous_0> is
added to Def:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
def Def {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
}
So far so good but then we move on to instantiating this in the defm
by substituting the template arg 'i'.
This is how the anonymous prototype looks after fully instantiating.
defm Defm = {
def Defmanonymous_0 {
int I = 4;
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
Note that we only resolved the reference to the template arg. The
non-template-arg reference in 'J' has not been resolved yet.
Then we go on to instantiating the Def prototype:
def DefmDef {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
Which is resolved to Defmanonymous_0.J and then to !shl(I, 1).
When we fully resolve each record in a defm, Defmanonymous_0.J does get set
to 8 but that's too late for its use.
The patch adds a new attribute to the Record class that indicates that this
def is actually a class-instance value that may be *used* by other defs in a
multiclass. (This is unlike regular defs which don't reference each other and
thus can be resolved indepedently.) They are then fully resolved before the
other defs while the multiclass is instantiated.
I added vg_leak to the new test. I am not sure if this is necessary but I
don't think I have a way to test it. I can also check in without the XFAIL
and let the bots test this part.
Also tested that X86.td.expanded and AAarch64.td.expanded were unchange before
and after this change. (This issue triggering this problem is a WIP patch.)
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 217886
It also allows nested { } expressions, as now that they are sized, we can merge pull bits from the nested value.
In the current behaviour, everything in { } must have been convertible to a single bit.
However, now that binary literals are sized, its useful to be able to initialize a range of bits.
So, for example, its now possible to do
bits<8> x = { 0, 1, { 0b1001 }, 0, 0b0 }
llvm-svn: 215086
Instead of these becoming an integer literal internally, they now become bits<n> values.
Prior to this change, 0b001 was 1 bit long. This is confusing as clearly the user gave 3 bits.
This new type holds both the literal value and the size, and so can ensure sizes match on initializers.
For example, this used to be legal
bits<1> x = 0b00;
but now it must be written as
bits<2> x = 0b00;
llvm-svn: 215084
Instead allow the variable to be declared, but don't attach an initializer. This allows more than a single error to be emitted before we exit.
Test case to follow soon in another patch.
llvm-svn: 214375
This is currently for assigning from one bit init to another. It can easily be extended to other types.
Test to follow soon in another patch.
llvm-svn: 214374
string_ostream is a safe and efficient string builder that combines opaque
stack storage with a built-in ostream interface.
small_string_ostream<bytes> additionally permits an explicit stack storage size
other than the default 128 bytes to be provided. Beyond that, storage is
transferred to the heap.
This convenient class can be used in most places an
std::string+raw_string_ostream pair or SmallString<>+raw_svector_ostream pair
would previously have been used, in order to guarantee consistent access
without byte truncation.
The patch also converts much of LLVM to use the new facility. These changes
include several probable bug fixes for truncated output, a programming error
that's no longer possible with the new interface.
llvm-svn: 211749
Summary:
It concatenates two or more lists. In addition to the !strconcat semantics
the lists must have the same element type.
My overall aim is to make it easy to append to Instruction.Predicates
rather than override it. This can be done by concatenating lists passed as
arguments, or by concatenating lists passed in additional fields.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3506
llvm-svn: 208183
Yaron Keren