Based on the discussion in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135574.html, the
conclusion was reached that the ARM backend should produce vcmp instead
of vcmpe instructions by default, i.e. not be producing an Invalid
Operation exception when either arguments in a floating point compare
are quiet NaNs.
In the future, after constrained floating point intrinsics for floating
point compare have been introduced, vcmpe instructions probably should
be produced for those intrinsics - depending on the exact semantics
they'll be defined to have.
This patch logically consists of the following parts:
- Revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294945&view=rev and
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294968&view=rev, which
implemented fine-tuning for when to produce vcmpe (i.e. not do it for
equality comparisons). The complexity introduced by those patches
isn't needed anymore if we just always produce vcmp instead. Maybe
these patches need to be reintroduced again once support is needed to
map potential LLVM-IR constrained floating point compare intrinsics to
the ARM instruction set.
- Simply select vcmp, instead of vcmpe, see simple changes in
lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrVFP.td
- Adapt lots of tests that tested for vcmpe (instead of vcmp). For all
of these test, the intent of what is tested for isn't related to
whether the vcmp should produce an Invalid Operation exception or not.
Fixes PR43374.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68463
llvm-svn: 374025
Current findBestLoopTop can find and move one kind of block to top, a latch block has one successor. Another common case is:
* a latch block
* it has two successors, one is loop header, another is exit
* it has more than one predecessors
If it is below one of its predecessors P, only P can fall through to it, all other predecessors need a jump to it, and another conditional jump to loop header. If it is moved before loop header, all its predecessors jump to it, then fall through to loop header. So all its predecessors except P can reduce one taken branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256
llvm-svn: 363471
This behavior was added in r130928 for both FastISel and SD, and then
disabled in r131156 for FastISel.
This re-enables it for FastISel with the corresponding fix.
This is triggered only when FastISel can't lower the arguments and falls
back to SelectionDAG for it.
FastISel contains a map of "register fixups" where at the end of the
selection phase it replaces all uses of a register with another
register that FastISel sometimes pre-assigned. Code at the end of
SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction is doing the replacement at the
very end of the function, while other pieces that come in before that
look through the MachineFunction and assume everything is done. In this
case, the real issue is that the code emitting COPY instructions for the
liveins (physreg to vreg) (EmitLiveInCopies) is checking if the vreg
assigned to the physreg is used, and if it's not, it will skip the COPY.
If a register wasn't replaced with its assigned fixup yet, the copy will
be skipped and we'll end up with uses of undefined registers.
This fix moves the replacement of registers before the emission of
copies for the live-ins.
The initial motivation for this fix is to enable tail calls for
swiftself functions, which were blocked because we couldn't prove that
the swiftself argument (which is callee-save) comes from a function
argument (live-in), because there was an extra copy (vreg to vreg).
A few tests are affected by this:
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/swifterror.ll: we used to spill x21
(callee-save) but never reload it because it's attached to the return.
We now don't even spill it anymore.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/*/swiftself.ll: we tail-call now.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mubuf-legalize-operands.ll: I believe this
test was not really testing the right thing, but it worked because the
same registers were re-used.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/cmpxchg-O0.ll: regalloc changes
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/swifterror.ll: get rid of a copy
* llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/*: get rid of spills and copies
* llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/swift-return.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-unordered.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swifterror.ll: same as AArch64
* llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-declare-arg.ll: stack size changed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62361
llvm-svn: 362963
This is causing compilation timeouts on code with long sequences of
local values and calls (i.e. foo(1); foo(2); foo(3); ...). It turns out
that code coverage instrumentation is a great way to create sequences
like this, which how our users ran into the issue in practice.
Intel has a tool that detects these kinds of non-linear compile time
issues, and Andy Kaylor reported it as PR37010.
The current sinking code scans the whole basic block once per local
value sink, which happens before emitting each call. In theory, local
values should only be introduced to be used by instructions between the
current flush point and the last flush point, so we should only need to
scan those instructions.
llvm-svn: 329822
Summary:
Local values are constants, global addresses, and stack addresses that
can't be folded into the instruction that uses them. For example, when
storing the address of a global variable into memory, we need to
materialize that address into a register.
FastISel doesn't want to materialize any given local value more than
once, so it generates all local value materialization code at
EmitStartPt, which always dominates the current insertion point. This
allows it to maintain a map of local value registers, and it knows that
the local value area will always dominate the current insertion point.
The downside is that local value instructions are always emitted without
a source location. This is done to prevent jumpy line tables, but it
means that the local value area will be considered part of the previous
statement. Consider this C code:
call1(); // line 1
++global; // line 2
++global; // line 3
call2(&global, &local); // line 4
Today we end up with assembly and line tables like this:
.loc 1 1
callq call1
leaq global(%rip), %rdi
leaq local(%rsp), %rsi
.loc 1 2
addq $1, global(%rip)
.loc 1 3
addq $1, global(%rip)
.loc 1 4
callq call2
The LEA instructions in the local value area have no source location and
are treated as being on line 1. Stepping through the code in a debugger
and correlating it with the assembly won't make much sense, because
these materializations are only required for line 4.
This is actually problematic for the VS debugger "set next statement"
feature, which effectively assumes that there are no registers live
across statement boundaries. By sinking the local value code into the
statement and fixing up the source location, we can make that feature
work. This was filed as https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35975 and
https://crbug.com/793819.
This change is obviously not enough to make this feature work reliably
in all cases, but I felt that it was worth doing anyway because it
usually generates smaller, more comprehensible -O0 code. I measured a
0.12% regression in code generation time with LLC on the sqlite3
amalgamation, so I think this is worth doing.
There are some special cases worth calling out in the commit message:
1. local values materialized for phis
2. local values used by no-op casts
3. dead local value code
Local values can be materialized for phis, and this does not show up as
a vreg use in MachineRegisterInfo. In this case, if there are no other
uses, this patch sinks the value to the first terminator, EH label, or
the end of the BB if nothing else exists.
Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the register to
the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups map direction, we
don't have enough information to sink these instructions.
Lastly, if the local value register has no other uses, we can delete it.
This comes up when fastisel tries two instruction selection approaches
and the first materializes the value but fails and the second succeeds
without using the local value.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, qcolombet, MatzeB, vsk, echristo
Subscribers: dotdash, chandlerc, hans, sdardis, amccarth, javed.absar, zturner, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093
llvm-svn: 327581
Re-enable commit r323991 now that r325931 has been committed to make
MachineOperand::isRenamable() check more conservative w.r.t. code
changes and opt-in on a per-target basis.
llvm-svn: 326208
This reverts commit r323991.
This commit breaks target that don't model all the register constraints
in TableGen. So far the workaround was to set the
hasExtraXXXRegAllocReq, but it proves that it doesn't cover all the
cases.
For instance, when mutating an instruction (like in the lowering of
COPYs) the isRenamable flag is not properly updated. The same problem
will happen when attaching machine operand from one instruction to
another.
Geoff Berry is working on a fix in https://reviews.llvm.org/D43042.
llvm-svn: 325421
Enable multiple COPY hints to eliminate more COPYs during register allocation.
Note that this is something all targets should do, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128.
Review: Eli Friedman
llvm-svn: 325327
Summary:
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding
and adds an additional run of the pass to the default pass pipeline just
after register allocation.
This version of this patch uses the newly added
MachineOperand::isRenamable bit to avoid forwarding registers is such a
way as to violate constraints that aren't captured in the
Machine IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
This change is a continuation of the work started in D30751.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa, tstellar
Subscribers: tpr, mgorny, mcrosier, nhaehnle, nemanjai, jyknight, hfinkel, arsenm, inouehrs, eraman, sdardis, guyblank, fedor.sergeev, aheejin, dschuff, jfb, myatsina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41835
llvm-svn: 323991
Issues addressed since original review:
- Avoid bug in regalloc greedy/machine verifier when forwarding to use
in an instruction that re-defines the same virtual register.
- Fixed bug when forwarding to use in EarlyClobber instruction slot.
- Fixed incorrect forwarding to register definitions that showed up in
explicit_uses() iterator (e.g. in INLINEASM).
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 314729
Issues addressed since original review:
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312328
It caused PR34387: Assertion failed: (RegNo < NumRegs && "Attempting to access record for invalid register number!")
> Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
> - Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
> doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
> register number of the use.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
> can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
> end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
>
> [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
>
> This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
>
> This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
> be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
> assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
> allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
> through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312178
Summary:
Remove a check for `ARMSubtarget::isTargetDarwin` when determining
whether to use Swift error registers, so that Swift errors work
properly on non-Darwin ARM32 targets (specifically Android).
Before this patch, generated code would save and restores ARM register r8 at
the entry and returns of a function that throws. As r8 is used as a virtual
return value for the object being thrown, this gets overwritten by the restore,
and calling code is unable to catch the error. In turn this caused Swift code
that used `do`/`try`/`catch` to work improperly on Android ARM32 targets.
Addresses Swift bug report https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5438.
Patch by John Holdsworth.
Reviewers: manmanren, rjmccall, aschwaighofer
Reviewed By: aschwaighofer
Subscribers: srhines, aschwaighofer, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35835
llvm-svn: 312164
Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312154
Two issues identified by buildbots were addressed:
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311135
This reverts commit r311038.
Several buildbots are breaking, and at least one appears to be due to
the forwarding of physical regs enabled by this change. Reverting while
I investigate further.
llvm-svn: 311062
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311038
The benchmarking summarized in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/113525.html showed
this is beneficial for a wide range of cores.
As is to be expected, quite a few small adaptations are needed to the
regressions tests, as the difference in scheduling results in:
- Quite a few small instruction schedule differences.
- A few changes in register allocation decisions caused by different
instruction schedules.
- A few changes in IfConversion decisions, due to a difference in
instruction schedule and/or the estimated cost of a branch mispredict.
llvm-svn: 306514
The code assumed that we process instructions in basic block order. FastISel
processes instructions in reverse basic block order. We need to pre-assign
virtual registers before selecting otherwise we get def-use relationships wrong.
This only affects code with swifterror registers.
rdar://32659327
llvm-svn: 305484
Backends don't support this yet. They would have to move to the swifterror
register before the tail call to make sure it is live-in to the call.
rdar://30495920
llvm-svn: 294982
Functions that have a dynamic alloca require a base register which is defined to
be X19 on AArch64 and r6 on ARM. We have defined the swifterror register to be
the same register. Use a different callee save register for swifterror instead:
X21 on AArch64
R8 on ARM
rdar://30433803
llvm-svn: 294551
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
Fixed usage of std::sort so that we (hopefully) use instantiations that
actually exist in GCC 4.8.
llvm-svn: 286881
For example we were producing
push {r8, r10, r11, r4, r5, r7, lr}
This is misleading (r4, r5 and r7 are actually pushed before the rest), and
other components (stack folding recently) often forget to deal with the extra
complexity coming from the different order, leading to miscompiles. Finally, we
warn about our own code in -no-integrated-as mode without this, which is really
not a good idea.
llvm-svn: 286866
The code used llvm basic block predecessors to decided where to insert phi
nodes. Instruction selection can and will liberally insert new machine basic
block predecessors. There is not a guaranteed one-to-one mapping from pred.
llvm basic blocks and machine basic blocks.
Therefore the current approach does not work as it assumes we can mark
predecessor machine basic block as needing a copy, and needs to know the set of
all predecessor machine basic blocks to decide when to insert phis.
Instead of computing the swifterror vregs as we select instructions, propagate
them at the end of instruction selection when the MBB CFG is complete.
When an instruction needs a swifterror vreg and we don't know the value yet,
generate a new vreg and remember this "upward exposed" use, and reconcile this
at the end of instruction selection.
This will only happen if the target supports promoting swifterror parameters to
registers and the swifterror attribute is used.
rdar://28300923
llvm-svn: 283617
Kristof Beyls