This reverts commit r322917 due to multiple performance regressions in spec2006
and spec2017. XFAILed llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/big-callframe.ll which initially
motivated this change.
llvm-svn: 323683
Do not create CALLSEQ_START/CALLSEQ_END when there is no callframe to
setup and the callframe size is 0.
- Fixes an invalid callframe nesting for byval arguments, which would
look like this before this patch (as in `big-byval.ll`):
...
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 32768, 0, ... # Setup for extfunc
...
ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, ... # setup for memcpy
...
BL &memcpy ...
ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, ... # destroy for memcpy
...
BL &extfunc
ADJCALLSTACKUP 32768, 0, ... # destroy for extfunc
- Saves us two instructions in the common case of zero-sized stackframes.
- Remove an unnecessary scheduling barrier (hence the small unittest
changes).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42006
llvm-svn: 322917
Summary:
Now that store-merge is only generates type-safe stores, do a second
pass just before instruction selection to allow lowered intrinsics to
be merged as well.
Reviewers: jyknight, hfinkel, RKSimon, efriedma, rnk, jmolloy
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33675
llvm-svn: 319036
Initialize all AArch64-specific passes in the TargetMachine so they can be run
by llc. This can lead to conflicts in opt with some command line options that
share the same name as the pass, so I took this opportunity to do some cleanups:
* rename all relevant command line options from "aarch64-blah" to
"aarch64-enable-blah" and update the tests accordingly
* run clang-format on their declarations
* move all these declarations to a common place (the TargetMachine) as opposed
to having them scattered around (AArch64BranchRelaxation and
AArch64AddressTypePromotion were the only offenders)
llvm-svn: 277322
Disable post-ra scheduler for perturbed tests to appease the bots and to
preserve the history of the tests.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15652
llvm-svn: 256158
Tailcalls are only OK with forwarded sret pointers. With explicit sret,
one approximation is to check that the pointer isn't an Instruction, as
in that case it might point into some local memory (alloca). That's not
OK with tailcalls.
Explicit sret counterpart to r233409.
Differential Revison: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8510
llvm-svn: 233410
Jun Bum Lim