When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.
Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start
of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that
captures would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope,
followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope
between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach
the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured
variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from
the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope.
But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that
conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context,
we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point,
we can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context,
unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also
transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope.
When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda,
we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
This is a recommit of adff142dc2 after a fix in d8d793f29b
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
This reverts commit adff142dc2.
This broke clang bootstrap: it made existing C++ code in LLVM invalid:
llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveInterval.h:630:53: error: captured variable 'Idx' cannot appear here
[=](std::remove_reference_t<decltype(*Idx)> V,
^
Implement P2036R3.
Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.
Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.
The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.
The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.
We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.
The order of operations is as follow:
* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).
* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.
* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).
* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.
* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.
At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
This adjusts the handling for:
export module M;
export namespace {};
export namespace N {};
export using namespace N;
In the first case, we were allowing empty anonymous namespaces
as part of an extension allowing empty top-level entities, but that seems
inappropriate in this case, since the linkage would be internal for the
anonymous namespace. We now report an error for this.
The second case was producing a warning diagnostic that this was
accepted as an extension - however the C++20 standard does allow this
as well-formed.
In the third case we keep the current practice that this is accepted with a
warning (as an extension). The C++20 standard says it's an error.
We also ensure that using decls are only applied to items with external linkage.
This adjusts error messages for exports involving redeclarations in modules to
be more specific about the reason that the decl has been rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122119
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Implement a demangleable strong ownership symbol mangling.
* The original module symbol mangling scheme turned out to be
undemangleable.
* The hoped-for C++17 compatibility of weak ownership turns out to be
fragile
* C++20 now has better ways of controlling C++17 compatibility
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
GCC implements this new mangling.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122256
* Check for warnings instead of using -Werror, to avoid masking the
type of diagnostic emitted
* use different -verify labels instead of using conditional
compilation of diagnostic checks
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122265
Allow goto, labelled statements as well as `static`, `thread_local`, and
non-literal variables in `constexpr` functions.
As specified. for all of the above (except labelled statements) constant
evaluation of the construct still fails.
For `constexpr` bodies, the proposal is implemented with diagnostics as
a language extension in older language modes. For determination of
whether a lambda body satisfies the requirements for a constexpr
function, the proposal is implemented only in C++2b mode to retain the
semantics of older modes for programs conforming to them.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111400
The existing module symbol mangling scheme turns out to be
undemangleable. It is also desirable to switch to the
strong-ownership model as the hoped-for C++17 compatibility turns out
to be fragile, and we also now have a better way of controlling that.
The issue is captured on the ABI list at:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/134
A document describing the issues and new mangling is at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qQjqptzOFT_lfXH8L6-iD9nCRi34wjft/view
This patch is the code-generation part. I have a demangler too, but
that patch is based on some to-be-landed refactoring of the demangler.
The old mangling is unceremoniously dropped. No backwards
compatibility, no deprectated old-mangling flag. It was always
labelled experimental. (Old and new manglings cannot be confused.)
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118352
Given a dependent `T` (maybe an undeduced `auto`),
Before:
new T(z) --> new T((z)) # changes meaning with more args
new T{z} --> new T{z}
T(z) --> T(z)
T{z} --> T({z}) # forbidden if T is auto
After:
new T(z) --> new T(z)
new T{z} --> new T{z}
T(z) --> T(z)
T{z} --> T{z}
Depends on D113393
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120608
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
The superclass method handles a bunch of useful things. For example
it applies flags such as `-fnew-alignment` which doesn't work without
this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118573
DR2390 clarifies that the argument to __has_cpp_attribute() needs to be
macro-expanded. Clang already supports this and tests it explicitly in
clang/test/Preprocessor/has_attribute.cpp.
Copy the test over to clang/test/CXX/drs/ so the make_cxx_drs script
picks it up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119230
Clang already handles this fine, so add a test case to let the
make_cxx_dr_status script pick it up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119224
Since the serialization code would recognize modules by names and the
name of all global module fragment is <global>, so that the
serialization code would complain for the same module.
This patch fixes this by using a unique global module fragment in Sema.
Before this patch, the compiler would fail on an assertion complaining
the duplicated modules.
Reviewed By: urnathan, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610
These tests emit unexpected diagnostics on AIX because the byval alignment warning is emitted too aggressively. https://reviews.llvm.org/D118350 is supposed to provide a proper fix to the problem, but for the time being disable the tests to unblock.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118670
Since only the decls inhabit in a namespace scope could be exported, it
is not meaningful to check it in CheckRedeclarationExported, which
implements [module.interface]/p6.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118120
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
Turning on `enable_noundef_analysis` flag allows better codegen by removing freeze instructions.
I modified clang by renaming `enable_noundef_analysis` flag to `disable-noundef-analysis` and turning it off by default.
Test updates are made as a separate patch: D108453
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105169
Commit 5fbe21a774 missed committing the correct checking of
out-of-class comparision operator argument types. These are they,
from the originally posted diff.
Reviewed By: mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115894
This implements p2085, allowing out-of-class defaulting of comparison
operators, primarily so they need not be inline, IIUC intent. this was
mostly straigh forward, but required reimplementing
Sema::CheckExplicitlyDefaultedComparison, as now there's a case where
we have no a priori clue as to what class a defaulted comparison may
be for. We have to inspect the parameter types to find out. Eg:
class X { ... };
bool operator==(X, X) = default;
Thus reimplemented the parameter type checking, and added 'is this a
friend' functionality for the above case.
Reviewed By: mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104478
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113245
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
Previously we would create global module fragment for extern linkage
declaration which is alreday in global module fragment. However, it is
clearly redundant to do so. This patch would check if the extern linkage
declaration are already in GMF before we create a GMF for it.
According to [basic.namespace.general]/p2, a namespace declaration
shouldn't have a module linkage.
> A namespace is never attached to a named module and never has a name
> with module linkage.
Without this patch, the compiler would crash for the test in assertion
enabled build due to inconsistent linkage for redeclaration for
namespaces.
Reviewed by: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115132
According to [module.unit]p7.2.3, a declaration within a linkage-specification
should be attached to the global module.
This let user to forward declare types across modules.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110215
This fixes in a regression introduced by 6eeda06c1.
When deducing the return type of nested function calls, only the
return type of the outermost expression should be ignored.
Instead of assuming all contextes nested in a discared statements
are themselves discarded, only assume that in immediate contexts.
Similarly, only consider contextes immediately in an immediate or
discarded statement as being themselves immediate.
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
Roy Jacobson