If an FP_EXTEND or FP_ROUND isel dag node converts directly between
f16 and f32 when the target CPU has no instruction to do it in one go,
it has to be done in two steps instead, going via f32.
Previously, this was done implicitly, because all such CPUs had the
storage-only implementation of f16 (i.e. the only thing you can do
with one at all is to convert it to/from f32). So isel would legalize
the f16 into an f32 as soon as it saw it, by inserting an fp16_to_fp
node (or vice versa), and then the fp_extend would already be f32->f64
rather than f16->f64.
But that technique can't support a target CPU which has full f16
support but _not_ f64, such as some variants of Arm v8.1-M. So now we
provide custom lowering for FP_EXTEND and FP_ROUND, which checks
support for f16 and f64 and decides on the best thing to do given the
combination of flags it gets back.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60692
llvm-svn: 364294
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
I'm really not sure why we were in the first place, it's the linker's job to
convert between BL/BLX as necessary. Even worse, using BLX left Thumb calls
that could be locally resolved completely unencodable since all offsets to BLX
are multiples of 4.
rdar://26182344
llvm-svn: 269101
Other targets probably should as well. Since r237161, compiler-rt has
both, but I don't see why anything other than gnueabi would use a
gnueabi naming scheme.
llvm-svn: 237324
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.
A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)
import fileinput
import sys
import re
pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")
for line in sys.stdin:
sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))
Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649
llvm-svn: 230794
Actual support for softening f16 operations is still limited, and can be added
when it's needed. But Soften is much closer to being a useful thing to try
than keeping it Legal when no registers can actually hold such values.
Longer term, we probably want something between Soften and Promote semantics
for most targets, it'll be more efficient to promote the 4 basic operations to
f32 than libcall them.
llvm-svn: 213372
Simon Tatham