Summary:
It is sometimes important to check that some newly-computed value
is non-negative and only n bits wide (where n is a variable.)
There are many ways to check that:
https://godbolt.org/z/o4RB8D
The last variant seems best?
(I'm sure there are some other variations i haven't thought of..)
More complicated, canonical pattern:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/uhA
We do need to have two `switch()`'es like this,
to not mismatch the swappable predicates.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52001
llvm-svn: 342173
This adds DebugCounter support to the PartiallyInlineLibCalls pass,
which should make debugging/automated bisection easier in the future.
Patch by Zhizhou Yang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50093
llvm-svn: 342172
Came up in https://reviews.llvm.org/D52001#1233827
While we don't do a good job here, we at least want to make
sure that we don't have any inf-loops.
llvm-svn: 342171
add a tool to generate symbol remapping files.
Summary:
The new tool llvm-cxxmap builds a symbol mapping table from a file containing
a description of partial equivalences to apply to mangled names and files
containing old and new symbol tables.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51470
llvm-svn: 342168
The two existing implementations have the function implemented
identically, and there's no reason to believe that this would be
different for other implementations.
llvm-svn: 342167
Summary:
The hash computed for an ArrayType was different when first constructed
versus when later profiled due to the constructor default argument, and
we were not tracking constructor / destructor variant as part of the
mangled name AST, leading to incorrect equivalences.
Reviewers: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51463
llvm-svn: 342166
Summary:
Previously, any instance of -fomit-frame-pointer would make it such that
-pg was an invalid flag combination. If -fno-omit-frame-pointer is
passed later on the command line (such that it actually takes effect),
-pg should be allowed.
Reviewers: nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: manojgupta, nickdesaulniers, cfe-commits, kongyi, chh, pirama
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51713
llvm-svn: 342165
This allows the xor to be removed completely.
This might help with recomitting r341674, but seems good regardless.
Coincidentally fixes PR38915.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51964
llvm-svn: 342163
Summary:
Fixed assertions due to invalid fixup when encoding compressed instructions
(c.addi, c.addiw, c.li, c.andi) with bare symbols with/without modifiers.
This matches GAS behavior as well.
This bug was uncovered by a LLVM MC Disassembler Protocol Buffer Fuzzer
for the RISC-V assembly language.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52005
llvm-svn: 342160
Summary:
The illegal instruction 0x00 0x00 is being wrongly decoded as
c.addi4spn with 0 immediate.
The invalid instruction 0x01 0x61 is being wrongly decoded as
c.addi16sp with 0 immediate.
This bug was uncovered by a LLVM MC Disassembler Protocol Buffer Fuzzer
for the RISC-V assembly language.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51815
llvm-svn: 342159
For lld-link missing.obj, lld-link currently prints:
lld-link: error: could not open foo.obj: No such file or directory
lld-link: warning: /machine is not specified. x64 is assumed
lld-link: error: subsystem must be defined
The 2nd and 3rd diagnostics are consequences of the input not existing and are
not interesting. If input files are missing, the best thing we can do is point
that out and then return.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51981
llvm-svn: 342158
Also, add a check to ensure that when main has the expected signature
we do not create a wrapper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51562
llvm-svn: 342157
This patch abstracts `PostingList` interface and reuses existing
implementation. It will be used later to test different `PostingList`
representations.
No functionality change is introduced, this patch is mostly refactoring
so that the following patches could focus on functionality while not
being too hard to review.
Reviewed By: sammccall, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51982
llvm-svn: 342155
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
Previously, both types (plus the future target-clones) of
multiversioning had a separate ResolverOption structure and emission
function. This patch combines the two, at the expense of a slightly
more expensive sorting function.
llvm-svn: 342152
declare reduction.
If the declare reduction construct with the non-dependent type is
defined in the template construct, the compiler might crash on the
template instantition. Reworked the whole instantiation scheme for the
declare reduction constructs to fix this problem correctly.
llvm-svn: 342151
I accidentally committed this diff with rL342147 because
I had applied D51964. We probably do need those checks,
but D51964 has tests and more discussion/motivation,
so they should be re-added with that patch.
llvm-svn: 342149
I don't have a test case for this, but it's motivated by
the discussion in D51964, and I've added TODO comments for
the better fix - move simplifications into instsimplify
because that's more efficient and reduces risk of infinite
loops in instcombine caused by transforms trying to do the
opposite folds.
In this case, we know that the transform that tries to move
'not' through min/max can be fooled by the multiple uses
of a value in another min/max, so try to squash the
foldSPFofSPF() patterns first.
llvm-svn: 342147
If --just-syms is used the mapping symbols from the ELF file will be
absolute symbols with no section. The code to process mapping symbols in
--fix-cortex-a53-843419 assumes that these symbols have a defining section
so a crash will result when --just-syms is used. The simple fix is to not
process the symbol when it doesn't have a section.
Fixes PR37971
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52038
llvm-svn: 342146
After landing r341457, we started seeing a failure on the swift-lldb
bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a DW_OP_constu
was replaced with DW_OP_lit23, the value remaining identical.
0x000000f4: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_location (0x00000000
[0x0000000100000a51, 0x0000000100000d47): DW_OP_lit23, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("number")
However, this broke LLDB.
(Int) number = <extracting data from value failed>
The value was read correctly, but apparently the value's type was different.
When reading a constu it was reading a uint64 (m_type = e_ulonglong) while for
the literal, it got a signed int (m_type = e_sint). This change makes sure we
read the value as an unsigned.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
llvm-svn: 342142
We previously only allowed truncs as sinks, but now allow them as
sources too. We do this by checking that the result type is the
narrow type that we're trying to optimise for.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51978
llvm-svn: 342141
Part of FixConsts wrongly assumes either a 8- or 16-bit constant
which can result in the wrong constants being generated during
promotion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52032
llvm-svn: 342140
As discussed during D51860 review, it is better to use `llvm::Optional`
here as it has clear semantics which reflect intended behavior.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52028
llvm-svn: 342138
After `FuzzyFindRequest` JSON (de)serialization was introduced, it
should replace ad-hoc fuzzy-find request parsing implemented in the
IndexBenchmark driver.
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51971
llvm-svn: 342137
In r319995, we fixed the line table format to version 2 on Darwin
because dsymutil didn't yet understand the new format which caused test
failures for the LLDB bots. This has been resolved in the meantime so
there's no reason to keep this limitation.
rdar://problem/35968332
llvm-svn: 342136
Summary:
The cancelable scopes are managed by JSONRPCDispatcher so that all Handlers
run in cancelable contexts.
(Previously ClangdServer did this, for code completion only).
Cancellation request processing is therefore also in JSONRPCDispatcher.
(Previously it was in ClangdLSPServer).
This doesn't actually make any new commands *respect* cancellation - they'd
need to check isCancelled() and bail out. But it opens the door to doing
this incrementally, and putting such logic in common machinery like TUScheduler.
I also rewrote the ClangdServer class/threading comments because I wanted to
add to it and I got carried away.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52004
llvm-svn: 342135
Summary:
The wording implies global index support, which is confusing.
As most users shouldn't care about this flag, also make it hidden to avoid
further confusion.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51977
llvm-svn: 342134
If an argument was passed on the stack, this
was using the default alignment.
I'm not sure there's an observable change from this. This
was observable due to bugs in expansion of unaligned
loads and stores, but since that is fixed I don't think
this matters much.
llvm-svn: 342133
Summary:
Task is no longer exposed:
- task cancellation is hidden as a std::function
- task creation returns the new context directly
- checking is via free function only, with no way to avoid the context lookup
The implementation is essentially the same, but a bit terser as it's hidden.
isCancelled() is now safe to use outside any task (it returns false).
This will leave us free to sprinkle cancellation in e.g. TUScheduler without
needing elaborate test setup, and lets callers that don't cancel "just work".
Updated the docs to describe the new expected use pattern.
One thing I noticed: there's nothing async-specific about the cancellation.
Async tasks can be cancelled from any thread (typically the one that created
them), sync tasks can be cancelled from any *other* thread in the same way.
So the docs now refer to "long-running" tasks instead of async ones.
Updated usage in code complete, without any structural changes.
I didn't update all the names of the helpers in ClangdLSPServer (these will
likely be moved to JSONRPCDispatcher anyway).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51996
llvm-svn: 342130
Many editors provide extensions and plugins with LSP Client
functionality. Many of these are known to work with Clangd, this patch
points users to the relevant resources for better experience.
Reviewed By: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision
llvm-svn: 342129
The Technical Reference Manuals for these two CPUs state that branching
to an unaligned 32-bit instruction incurs an extra pipeline reload
penalty. That's bad.
This also enables the optimization at -Os since it costs on average one
byte per loop in return for 1 cycle per iteration, which is pretty good
going.
llvm-svn: 342127
Functions generated by clang and included in the .init_array section (such as
static constructors) do not follow the usual code path for adding
target-specific function attributes, so we have to add the return address
signing attribute here too, as is currently done for the sanitisers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51418
llvm-svn: 342126
Nirav Dave