This may not work on build platforms that place the binaries on
special folders ($build_dir/bin/Release/) such as the VS IDE and
XCode. For fixing this it is necessary to add a lit.py configuration
option for saying where the Clang binaries are, and apply to that path
the same magit that is used with the path to the LLVM tools binary
directory. Doing this requires a bit of autoconf work.
llvm-svn: 124969
the 'build_config' value in at runtime using the new lit runtime user parameter
feature.
This simplifies things and drops a dependency on 'sed', FWIW.
llvm-svn: 86421
only supporting a single stat cache. The immediate benefit of this
change is that we can now generate a PCH/AST file when including
another PCH file; in the future, the chain of stat caches will likely
be useful with multiple levels of PCH files.
llvm-svn: 84263
essence, code completion is triggered by a magic "code completion"
token produced by the lexer [*], which the parser recognizes at
certain points in the grammar. The parser then calls into the Action
object with the appropriate CodeCompletionXXX action.
Sema implements the CodeCompletionXXX callbacks by performing minimal
translation, then forwarding them to a CodeCompletionConsumer
subclass, which uses the results of semantic analysis to provide
code-completion results. At present, only a single, "printing" code
completion consumer is available, for regression testing and
debugging. However, the design is meant to permit other
code-completion consumers.
This initial commit contains two code-completion actions: one for
member access, e.g., "x." or "p->", and one for
nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "std::". More code-completion actions
will follow, along with improved gathering of code-completion results
for the various contexts.
[*] In the current -code-completion-dump testing/debugging mode, the
file is truncated at the completion point and EOF is translated into
"code completion".
llvm-svn: 82166
- Move CMake to using the new test runner.
- Switch Makefiles to use the lit.site.cfg.in template.
- Remove explicit --path arguments, instead this gets written into the site
configuration. This means running lit from the command line should use the
exact same configuration as is used in 'make test', assuming it can find the
site configuration file. You still need to run 'make test' (or the cmake
build target equivalent) at least once.
llvm-svn: 82160
- MultiTestRunner will eventually be renamed to 'lit', for LLVM integrated
tester/testing. This has the pros of being pronouncable and short.
- "Project" level configuration lives in 'lit.cfg', which is also what lit uses
to find the root testing directory in some cases. This can be overridden for
use in project files which want to precisely specify where things are.
- TestRunner.py is not longer able to be invoked directly.
- Moved some code to Util.py.
- Introduced a configuration object.
- Cleaned up --help, removed a few not-very-useful options.
- Tried not to break anything that works. :)
llvm-svn: 77665
declaration in the AST.
The new ASTContext::getCommentForDecl function searches for a comment
that is attached to the given declaration, and returns that comment,
which may be composed of several comment blocks.
Comments are always available in an AST. However, to avoid harming
performance, we don't actually parse the comments. Rather, we keep the
source ranges of all of the comments within a large, sorted vector,
then lazily extract comments via a binary search in that vector only
when needed (which never occurs in a "normal" compile).
Comments are written to a precompiled header/AST file as a blob of
source ranges. That blob is only lazily loaded when one requests a
comment for a declaration (this never occurs in a "normal" compile).
The indexer testbed now supports comment extraction. When the
-point-at location points to a declaration with a Doxygen-style
comment, the indexer testbed prints the associated comment
block(s). See test/Index/comments.c for an example.
Some notes:
- We don't actually attempt to parse the comment blocks themselves,
beyond identifying them as Doxygen comment blocks to associate them
with a declaration.
- We won't find comment blocks that aren't adjacent to the
declaration, because we start our search based on the location of
the declaration.
- We don't go through the necessary hops to find, for example,
whether some redeclaration of a declaration has comments when our
current declaration does not. Similarly, we don't attempt to
associate a \param Foo marker in a function body comment with the
parameter named Foo (although that is certainly possible).
- Verification of my "no performance impact" claims is still "to be
done".
llvm-svn: 74704
Douglas Gregor