Validates inputs are not NULL, checks for overlapping strings, concatenates the strings checking for buffer overflow, sets the length of the destination string to the sum of the s1 length and the s2 length, binds the return value to the s1 value.
llvm-svn: 129215
Make KEYALL a combination of all other flags instead
of its own separate flag. Also rewrite the enum
definitions in hex instead of decimal.
llvm-svn: 129213
Put the logic for deciding the default name for gcc/g++
in the only place that actually cares about it.
This also pushes an ifdef out of the generic driver code
to a little further down, when the target is actually known.
Hopefully it can be changed into just a runtime check
in the future.
llvm-svn: 129212
type rather than just the literal 'false'. This begins fixing PR9612,
but the message is now wrong. WIP, the cleanup of the messaging is next.
llvm-svn: 129204
to be reworked to model CallEnter/CallExit (just like all other calls). For now, treat constructors mostly
like other function calls, making the analysis of C++ code just a little more useful.
llvm-svn: 129166
This patch authored by Eric Niebler.
Many methods on the Sema class (e.g. ConvertPropertyForRValue) take Expr
pointers as in/out parameters (Expr *&). This is especially true for the
routines that apply implicit conversions to nodes in-place. This design is
workable only as long as those conversions cannot fail. If they are allowed
to fail, they need a way to report their failures. The typical way of doing
this in clang is to use an ExprResult, which has an extra bit to signal a
valid/invalid state. Returning ExprResult is de riguour elsewhere in the Sema
interface. We suggest changing the Expr *& parameters in the Sema interface
to ExprResult &. This increases interface consistency and maintainability.
This interface change is important for work supporting MS-style C++
properties. For reasons explained here
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013180.html>,
seemingly trivial operations like rvalue/lvalue conversions that formerly
could not fail now can. (The reason is that given the semantics of the
feature, getter/setter method lookup cannot happen until the point of use, at
which point it may be found that the method does not exist, or it may have the
wrong type, or overload resolution may fail, or it may be inaccessible.)
llvm-svn: 129143
The idea is that you can create a VarDecl with an unknown type, or a
FunctionDecl with an unknown return type, and it will still be valid to
access that object as long as you explicitly cast it at every use. I'm
still going back and forth about how I want to test this effectively, but
I wanted to go ahead and provide a skeletal implementation for the LLDB
folks' benefit and because it also improves some diagnostic goodness for
placeholder expressions.
llvm-svn: 129065
marked explicitly as uninitialized through direct self initialization:
int x = x;
With r128894 we prevented warnings about this code, and this patch
teaches the analysis engine to continue analyzing subsequent uses of
'x'. This should wrap up PR9624.
There is still an open question of whether we should suppress the
maybe-uninitialized warnings resulting from variables initialized in
this fashion. The definitely-uninitialized uses should always be warned.
llvm-svn: 128932
developers can see if their driver changed any cl::Option's. The
current implementation isn't perfect but handles most kinds of
options. This is nice to have when decomposing the stages of
compilation and moving between different drivers. It's also a good
sanity check when comparing results produced by different command line
invocations that are expected to produce the comparable results.
Note: This is not an attempt to prolong the life of cl::Option. On the
contrary, it's a placeholder for a feature that must exist when
cl::Option is replaced by a more appropriate framework. A new
framework needs: a central option registry, dynamic name lookup,
non-global containers of option values (e.g. per-module,
per-function), *and* the ability to print options values and their defaults at
any point during compilation.
llvm-svn: 128911
extracts a function to handle the emission of the diagnostic separately
from the walking over the set of uninitialized uses.
Also updates the naming used within this extracted function to be a bit
more consistent with the rest of Clang's naming patterns.
The next step will be breaking this apart so that we can go through
different functions rather than tracking so many boolean variables.
llvm-svn: 128898
int x = x;
GCC disables its warnings on this construct as a way of indicating that
the programmer intentionally wants the variable to be uninitialized.
Only the warning on the initializer is turned off in this iteration.
This makes the code a lot more ugly, but starts commenting the
surprising behavior here. This is a WIP, I want to refactor it
substantially for clarity, and to determine whether subsequent warnings
should be suppressed or not.
llvm-svn: 128894
I think this moves the code in the desired direction of the new style
recommendations (and style conventional in Clang), but if anyone prefers
the previous style, or has other suggestions just chime in and I'll
follow up.
llvm-svn: 128878
1) Change the CFG to include the DeclStmt for conditional variables, instead of using the condition itself as a faux DeclStmt.
2) Update ExprEngine (the static analyzer) to understand (1), so not to regress.
3) Update UninitializedValues.cpp to initialize all tracked variables to Uninitialized at the start of the function/method.
4) Only use the SelfReferenceChecker (SemaDecl.cpp) on global variables, leaving the dataflow analysis to handle other cases.
The combination of (1) and (3) allows the dataflow-based -Wuninitialized to find self-init problems when the initializer
contained control-flow.
llvm-svn: 128858
Sandeep Patel noticed that the alignment was wrong for Neon vector types,
and this change is partly derived from his patch. For the APCS ABI, however,
additional changes were required: the maximum ABI alignment is 32 bits and
the preferred alignment for i64 and f64 types should be 64 bits.
llvm-svn: 128825
a couple of operator overloads which form interesting expressions in the
AST.
I added test cases for both bugs with the c-index-test's token
annotation feature. Also, thanks to John McCall for confirming that this
is the correct solution.
llvm-svn: 128768
location into a TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc. These were found using
a hand-written program to inspect every source location in
TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs and Valgrind. I don't know of any way to
test them in Clang's existing test suite sadly.
Example code that triggers the ElaboratedType case:
template <typename T> struct X1 {
template <typename U> struct X1_1 {
int x;
};
};
template <typename T, typename U> struct X2 {
typename X1<T>::template X1_1<U> B;
};
X2<char, int> x2;
The other fix was simply spotted by inspection. I audited all constructions of
[Dependent]TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in TreeTransform.h, and the rest set
the TemplateNameLoc properly.
llvm-svn: 128702
the array alignment to the array access.
- This is more or less the best we can do without having alignment present in
the type system, but is a long way from truly matching how GCC handles this.
llvm-svn: 128691
Note this can potentially be enhanced to detect if the __block variable
is actually written by the block, or only when the block "escapes" or
is actually used, but that requires more analysis than it is probably worth
for this simple check.
llvm-svn: 128681
Models mempcpy() so that if length is NULL the destination pointer is returned. Otherwise, the source and destination are confirmed not to be NULL and not overlapping. Finally the copy is validated to not cause a buffer overrun and the return value is bound to the address of the byte after the last byte copied.
llvm-svn: 128677
__block object copy/dispose helpers for C++ objects with those for
different variables with completely different semantics simply because
they happen to both be no more aligned than a pointer.
Found by inspection.
Also, internalize most of the helper generation logic within CGBlocks.cpp,
and refactor it to fit my peculiar aesthetic sense.
llvm-svn: 128618
from how we process ordinary function calls, had a tremendous about of redundancy, and relied
strictly on inlining behavior (which was incomplete) to provide semantics instead of falling
back to the conservative analysis we use for C functions. This is a significant step into
making C++ analyzer support more useful.
llvm-svn: 128557
when the resolution took place due to a single template specialization
being named with an explicit template argument list. In this case, the
"resolution" doesn't take into account the target type at all, and
therefore can take place for functions, static member functions, and
*non-static* member functions. The latter weren't being properly checked
and their proper form enforced in this scenario. We now do so.
The result of this last form slipping through was some confusing logic
in IsStandardConversion handling of these resolved address-of
expressions which eventually exploded in an assert. Simplify this logic
a bit and add some more aggressive asserts to catch improperly formed
expressions getting into this routine.
Finally add systematic testing of member functions, both static and
non-static, in the various forms they can take. One of these is
essentially PR9563, and this commit fixes the crash in that PR. However,
the diagnostics for this are still pretty terrible. We at least are now
accepting the correct constructs and rejecting the invalid ones rather
than accepting invalid or crashing as before.
llvm-svn: 128456
my expertise on the template instantiation logic isn't good enough to fix this problem for real. This patch worksaround the
problem in -Wuninitialized, but we should fix it for real later.
llvm-svn: 128443
required modifying a few tests that specifically use note include stacks
to check the source manager's view of include stacks. I've simply added
the flag to these tests for now, they may have to be more substantially
changed if we decide to remove support for note include stacks
altogether.
Also, add a test for include stacks on notes that was supposed to go in
with the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 128390
This is basically the same idea as the warning on uninitialized uses of
fields within an initializer list. As such, it is on by default and
under -Wuninitialized.
Original patch by Richard Trieu, with some massaging from me on the
wording and grouping of the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 128376
Emit them instead with the linkage of the VTT.
I'm actually really ambivalent about this; it's what GCC does, but outside
of improving code size (if the linkage is coalescing), I'm not sure it's
at all relevant. Construction vtables are naturally referenced only by the
VTT, which is itself only referenced by complete-object constructors and
destructors; giving the construction vtables possibly-external linkage is
important if you have an optimization that drills through the VTT to a
reference to a particular construction vtable which it cannot just emit
itself.
llvm-svn: 128374
These stacks are often less important than those on primary diagnostics.
As the number of notes grows, this becomes increasingly important. The
include stack printing is clever and doesn't print stacks for adjacent
diagnostics from the same file, but when a note is in between a sequence
of errors in a header file, and the notes all refer to some other file,
we end up getting a worst-case ping-pong of include stacks that take up
a great deal of vertical space.
Still, for now, the default behavior isn't changed. We can evaluate user
feedback with the flag.
Patch by Richard Trieu, a couple of style tweaks from me.
llvm-svn: 128371
default for -fwrapv if that flag isn't specified explicitly. We always
prefer an explict setting of -fwrapv when present. Also adds support for
-fno-wrapv to allow disabling -fwrapv even when -fno-strict-overflow is
passed.
llvm-svn: 128353
platform implies default visibility. To achieve these, refactor our
lookup of explicit visibility so that we search for both an explicit
VisibilityAttr and an appropriate AvailabilityAttr, favoring the
VisibilityAttr if it is present.
llvm-svn: 128336
the following '@'. Conceivably, we could skip tokens until something that
can validly start an @interface declaration here, but it's not clear that
it matters.
llvm-svn: 128325
Eli Friedman