specifications on member function templates of class templates and other such
nested beasties. Store the function template from which we are to instantiate
an exception specification rather than trying to deduce it. Plus some
additional test cases.
llvm-svn: 155076
We have a new flavor of exception specification, EST_Uninstantiated. A function
type with this exception specification carries a pointer to a FunctionDecl, and
the exception specification for that FunctionDecl is instantiated (if needed)
and used in the place of the function type's exception specification.
When a function template declaration with a non-trivial exception specification
is instantiated, the specialization's exception specification is set to this
new 'uninstantiated' kind rather than being instantiated immediately.
Expr::CanThrow has migrated onto Sema, so it can instantiate exception specs
on-demand. Also, any odr-use of a function triggers the instantiation of its
exception specification (the exception specification could be needed by IRGen).
In passing, fix two places where a DeclRefExpr was created but the corresponding
function was not actually marked odr-used. We used to get away with this, but
don't any more.
Also fix a bug where instantiating an exception specification which refers to
function parameters resulted in a crash. We still have the same bug in default
arguments, which I'll be looking into next.
This, plus a tiny patch to fix libstdc++'s common_type, is enough for clang to
parse (and, in very limited testing, support) all of libstdc++4.7's standard
headers.
llvm-svn: 154886
in the declaration of a non-static member function after the
(optional) cv-qualifier-seq, which in practice means in the exception
specification and late-specified return type.
The new scheme here used to manage 'this' outside of a member function
scope is more general than the Scope-based mechanism previously used
for non-static data member initializers and late-parsesd attributes,
because it can also handle the cv-qualifiers on the member
function. Note, however, that a separate pass is required for static
member functions to determine whether 'this' was used, because we
might not know that we have a static function until after declaration
matching.
Finally, this introduces name mangling for 'this' and for the implicit
'this', which is intended to match GCC's mangling. Independent
verification for the new mangling test case would be appreciated.
Fixes PR10036 and PR12450.
llvm-svn: 154799
initialize an array of unsigned char. Outside C++11 mode, this bug was benign,
and just resulted in us emitting a constant which was double the required
length, padded with 0s. In C++11, it resulted in us generating an array whose
first element was something like i8 ptrtoint ([n x i8]* @str to i8).
llvm-svn: 154756
jump into these scopes, and the cleanup-entering code sometimes wants
to do some operations first (e.g. a GEP), which can leave us with
unparented IR.
llvm-svn: 154684
in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and
specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also
means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization,
rather than just creating a store.
On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic
conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR
generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make
sense.
llvm-svn: 154612
global destructor entry. For some reason this isn't enabled for
apple-kexts; it'd be good to have documentation for that.
Based on a patch by Nakamura Takumi!
llvm-svn: 154191
number + context) to the point where we initially start defining the
lambda, so that the linkage won't change when that information is made
available. Fixes the assertion in <rdar://problem/11182962>.
Plus, actually mangle the context of lambdas properly.
llvm-svn: 154029
This was caused by the code deciding the number of fields in the byref structure using a different test to the part of the code creating the GEPs into said structure.
llvm-svn: 154013
property file/line rather than the @synthesize file/line. Avoids
some nasty confusing-ness with conflating the file from the scope
and the line from the original declaration. Use the current scope
location as a separate parameter so that we can match it up
better in the line table with the beginning of the scope.
Update a couple of testcases accordingly since I had to change
that we actually use the passed in location in EmitFunctionStart
and for the new metadata parameter and add a new testcase to
make sure we've got the right line numbers for synthesized
properties.
Part of rdar://11026482
llvm-svn: 153917
the function body, but do so in a way that doesn't make any assumptions
about the static local actually having a proper, unique mangling,
since apparently we don't do that correctly at all.
llvm-svn: 153776
These patches cause us to miscompile and/or reject code with static
function-local variables in an extern-C context. Previously, we were
papering over this as long as the variables are within the same
translation unit, and had not seen any failures in the wild. We still
need a proper fix, which involves mangling static locals inside of an
extern-C block (as GCC already does), but this patch causes pretty
widespread regressions. Firefox, and many other applications no longer
build.
Lots of test cases have been posted to the list in response to this
commit, so there should be no problem reproducing the issues.
llvm-svn: 153768
the case that the variable already exists. Partly this is just
protection against people making crazy declarations with custom
asm labels or extern "C" names that intentionally collide with
the manglings of such variables, but the main reason is that we
can actually emit a static local variable twice with the
requirement that it match up. There may be other cases with
(e.g.) the various nested functions, but the main exemplar is
with constructor variants, where we can be forced into
double-emitting the function body under certain circumstances
like (currently) the presence of virtual bases.
llvm-svn: 153723
flag as GCC uses: -fstrict-enums). There is a *lot* of code making
unwarranted assumptions about the underlying type of enums, and it
doesn't seem entirely reasonable to eagerly break all of it.
Much more importantly, the current state of affairs is *very* good at
optimizing based upon this information, which causes failures that are
very distant from the actual enum. Before we push for enabling this by
default, I think we need to implement -fcatch-undefined-behavior support
for instrumenting and trapping whenever we store or load a value outside
of the range. That way we can track down the misbehaving code very
quickly.
I discussed this with Rafael, and currently the only important cases he
is aware of are the bool range-based optimizations which are staying
hard enabled. We've not seen any issue with those either, and they are
much more important for performance.
llvm-svn: 153550
For i686 targets (eg. cygwin), I saw "Range must not be empty!" in verifier.
It produces (i32)[0x80000000:0x80000000) from (uint64_t)[0xFFFFFFFF80000000ULL:0x0000000080000000ULL), for signed i32 on MDNode::Range.
llvm-svn: 153382
relied on an artifact of how the inliner and subsequent passes in
clang's -O3 mode happen to treat basic blocks and the labels for the
basic blocks. In my work on the inliner, and changed this fundamental
assumption, and the label that was being checked on the entry basic
block will no longer appear in opt builds. There was no reason to expect
the label to always be present anyways, much to my regret.
I've changed the test to just ensure that we return an immediate
constant. If there are intervening instructions, that's bad, but not
really that relevant to the test.
I'd love it if others have a better way of checking that a function body
contains only a 'ret' instruction that isn't dependent on whether or not
the entry block receives a label...
llvm-svn: 153243
in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases
could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared
a name and parameter signature but differed in their
cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this
case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers
(which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers.
This seems like something that the API should discourage, but
I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance.
Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it.
This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with
the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously,
technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang.
Just letting you know.
llvm-svn: 153168
store to 1. This allows code-gen to select a more appropriate alignment. If left
to zero, an alignment greater than the alignment of the pointer may be selected,
causing code-gen to use instructions which require an alignment greater than the
pointer guarantees.
<rdar://problem/11043589>
llvm-svn: 152951
function templates as well.
A future commit will mangle the added name with the template args
like classes are mangled.
Fixes rdar://10986010
llvm-svn: 152683
we correctly emit loads of BlockDeclRefExprs even when they
don't qualify as ODR-uses. I think I'm adequately convinced
that BlockDeclRefExpr can die.
llvm-svn: 152479
Richard Smith