We have been seeing this test fail intermittently on our
2 stage AArch64 bot.
As far back as https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/53/builds/2694
Likely due to a lack of resources at certain times on the
shared machine. Up the time limit to give us some more room.
(this limit only applies to the watchdog thread, so if the
test passes then it won't take 20s)
This test from @MaskRay comment on D69428. The patch is looking to
break this behavior. If we go with D69428 I hope we will have some
workaround for this test or include explicit test update into the patch.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100906
... so that FreeBSD specific GetTls/glibc specific pthread_self code can be
removed. This also helps FreeBSD arm64/powerpc64 which don't have GetTls
implementation yet.
GetTls is the range of
* thread control block and optional TLS_PRE_TCB_SIZE
* static TLS blocks plus static TLS surplus
On glibc, lsan requires the range to include
`pthread::{specific_1stblock,specific}` so that allocations only referenced by
`pthread_setspecific` can be scanned.
This patch uses `dl_iterate_phdr` to collect TLS blocks. Find the one
with `dlpi_tls_modid==1` as one of the initially loaded module, then find
consecutive ranges. The boundaries give us addr and size.
This allows us to drop the glibc internal `_dl_get_tls_static_info` and
`InitTlsSize`. However, huge glibc x86-64 binaries with numerous shared objects
may observe time complexity penalty, so exclude them for now. Use the simplified
method with non-Android Linux for now, but in theory this can be used with *BSD
and potentially other ELF OSes.
This removal of RISC-V `__builtin_thread_pointer` makes the code compilable with
more compiler versions (added in Clang in 2020-03, added in GCC in 2020-07).
This simplification enables D99566 for TLS Variant I architectures.
Note: as of musl 1.2.2 and FreeBSD 12.2, dlpi_tls_data returned by
dl_iterate_phdr is not desired: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254774
This can be worked around by using `__tls_get_addr({modid,0})` instead
of `dlpi_tls_data`. The workaround can be shared with the workaround for glibc<2.25.
This fixes some tests on Alpine Linux x86-64 (musl)
```
test/lsan/Linux/cleanup_in_tsd_destructor.c
test/lsan/Linux/fork.cpp
test/lsan/Linux/fork_threaded.cpp
test/lsan/Linux/use_tls_static.cpp
test/lsan/many_tls_keys_thread.cpp
test/msan/tls_reuse.cpp
```
and `test/lsan/TestCases/many_tls_keys_pthread.cpp` on glibc aarch64.
The number of sanitizer test failures does not change on FreeBSD/amd64 12.2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98926
These tests were added in:
1daa48f00559e422c90b
malloc_zero.c and realloc_too_big.c fail when only
leak sanitizer is enabled.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/59/builds/1635
(also in an armv8 32 bit build)
(I would XFAIL them but the same test is run with
address and leak sanitizer enabled and that one does
pass)
With D98926, many_tls_keys_pthread.cpp appears to be working.
On glibc 2.30-0ubuntu2, swapcontext.cpp and Linux/fork_and_leak.cpp work fine
but they strangely fail on clang-cmake-aarch64-full
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7/builds/2240).
Disable them for now.
Note: check-lsan was recently enabled on AArch64 in D98985. A test takes
10+ seconds. We should figure out the bottleneck.
`check-lsan` passed on an aarch64-*-linux machine.
Unsupport `many_tls_keys_pthread.cpp` for now: it requires GetTls to include
`specific_1stblock` and `specific` in `struct pthread`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98985
The recent suffix-log-path_test.c checks for a full stacktrace and
since on some arm-linux-gnu configuration the slow unwinder is used
on default (when the compiler emits thumb code as default), it
requires -funwind-tables on tests.
It also seems to fix the issues disable by d025df3c1d.
Reviewed By: ostannard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96337
Some tests are broken at API level 30 on AOSP-master devices. When we
change the buildbuit to API level 30, the following tests get enabled.
They're currently broken due to various issues, and so fix up those
issues.
Reviewed By: oontvoo, eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94100
This makes suppression list to work similar to __lsan_ignore_object.
Existing behavior was inconsistent and very inconvenient for complex
data structures.
Example:
struct B;
struct A { B* ptr; };
A* t = makeA();
t->ptr = makeB();
Before the patch: if makeA suppressed by suppression file, lsan will
still report the makeB() leak, so we need two suppressions.
After the patch: a single makeA suppression is enough (the same as a
single __lsan_ignore_object(t)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93884
The tests do not report the expected leak when issued with use_stack
or use_tls option equal to 0 on arm-linux-gnueabihf (ubuntu 18.04,
glibc 2.27).
This issue is being tracked by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
This commit adds an interceptor for the pthread_detach function,
calling into ThreadRegistry::DetachThread, allowing for thread contexts
to be reused.
Without this change, programs may fail when they create more than 8K
threads.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88184
X86 can use xmm registers for pointers operations. e.g. for std::swap.
I don't know yet if it's possible on other platforms.
NT_X86_XSTATE includes all registers from NT_FPREGSET so
the latter used only if the former is not available. I am not sure how
reasonable to expect that but LLD has such fallback in
NativeRegisterContextLinux_x86_64::ReadFPR.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87754
Summary:
When running the tests on a Ubuntu 18.04 machine this test is crashing for
me inside the runtime linker. My guess is that it is trying to save more
registers (possibly large vector ones) and the current stack space is not
sufficient.
Reviewers: samsonov, kcc, eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: eugenis, merge_guards_bot, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71461
Summary:
Do not grab the allocator lock before calling dl_iterate_phdr. This may
cause a lock order inversion with (valid) user code that uses malloc
inside a dl_iterate_phdr callback.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, hctim
Subscribers: jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67738
llvm-svn: 372348
Summary:
many_tls_keys_pthread.cpp for TSD
many_tls_keys_thread.cpp for TLS
The TSD test is unsupported on NetBSD as it assumes TLS used internally.
TSD on NetBSD does not use TLS.
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, mgorny, dvyukov, kcc
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67428
llvm-svn: 371757
Summary:
Combine few relatively small changes into one:
- implement internal_ptrace() and internal_clone() for NetBSD
- add support for stoptheworld based on the ptrace(2) API
- define COMPILER_RT_HAS_LSAN for NetBSD
- enable tests for NetBSD/amd64
Inspired by the original implementation by Christos Zoulas in netbsd/src for GCC.
The implementation is in theory CPU independent through well defined macros
across all NetBSD ports, however only the x86_64 version was tested.
Reviewers: mgorny, dvyukov, vitalybuka, joerg, jfb
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jfb, srhines, kubamracek, llvm-commits, christos
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64057
llvm-svn: 365735
These lit configuration files are really Python source code. Using the
.py file extension helps editors and tools use the correct language
mode. LLVM and Clang already use this convention for lit configuration,
this change simply applies it to all of compiler-rt.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63658
llvm-svn: 364591
XFAIL the tests known to fail with glibc-2.27+. This takes away
the burden of handling known failures from users, and ensures that
we will be verbosely informed when they actually start working again.
Bug report: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37804
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56062
llvm-svn: 350717
David Spickett