Adds a new ASTMatcher condition called 'hasInitStatement()' that matches if,
switch and range-for statements with an initializer. Reworked clang-tidy
readability-else-after-return to handle variables in the if condition or init
statements in c++17 ifs. Also checks if removing the else would affect object
lifetimes in the else branch.
Fixes PR44364.
Replace tidy::utils::lexer::getConstQualifyingToken with a corrected and also
generalized to other qualifiers variant - getQualifyingToken.
Fixes PR44326
Summary:
readability-redundant-member-init removes redundant / unnecessary member and base class initialization. Unfortunately for the specific case of a copy constructor's initialization of a base class, gcc at strict warning levels warns if "base class is not initialized in the copy constructor of a derived class".
This patch adds an option `IgnoreBaseInCopyConstructors` defaulting to 0 (thus maintaining current behavior by default) to skip the specific case of removal of redundant base class initialization in the copy constructor. Enabling this option enables the resulting code to continue to compile successfully under `gcc -Werror=extra`. New test cases `WithCopyConstructor1` and `WithCopyConstructor2` in clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/readability-redundant-member-init.cpp show that it removes redundant members even from copy constructors.
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, lebedev.ri
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: mgehre, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69145
Summary:
`readability-redundant-string-init` was one of several clang-tidy checks documented as failing for C++17. (The failure mode in C++17 is that it changes `std::string Name = ""`; to `std::string Name = Name;`, which actually compiles but crashes at run-time.)
Analyzing the AST with `clang -Xclang -ast-dump` showed that the outer `CXXConstructExprs` that previously held the correct SourceRange were being elided in C++17/2a, but the containing `VarDecl` expressions still had all the relevant information. So this patch changes the fix to get its source ranges from `VarDecl`.
It adds one test `std::string g = "u", h = "", i = "uuu", j = "", k;` to confirm proper warnings and fixit replacements in a single `DeclStmt` where some strings require replacement and others don't. The readability-redundant-string-init.cpp and readability-redundant-string-init-msvc.cpp tests now pass for C++11/14/17/2a.
Reviewers: gribozavr, etienneb, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: NoQ, MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, dylanmckay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238
Summary:
This patch adds a feature requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238 to enable `readability-redundant-string-init` to take a list of strings to apply the fix to rather than hard-coding `basic_string`. It adds a `StringNames` option of semicolon-delimited names of string classes to which to apply this fix. Tests ensure this works with test class out::TestString as well as std::string and std::wstring as before. It should be applicable to llvm::StringRef, QString, etc.
Note: This commit was previously reverted due to a failing unit test. That test has been fixed in this version.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, JonasToth, gribozavr2
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: gribozavr2, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69548
Summary:
This patch adds a feature requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D69238 to enable `readability-redundant-string-init` to take a list of strings to apply the fix to rather than hard-coding `basic_string`. It adds a `StringNames` option of semicolon-delimited names of string classes to which to apply this fix. Tests ensure this works with test class out::TestString as well as std::string and std::wstring as before. It should be applicable to llvm::StringRef, QString, etc.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, JonasToth, gribozavr2
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: gribozavr2, xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69548
Summary:
In addition to adding `override` wherever possible, clang-tidy's `modernize-use-override` nicely removes `virtual` when `override` or `final` is specified, and further removes override when final is specified. While this is great default behavior, when code needs to be compiled with gcc at high warning levels that include `gcc -Wsuggest-override` or `gcc -Werror=suggest-override`, clang-tidy's removal of the redundant `override` keyword causes gcc to emit a warning or error. This discrepancy / conflict has been noted by others including a comment on Stack Overflow and by Mozilla's Firefox developers.
This patch adds an AllowOverrideAndFinal option defaulting to 0 - thus preserving current behavior - that when enabled allows both `override` and `final` to co-exist, while still fixing all other issues.
The patch includes a test file verifying all combinations of virtual/override/final, and mentions the new option in the release notes.
Reviewers: alexfh, djasper, JonasToth
Patch by: poelmanc
Subscribers: JonasToth, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70165
Summary:
Finds non-static member functions that can be made ``const``
because the functions don't use ``this`` in a non-const way.
The check conservatively tries to preserve logical costness in favor of
physical costness. See readability-make-member-function-const.rst for more
details.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr, hokein, alexfh
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68074
Summary:
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
[This is analogous to LLVM r331272 and CFE r331834]
Subscribers: srhines, nemanjai, javed.absar, kbarton, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66578
llvm-svn: 369643
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Summary:
If there is no comment, place it at the closing brace of a namespace
definition. Previously it was placed at the next character after the
closing brace.
The new position produces a better location for highlighting in clangd
and does not seem to make matters worse for clang-tidy.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh, hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64861
llvm-svn: 366337
Summary:
Finds non-static member functions that can be made ``static``.
I have run this check (repeatedly) over llvm-project. It made 1708 member functions
``static``. Out of those, I had to exclude 22 via ``NOLINT`` because their address
was taken and stored in a variable of pointer-to-member type (e.g. passed to
llvm::StringSwitch).
It also made 243 member functions ``const``. (This is currently very conservative
to have no false-positives and can hopefully be extended in the future.)
You can find the results here: https://github.com/mgehre/llvm-project/commits/static_const_eval
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61749
llvm-svn: 366265
Summary:
readability-identifier-naming causes a null pointer dereference when checking an identifier introduced by a structured binding whose right hand side is an undeclared identifier.
Running the check on a file that is just the following results in a crash:
```
auto [left] = right;
```
Patch by Mark Stegeman!
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: madsravn, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62404
llvm-svn: 361809
Summary:
Fixed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40544
Before, we would generate a fixit like `(anonymous namespace)::Foo::fun();` for
the added test case.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61874
llvm-svn: 360698
Summary:
readability-redundant-declaration was diagnosing a redundant declaration
on "extern inline void f();", which is needed in C code to force an external definition
of the inline function f. (This is different to how inline behaves in C++).
Reviewers: alexfh, danielmarjamaki
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61700
llvm-svn: 360613
It now comes with a follow-up fix for the clients of this API
in clangd and clang-tidy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59977
llvm-svn: 359035
Before this patch readability-misleading-indentation could issue diagnostics
with an invalid location, which would lead to an assertion failure in
ClangTidyContext::diag()
llvm-svn: 358589
Summary:
Add a way to expand modular headers for PPCallbacks. Checks can opt-in for this
expansion by overriding the new registerPPCallbacks virtual method and
registering their PPCallbacks in the preprocessor created for this specific
purpose.
Use module expansion in the readability-identifier-naming check
Reviewers: gribozavr, usaxena95, sammccall
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: nemanjai, mgorny, xazax.hun, kbarton, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59528
llvm-svn: 356750
The readability-else-after-return check should be smarter about cases where the
variable defined in the condition is used in the `else` branch. This patch makes
it just ignore such cases, but alternative solutions may be better (added a
FIXME).
llvm-svn: 351751
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
a stray single '\r' from one file. These are the last line ending issues
I can find in the files containing parts of LLVM's file headers.
llvm-svn: 351634
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro
is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: JonasToth, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56025
llvm-svn: 350056
Summary: There is no ambiguity / information loss in this conversion
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54941
llvm-svn: 347671
When a warning is issued in a template instantiation, the check would previously
use template arguments in a note, which would result in inconsistent or
duplicate warnings (depending on how deduplication was done). This patch removes
template arguments from the note.
llvm-svn: 347652
Removed the uses of the allOf() matcher inside node matchers that are implicit
allOf(). Replaced uses of allOf() with the explicit node matcher where it makes
matchers more readable. Replace anyOf(hasName(), hasName(), ...) with the more
efficient and readable hasAnyName().
llvm-svn: 347520
This check flags function top-level const-qualified return types and suggests removing the mostly-superfluous const qualifier where possible.
Patch by Yitzhak Mandelbaum.
llvm-svn: 345764
Summary:
This patch introduces a new clang-tidy check that matches on all `declStmt` that declare more then one variable
and transform them into one statement per declaration if possible.
It currently only focusses on variable declarations but should be extended to cover more kinds of declarations in the future.
It is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D27621 and does use it's extensive test-suite. Thank you to firolino for his work!
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, kbobyrev
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: ZaMaZaN4iK, mgehre, nemanjai, kbarton, lebedev.ri, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51949
llvm-svn: 345735
Summary:
Detects when the integral literal or floating point (decimal or hexadecimal)
literal has non-uppercase suffix, and suggests to make the suffix uppercase,
with fix-it.
All valid combinations of suffixes are supported.
```
auto x = 1; // OK, no suffix.
auto x = 1u; // warning: integer literal suffix 'u' is not upper-case
auto x = 1U; // OK, suffix is uppercase.
...
```
This is a re-commit, the original was reverted by me in
rL345305 due to discovered bugs. (implicit code, template instantiation)
Tests were added, and the bugs were fixed.
I'm unable to find any further bugs, hopefully there aren't any..
References:
* [[ https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87152241 | CERT DCL16-C ]]
* MISRA C:2012, 7.3 - The lowercase character "l" shall not be used in a literal suffix
* MISRA C++:2008, 2-13-4 - Literal suffixes shall be upper case
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670
llvm-svn: 345381
There are some lurking issues with the handling of the SourceManager.
Somehow sometimes we end up extracting completely wrong
portions of the source buffer.
Reverts r344772, r44760, r344758, r344755.
llvm-svn: 345305
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53454
llvm-svn: 344871
Summary:
Detects when the integral literal or floating point (decimal or hexadecimal)
literal has non-uppercase suffix, and suggests to make the suffix uppercase,
with fix-it.
All valid combinations of suffixes are supported.
```
auto x = 1; // OK, no suffix.
auto x = 1u; // warning: integer literal suffix 'u' is not upper-case
auto x = 1U; // OK, suffix is uppercase.
...
```
References:
* [[ https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87152241 | CERT DCL16-C ]]
* MISRA C:2012, 7.3 - The lowercase character "l" shall not be used in a literal suffix
* MISRA C++:2008, 2-13-4 - Literal suffixes shall be upper case
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52670
llvm-svn: 344755
Summary:
Option to check for different naming conventions on the following types:
- GlobalConstantPointer
- GlobalPointer
- LocalConstantPointer
- LocalPointer
- PointerParameter
- ConstantPointerParameter
When not specified, the conventions for the non pointer types will be applied (GlobalConstant, GlobalVariable, LocalConstant, ...).
Patch by ffigueras!
Reviewers: alexfh, kbobyrev
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52882
llvm-svn: 343788
findStyleKind is only called if D is an explicit identifier with a name,
so the checks for operators will never return true. The explicit assert()
enforces this invariant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52179
llvm-svn: 342514
Summary:
The goal is to reduce false positives when the difference is intentional, like:
foo(StringRef name);
foo(StringRef name_ref) {
string name = cleanup(name_ref);
...
}
Or semantically unimportant, like:
foo(StringRef full_name);
foo(StringRef name) { ... }
There are other matching names we won't recognise (e.g. syns vs synonyms) but
this catches many that we see in practice, and gives people a systematic
workaround.
The old behavior is available as a 'Strict' option.
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49285
llvm-svn: 336992
bool foo(A &S) {
if (S != (A)S)
return false;
return true;
}
is fixed into (w/o this patch)
...
return !S != (A)S; // negotiation affects first operand only
}
instead of (with this patch)
...
return S == (A)S; // note == instead of !=
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47122
llvm-svn: 333003
Currently, diagnoses code that calls container.data()[some_index] when the container exposes a suitable operator[]() method that can be used directly.
Patch by Shuai Wang.
llvm-svn: 332519
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44976
llvm-svn: 332371
Summary: using ivar in class extension is not supported in 32-bit architecture of MacOS.
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45912
llvm-svn: 330559
This commit has been breaking most bots for a day now. There is a fix
proposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45912 but when I applied that
I just got different errors. Reverting to get our bots back to green.
llvm-svn: 330528
Summary:
Pretty straight-forward, just count all the variable declarations in the function's body, and if more than the configured threshold - do complain.
Note that this continues perverse practice of disabling the new option by default.
I'm not certain where is the balance point between not being too noisy, and actually enforcing the good practice.
If we really want to not disable this by default, but also to not cause too many new warnings, we could default to 50 or so.
But that is a lot of variables too...
I was able to find one coding style referencing variable count:
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.15/process/coding-style.html#functions
> Another measure of the function is the number of local variables. They shouldn’t exceed 5-10, or you’re doing something wrong.
Reviewers: hokein, xazax.hun, JonasToth, aaron.ballman, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: kimgr, Eugene.Zelenko, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44602
llvm-svn: 329902
Summary:
Many architectures provide SIMD operations (e.g. x86 SSE/AVX, Power AltiVec/VSX,
ARM NEON). It is common that SIMD code implementing the same algorithm, is
written in multiple target-dispatching pieces to optimize for different
architectures or micro-architectures.
The C++ standard proposal P0214 and its extensions cover many common SIMD
operations. By migrating from target-dependent intrinsics to P0214 operations,
the SIMD code can be simplified and pieces for different targets can be unified.
Refer to http://wg21.link/p0214 for introduction and motivation for the
data-parallel standard library.
Subscribers: klimek, aemerson, mgorny, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, hintonda, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42983
llvm-svn: 325272
Summary:
Fixes bug 34701
When we encounter a namespace find the location of the left bracket.
Then if the text between the name and the left bracket contains a ':'
then it's a C++17 nested namespace.
Reviewers: #clang-tools-extra, alexfh, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits, krasimir, JonasToth, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Patch by Alexandru Octavian Buțiu!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38284
llvm-svn: 322274
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, piotrdz, hokein, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716
llvm-svn: 321913
Summary:
They are not locally const qualified so they weren't classified as
constants by the readability-identifier-naming check.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Patch by Beren Minor!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39363
llvm-svn: 320406
Summary:
The readability-else-after-return check was not warning about
an else after a throw of an exception that had arguments that needed
to be cleaned up.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, klimek, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40505
llvm-svn: 319174
This check is relatively simple, and is often being used
as an example. I'm aware of at least two cases, when
simply copying the FunctionASTVisitor class to a new
check resulted in a rather unobvious segfault. Having it
in anonymous namespace prevents such a problem.
No functionality change, so i opted to avoid phabricator,
especially since clang-tidy reviews are seriously jammed.
llvm-svn: 312912
Summary:
This patch renames checks, check options and changes messages to use correct
term "implicit conversion" instead of "implicit cast" (which has been in use in
Clang AST since ~10 years, but it's still technically incorrect w.r.t. C++
standard).
* performance-implicit-cast-in-loop -> performance-implicit-conversion-in-loop
* readability-implicit-bool-cast -> readability-implicit-bool-conversion
- readability-implicit-bool-cast.AllowConditionalIntegerCasts ->
readability-implicit-bool-conversion.AllowIntegerConditions
- readability-implicit-bool-cast.AllowConditionalPointerCasts ->
readability-implicit-bool-conversion.AllowPointerConditions
Reviewers: hokein, jdennett
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, JDevlieghere, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36456
llvm-svn: 310366
Use getAnyMember() instead of getMember() to avoid crash on anonymous
structs/unions.
Don't warn about initializing members of an anonymous union.
Fixes PR32966.
Reviewed by alexfh.
llvm-svn: 309668
Summary:
A followup for D32942.
Malcolm Parsons has provided a valid testcase that the initial version of the check complained about nested `if`'s.
As it turns out, the culprit is the **partially** un-intentional `switch` fallthrough.
So rewrite the NestingThreshold logic without ab-using+mis-using that switch with fallthrough, and add testcases with nested `if`' where there should be a warning and shouldn't be a warning. This results in a cleaner, simpler code, too.
I guess, now it would be actually possible to pick some reasonable default for `NestingThreshold` setting.
Fixes PR33454.
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons, alexfh
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: sbenza, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34202
llvm-svn: 305554
Summary:
Finds compound statements which create next nesting level after `NestingThreshold` and emits a warning.
Do note that it warns about each compound statement that breaches the threshold, but not any of it's sub-statements, to have readable warnings.
I was able to find only one coding style referencing nesting:
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/coding-style.html#indentation
> In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added benefit of warning you when you’re nesting your functions too deep.
This seems too basic, i'm not sure what else to test. Are more tests needed?
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, sbenza
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32942
llvm-svn: 305082
Nathan James