While these might make sense for some rule (e.g. break after multi-line
operand), they generally appear ugly and confusing.
Before:
fffffffffff(R\"x(
multiline raw string literal xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
)x\" + bbbbbb)
After:
fffffffffff(R\"x(
multiline raw string literal xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
)x\" +
bbbbbb)
llvm-svn: 204937
correctly order comments in SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit() order
Unfortunately, this is not as simple as it was implemented previously, and
actually requires doing a merge sort.
llvm-svn: 204936
This produces valid IR now that llvm rejects aliases to weak aliases and warns
the user that the resolution is not changed if the weak alias is overridden.
llvm-svn: 204935
Store the number of clauses and children of OMPExecutableDirective and dynamically compute the locations of corresponding arrays.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2977
llvm-svn: 204933
These don't seem to have any real point. Let's start with
IndexingContext. I can't come up with any conceivable reason to have
many hundereds of thousands of these alive in an address space which
would make the 4x difference in allocated (but unused) memory for the
string scratch buffer a significant memory usage problem.
The EditedSource one is somewhat more surprising. This is an 8x increase
in the memory allocated (but not used) per editted source file. However,
for this to realistically be a problem, you would need to have over half
a million editted source files in a single address space, and even that
would only really have problems on 32-bit Windows where you really only
have 2gb of virtual address space. And what's more important, the fix to
this if it is actually an issue shouldn't be to shrink the allocator's
size, it is to pass a single allocator into *many* edited source file
objects and let them share the memory.
These were the only two uses of custom sized BumpPtrAllocators
(excluding ones in the JIT using a custom allocation strategy) in all of
LLVM, Clang, LLD, LLDB, or Polly. I don't think we actually need this
complexity in the primary BumpPtrAllocator at all and am planning to
remove it.
llvm-svn: 204910
When parsing MS inline assembly, we note that fpsw is an implicit def of
most x87 FP operations, and add it to the clobber list. However, we
don't recognize fpsw as a gcc register name, and we assert. Clang
always adds an fpsr clobber, which means the same thing to LLVM, so we
can just use that.
This test case was broken by my LLVM change r196939.
Reviewers: echristo
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2993
llvm-svn: 204878
instead of rolling an inefficient version of the function. This
changes some order of emission of metadata nodes, fix up those
testcases and make them more flexible to some changes.
llvm-svn: 204874
This commit fixes a cast instruction assertion failure
due to the incompatible type cast. This will only happen when
the target requires atomic libcalls.
llvm-svn: 204834
Add M_ZERO awareness to malloc() static analysis in Clang for FreeBSD,
NetBSD, and OpenBSD in a similar fashion to O_CREAT for open(2).
These systems have a three-argument malloc() in the kernel where the
third argument contains flags; the M_ZERO flag will zero-initialize the
allocated buffer.
This should reduce the number of false positives when running static
analysis on BSD kernels.
Additionally, add kmalloc() (Linux kernel malloc()) and treat __GFP_ZERO
like M_ZERO on Linux.
Future work involves a better method of checking for named flags without
hardcoding values.
Patch by Conrad Meyer, with minor modifications by me.
llvm-svn: 204832
Hopefully addresses r204539.
Make clang/test/lit.cfg pre-scan the RUN line looking for tool names,
and substitute fully qualified path names pointing to the build
directory. This ensures we're testing the just-built tools.
llvm-svn: 204831
The main difference between __va_start and __builtin_va_start is that
the address of the va_list has already been taken, and the va_list is
always a char*.
__va_end and __va_arg are not needed.
llvm-svn: 204821
Summary:
This allows them to be used without -cc1 the same way as -I and -isystem.
Renamed the options to --system-header-prefix=/--no-system-header-prefix to avoid interference with -isystem and make the intent of the option cleaner.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3185
llvm-svn: 204775
Conceptually one of these loops is just a while-loop, but the actual code-gen
is more complicated. We don't instrument all the different control flow edges
to get accurate counts for each conditional branch, nor do I think it makes
sense to do so. Instead, make the simplifying assumption that the loop behaves
like a while-loop. Use the same branch weights for the first check for an
empty collection as would be used for the back-edge of a while loop, and use
that same weighting for the innermost loop, ignoring the possibility that there
may be some extra code to go fetch more elements.
llvm-svn: 204767
In gcc using -Ofast forces linking of crtfastmath.o.
In the current clang crtfastmath.o is only linked when -ffast-math/-funsafe-math-optimizations passed. It can lead to performance issues, when using only -Ofast without explicit -ffast-math (I faced with it).
My patch fixes inconsistency with gcc behaviour and also introduces few tests on it.
Patch by Zinovy Nis!
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3114
llvm-svn: 204742
A refinement of r198953 to handle cases where an object is accessed both through
a property getter and through direct ivar access. An object accessed through a
property should always be treated as +0, i.e. not owned by the caller. However,
an object accessed through an ivar may be at +0 or at +1, depending on whether
the ivar is a strong reference. Outside of ARC, we don't have that information,
so we just don't track objects accessed through ivars.
With this change, accessing an ivar directly will deliberately override the +0
provided by a getter, but only if the +0 hasn't participated in other retain
counting yet. That isn't perfect, but it's already unusual for people to be
mixing property access with direct ivar access. (The primary use case for this
is in setters, init methods, and -dealloc.)
Thanks to Ted for spotting a few mistakes in private review.
<rdar://problem/16333368>
llvm-svn: 204730
Manuel Klimek