This is useful for e.g. highlighting purposes in an IDE.
Note: First version of this patch was reverted due to failing tests in
opencl-types.cl with -target ppc64le-unknown-linux. These tests are
adapted now.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40072
llvm-svn: 321794
This one was rolled back as follow-up to the failing commit.
Second try.
For the function declaration
auto foo5(Foo) -> Foo;
the parameter tokens were mapped to cursors representing the
FunctionDecl:
Keyword: "auto" [1:1 - 1:5] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "test5" [1:6 - 1:11] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Punctuation: "(" [1:11 - 1:12] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "X" [1:12 - 1:13] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6 // Ops, not a TypeRef
Punctuation: ")" [1:13 - 1:14] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Punctuation: "->" [1:15 - 1:17] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "X" [1:18 - 1:19] TypeRef=struct X:7:8
Punctuation: ";" [1:19 - 1:20]
Fix this by ensuring that the trailing return type is not visited as
first.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40561
llvm-svn: 321709
This broke test/Index/opencl-types.cl on several buildbots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-aarch64-lld/builds/3294http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/6498http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/5239
> [libclang] Support querying whether a declaration is invalid
>
> This is useful for e.g. highlighting purposes in an IDE.
>
> Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40072
Also reverting follow-ups that otherwise caused conflicts for the
revert:
r321700 "Fix line endings."
r321701 "Fix more line endings."
r321698 "[libclang] Fix cursors for functions with trailing return type"
> For the function declaration
>
> auto foo5(Foo) -> Foo;
> the parameter tokens were mapped to cursors representing the
> FunctionDecl:
>
> Keyword: "auto" [1:1 - 1:5] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
> Identifier: "test5" [1:6 - 1:11] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
> Punctuation: "(" [1:11 - 1:12] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
> Identifier: "X" [1:12 - 1:13] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6 // Ops, not a TypeRef
> Punctuation: ")" [1:13 - 1:14] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
> Punctuation: "->" [1:15 - 1:17] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
> Identifier: "X" [1:18 - 1:19] TypeRef=struct X:7:8
> Punctuation: ";" [1:19 - 1:20]
>
> Fix this by ensuring that the trailing return type is not visited as
> first.
>
> Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40561
llvm-svn: 321708
For the function declaration
auto foo5(Foo) -> Foo;
the parameter tokens were mapped to cursors representing the
FunctionDecl:
Keyword: "auto" [1:1 - 1:5] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "test5" [1:6 - 1:11] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Punctuation: "(" [1:11 - 1:12] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "X" [1:12 - 1:13] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6 // Ops, not a TypeRef
Punctuation: ")" [1:13 - 1:14] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Punctuation: "->" [1:15 - 1:17] FunctionDecl=test5:1:6
Identifier: "X" [1:18 - 1:19] TypeRef=struct X:7:8
Punctuation: ";" [1:19 - 1:20]
Fix this by ensuring that the trailing return type is not visited as
first.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40561
llvm-svn: 321698
This is useful for e.g. highlighting purposes in an IDE.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40072
llvm-svn: 321697
Summary:
Previsouly clang tried instantiating member initializers even if ctor
body was skipped, this caused spurious errors (see the test).
Reviewers: sepavloff, klimek
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41492
llvm-svn: 321520
Summary:
- Fixed an assert in Sema::InstantiateFunctionDefinition and added
support for instantiating a function template with skipped body.
- Properly call setHasSkippedBody for FunctionTemplateDecl passed to
Sema::ActOnSkippedFunctionBody.
Reviewers: sepavloff, bkramer
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41237
llvm-svn: 321174
This patch allows checking whether a C++ record declaration is abstract through
libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
Patch by Johann Klähn!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36952
llvm-svn: 320748
Summary:
This fixes an invalid warning about missing definition of a function when
parsing with SkipFunctionBodies=true
Reviewers: bkramer, sepavloff
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41189
llvm-svn: 320696
As reported in llvm bugzilla 32377.
Here’s a patch to add preinclude of stdc-predef.h.
The gcc documentation says “On GNU/Linux, <stdc-predef.h> is pre-included.” See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html;
The preinclude is inhibited with –ffreestanding.
Basically I fixed the failing test cases by adding –ffreestanding which inhibits this behavior.
I fixed all the failing tests, including some in extra/test, there's a separate patch for that which is linked here
Note: this is a recommit after a test failure took down the original (r318669)
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
llvm-svn: 320391
requested by client
This is a follow up to r319702 which records parsing invocations.
These files are not emitted by default, and the client has to specify the
invocation emission path first.
rdar://35322543
llvm-svn: 320085
Storing the contents of unsaved files is too expensive.
Instead a hash is stored with a record invocation. When a reproducer is
generated, Clang will compare the stored hashes to the new hashes to determine
if the contents of a file has changed. This way we'll know when a reproducer was
generated for a different source to the one that triggered the original crash.
rdar://35322543
llvm-svn: 319729
by client
This patch extends libclang by allowing it to record parsing operations to a
temporary JSON file. The file is deleted after parsing succeeds. When a crash
happens during parsing, the file is preserved and the client will be able to use
it to generate a reproducer for the crash.
These files are not emitted by default, and the client has to specify the
invocation emission path first.
rdar://35322543
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40527
llvm-svn: 319702
As reported in llvm bugzilla 32377.
Here’s a patch to add preinclude of stdc-predef.h.
The gcc documentation says “On GNU/Linux, <stdc-predef.h> is pre-included.”
See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html;
The preinclude is inhibited with –ffreestanding.
Basically I fixed the failing test cases by adding –ffreestanding which inhibits
this behavior.
I fixed all the failing tests, including some in extra/test, there's a separate
patch for that which is linked here
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
llvm-svn: 318669
The 'decl' role is more canonical than the 'ref'. This helps us establish the
'specialization-of' relation just by looking at decls or defs.
rdar://31884960
llvm-svn: 317832
Summary:
Adjusted PrintingPolicy inside code completion to avoid printing some
redundant name qualifiers.
Before this change, typedefs that were written unqualified in source
code were printed with qualifiers in completion. For example, in the
following code
struct foo {
typedef int type;
type method();
};
completion item for `method` had return type of `foo::type`, even
though the original code used `type` without qualifiers.
After this change, the completion item has return type `type`, as
originally written in the source code.
Note that this change does not suppress qualifiers written by the
user. For example, in the following code
typedef int type;
struct foo {
typedef int type;
::type method(foo::type);
};
completion item for `method` has return type of `::type` and
parameter type of `foo::type`, as originally written in the source
code.
Reviewers: arphaman, bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38538
llvm-svn: 317677
When a preamble ends in a conditional preprocessor block that is being
skipped, the preprocessor needs to continue skipping that block when
the preamble is used.
This fixes PR34570.
llvm-svn: 317308
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33904
Happens when static function is accessed via the class variable. That leads to incorrect overloads number because the variable is considered as the first argument.
struct Bar {
static void foo(); static void foo(int);
};
int main() {
Bar b;
b.foo(/*complete here*/); // did not work before
Bar::foo(/*complete here*/); // worked fine
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36390
llvm-svn: 316646
With enabled CINDEXTEST_CODE_COMPLETE_PATTERNS env option (which enables
IncludeCodePatterns in completion options) code completion after colon
currently suggests access modifiers with 2 completion chunks which is
incorrect.
Example:
class A : <Cursor>B
{
}
Currently we get 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public}{Colon :} (40)'
but the correct line is just 'NotImplemented:{TypedText public} (40)'
The fix introduces more specific scope that occurs between ':' and '{'
It allows us to determine when we don't need to add ':' as a second
chunk to the public/protected/private access modifiers.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38618
llvm-svn: 316436
Summary: Previously, `VisitAttributes` was not called for function and class templates and thus their attributes were not accessible using libclang.
Reviewers: bkramer, arphaman, rsmith, jbcoe
Reviewed By: jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Patch by jklaehn (Johann Klähn)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36955
llvm-svn: 315958
Move the logic for determining the `wchar_t` type information into the
driver. Rather than passing the single bit of information of
`-fshort-wchar` indicate to the frontend the desired type of `wchar_t`
through a new `-cc1` option of `-fwchar-type` and indicate the
signedness through `-f{,no-}signed-wchar`. This replicates the current
logic which was spread throughout Basic into the
`RenderCharacterOptions`.
Most of the changes to the tests are to ensure that the frontend uses
the correct type. Add a new test set under `test/Driver/wchar_t.c` to
ensure that we calculate the proper types for the various cases.
llvm-svn: 315126
This addresses two sources of inconsistency in test configuration
files.
1. Substitution boundaries. Previously you would specify a
substitution, such as 'lli', and then additionally a set
of characters that should fail to match before and after
the tool. This was used, for example, so that matches that
are parts of full paths would not be replaced. But not all
tools did this, and those that did would often re-invent
the set of characters themselves, leading to inconsistency.
Now, every tool substitution defaults to using a sane set
of reasonable defaults and you have to explicitly opt out
of it. This actually fixed a few latent bugs that were
never being surfaced, but only on accident.
2. There was no standard way for the system to decide how to
locate a tool. Sometimes you have an explicit path, sometimes
we would search for it and build up a path ourselves, and
sometimes we would build up a full command line. Furthermore,
there was no standardized way to handle missing tools. Do we
warn, fail, ignore, etc? All of this is now encapsulated in
the ToolSubst class. You either specify an exact command to
run, or an instance of FindTool('<tool-name>') and everything
else just works. Furthermore, you can specify an action to
take if the tool cannot be resolved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38565
llvm-svn: 315085
Summary:
It will move destructors and operators to the end of completion list.
Destructors and operators are currently very high on the completion
list, as they have the same priority as member functions. However,
they are clearly not something users usually choose in completion
lists.
Reviewers: arphaman, erikjv, bkramer, krasimir
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: eraman, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38081
llvm-svn: 314019
Summary:
ObjC classes have two associated symbols, one for the class and one for the
metaclass.
This change overloads `CodegenNameGenerator::getAllManglings` to produce both
class and metaclass symbols.
While this function is called by `clang_Cursor_getCXXManglings`, it's only
called for CXXRecordDecl and CXXMethodDecl, and so libclang's behavior is
unchanged.
Reviewers: arphaman, abdulras, alexshap, compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37671
llvm-svn: 313997
Summary:
This fixes PR34547.
`Lexer::LexEndOfFile` handles recording of ConditionalStack for
preamble and reporting errors about unmatched conditionalal PP
directives.
However, SkipExcludedConditionalBlock contianed duplicated logic for
reporting errors and clearing ConditionalStack, but not for preamble
recording.
This fix removes error reporting logic from
`SkipExcludedConditionalBlock`, unmatched PP conditionals are now
reported inside `Lexer::LexEndOfFile`.
Reviewers: erikjv, klimek, bkramer
Reviewed By: erikjv
Subscribers: nik, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37700
llvm-svn: 313014
This patch teaches the preprocessor to report more precise source ranges for
code that is skipped due to conditional directives.
The new behavior includes the '#' from the opening directive and the full text
of the line containing the closing directive in the skipped area. This matches
up clang's behavior (we don't IRGen the code between the closing "endif" and
the end of a line).
This also affects the code coverage implementation. See llvm.org/PR34166 (this
also happens to be rdar://problem/23224058).
The old behavior (report the end of the skipped range as the end
location of the 'endif' token) is preserved for indexing clients.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36642
llvm-svn: 312947
In case of copy constructor is implicitly deleted it's still shown.
PR34402 describes a way to reproduce that.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37435
llvm-svn: 312785
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
(This is the fixed version of r 311442, which was reverted in r311445.)
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 312780
When we have enabled cache for global completions we did not have
diagnostics for Bar and could not complete Ba as in provided code
example.
template <typename T>
struct Foo { T member; };
template<typename T> using Bar = Foo<T>;
int main() {
Ba
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35355
llvm-svn: 311442
Summary:
The crash occurs when the first token after a preamble is a macro
expansion.
Fixed by moving replayPreambleConditionalStack from Parser into
Preprocessor. It is now called right after the predefines file is
processed.
Reviewers: erikjv, bkramer, klimek, yvvan
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36872
llvm-svn: 311330
In dependent contexts we end up referencing these, so make sure they
have USRs, and have their declarations indexed. For the most part they
behave like typedefs, but we also need to worry about having multiple
using declarations with the same "name".
rdar://problem/33883650
llvm-svn: 311053
Ivan Donchevskii