The issue was introduced by D33189 which fixed PR33189.
Fixes PR38671: "destructor cannot be declared as a template" leads to segfault in Sema::LookupSpecialMember
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69225
Summary:
This patch aims to fix the bug reported at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33189. Clang hits an assertion
when a template destructor declaration is present. This is caused by
later processing that does not expect to encounter a template when
looking at a destructor. The resolution is to treat the destructor as
being not declared when later processing is interested in the properties
of the destructor of a class.
Reviewers: rcraik, hubert.reinterpretcast, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33833
Patch by Kuang He!
llvm-svn: 306905
We were transforming the scope type of a pseudo-destructor expression
(e.g., the first T in x->T::~T()) as a freestanding type, which meant
that dependent template specialization types here would stay dependent
even when no template parameters were named. This would eventually
mean that a dependent expression would end up in what should be
fully-instantiated ASTs, causing IRgen to assert.
llvm-svn: 176723
expressions that look like pseudo-destructors, e.g.,
p->T::~T()
where p has dependent type.
At template instantiate time, we determine whether we actually have a
pseudo-destructor or a member access, and funnel down to the
appropriate routine in Sema.
Fixes PR6380.
llvm-svn: 97092
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Mark de Wever