Summary:
JumpThreading shouldn't duplicate a convergent call, because that would move a convergent call into a control-inequivalent location. For example,
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
convergent_call();
if (cond) {
...
} else {
...
}
should not be optimized to
if (cond) {
...
convergent_call();
...
} else {
...
convergent_call();
...
}
Test Plan: test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll
Patch by Xuetian Weng.
Reviewers: resistor, arsenm, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12484
llvm-svn: 246415
handle more allocas with loads past the end of the alloca.
I suspect there are some related crashers with slightly different
patterns, but I'll fix those and add test cases as I find them.
Thanks to David Majnemer for the excellent test case reduction here.
Made this super simple to debug and fix.
llvm-svn: 246289
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 246243
... and move it into LoopUtils where it can be used by other passes, just like ReductionDescriptor. The API is very similar to ReductionDescriptor - that is, not very nice at all. Sorting these both out will come in a followup.
NFC
llvm-svn: 246145
A release fence acts as a publication barrier for stores within the current thread to become visible to other threads which might observe the release fence. It does not require the current thread to observe stores performed on other threads. As a result, we can allow store-load and load-store forwarding across a release fence.
We do need to make sure that stores before the fence can't be eliminated even if there's another store to the same location after the fence. In theory, we could reorder the second store above the fence and *then* eliminate the former, but we can't do this if the stores are on opposite sides of the fence.
Note: While more aggressive then what's there, this patch is still implementing a really conservative ordering. In particular, I'm not trying to exploit undefined behavior via races, or the fact that the LangRef says only 'atomic' accesses are ordered w.r.t. fences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11434
llvm-svn: 246134
When computing base pointers, we introduce new instructions to propagate the base of existing instructions which might not be bases. However, the algorithm doesn't make any effort to recognize when the new instruction to be inserted is the same as an existing one already in the IR. Since this is happening immediately before rewriting, we don't really have a chance to fix it after the pass runs without teaching loop passes about statepoints.
I'm really not thrilled with this patch. I've rewritten it 4 different ways now, but this is the best I've come up with. The case where the new instruction is just the original base defining value could be merged into the existing algorithm with some complexity. The problem is that we might have something like an extractelement from a phi of two vectors. It may be trivially obvious that the base of the 0th element is an existing instruction, but I can't see how to make the algorithm itself figure that out. Thus, I resort to the call to SimplifyInstruction instead.
Note that we can only adjust the instructions we've inserted ourselves. The live sets are still being tracked in side structures at this point in the code. We can't easily muck with instructions which might be in them. Long term, I'm really thinking we need to materialize the live pointer sets explicitly in the IR somehow rather than using side structures to track them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12004
llvm-svn: 246133
This was only added to preserve the old ScalarRepl's use of SSAUpdater
which was originally to avoid use of dominance frontiers. Now, we only
need a domtree, and we'll need a domtree right after this pass as well
and so it makes perfect sense to always and only use the dom-tree
powered mem2reg. This was flag-flipper earlier and has stuck reasonably
so I wanted to gut the now-dead code out of SROA before we waste more
time with it. Among other things, this will make passmanager porting
easier.
llvm-svn: 246028
Eventually, we will need sample profiles to be incorporated into the
inliner's cost models. To do this, we need the sample profile pass to
be a module pass.
This patch makes no functional changes beyond the mechanical adjustments
needed to run SampleProfile as a module pass.
llvm-svn: 245940
and make it always preserve debug locations, since all callers wanted this
behavior anyway.
This is addressing a post-commit review feedback for r245589.
NFC (inside the LLVM tree).
llvm-svn: 245622
Summary:
Refactor, NFC
Extracts computeOverflowForSignedAdd and isKnownNonNegative from NaryReassociate to ValueTracking in case
others need it.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11313
llvm-svn: 245591
Instruction::dropUnknownMetadata(KnownSet) is supposed to preserve all
metadata in KnownSet, but the condition for DebugLocs was inverted.
Most users of dropUnknownMetadata() actually worked around this by not
adding LLVMContext::MD_dbg to their list of KnowIDs.
This is now made explicit.
llvm-svn: 245589
Caught by the famous "DebugLoc describes the currect SubProgram" assertion.
When GVN is removing a nonlocal load it updates the debug location of the
SSA value it replaced the load with with the one of the load. In the
testcase this actually overwrites a valid debug location with an empty one.
In reality GVN has to make an arbitrary choice between two equally valid
debug locations. This patch changes to behavior to only update the
location if the value doesn't already have a debug location.
llvm-svn: 245588
Since Ashutosh made findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop public, we can clean this
up.
Now clients that don't compute DefsUsedOutsideOfLoop can just call
versionLoop() and computing DefsUsedOutsideOfLoop will happen
implicitly. With that there is no reason to expose addPHINodes anymore.
Ashutosh, you can now drop the calls to findDefsUsedOutsideOfLoop and
addPHINodes in LVerLICM and things should just work.
llvm-svn: 245579
Usually DSE is not supposed to remove lifetime intrinsics, but it's
actually ok to remove them for dead objects in terminating blocks,
because they convey no extra information there. Until we hit a lifetime
start that cannot be removed, that is. Because from that point on the
lifetime intrinsics become interesting again, e.g. for stack coloring.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11710
llvm-svn: 245542
After hitting @llvm.assume(X) we can:
- propagate equality that X == true
- if X is icmp/fcmp (with eq operation), and one of operand
is constant we can change all variables with constants in the same BasicBlock
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11918
llvm-svn: 245265
PR24469 resulted because DeleteDeadInstruction in handleNonLocalStoreDeletion was
deleting the next basic block iterator. Fixed the same by resetting the basic block iterator
post call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
llvm-svn: 245195
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.
I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.
But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.
To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.
To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.
With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063
llvm-svn: 245193
Some personality routines require funclet exit points to be clearly
marked, this is done by producing a token at the funclet pad and
consuming it at the corresponding ret instruction. CleanupReturnInst
already had a spot for this operand but CatchReturnInst did not.
Other personality routines don't need to use this which is why it has
been made optional.
llvm-svn: 245149
This seems to only work some of the time. In some situations,
this seems to use a nonsensical type and isn't actually aware of the
memory being accessed. e.g. if branch condition is an icmp of a pointer,
it checks the addressing mode of i1.
llvm-svn: 245137
This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types".
The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value
whose provenance cannot be obscured.
There are several applications for such a type but my immediate
motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a
single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of
optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry
block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two
cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands
inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we
came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of
BasicBlocks.
Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point"
and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad
yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret.
The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the
Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two
points.
What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already
paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we
are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for
such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer
that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me
the impression that this will not be heroic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861
llvm-svn: 245029
Summary:
This patch implements my promised optimization to reunites certain sexts from
operands after we extract the constant offset. See the header comment of
reuniteExts for its motivation.
One key building block that enables this optimization is Bjarke's poison value
analysis (D11212). That helps to prove "a +nsw b" can't overflow.
Reviewers: broune
Subscribers: jholewinski, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12016
llvm-svn: 245003
AliasAnalysis in LoopIdiomRecognize.
The previous commit to LIR, r244879, exposed some scary bug in the loop
pass pipeline with an assert failure that showed up on several bots.
This patch got reverted as part of getting that revision reverted, but
they're actually independent and unrelated. This patch has no functional
change and should be completely safe. It is also useful for my current
work on the AA infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 244993
We used to be over-conservative about preserving inbounds. Actually, the second
GEP (which applies the constant offset) can inherit the inbounds attribute of
the original GEP, because the resultant pointer is equivalent to that of the
original GEP. For example,
x = GEP inbounds a, i+5
=>
y = GEP a, i // inbounds removed
x = GEP inbounds y, 5 // inbounds preserved
llvm-svn: 244937
DeadStoreElimination does eliminate a store if it stores a value which was loaded from the same memory location.
So far this worked only if the store is in the same block as the load.
Now we can also handle stores which are in a different block than the load.
Example:
define i32 @test(i1, i32*) {
entry:
%l2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4
br i1 %0, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
br label %bb3
bb2:
; This store is redundant
store i32 %l2, i32* %1, align 4
br label %bb3
bb3:
ret i32 0
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11854
llvm-svn: 244901
Jingyue Wu