that later ones do not override the previous ones.
If we have:
@class Foo, Bar;
source ranges for both start at '@', so 'Bar' will end up overriding
'Foo' even though the cursor location was at 'Foo'.
rdar://11257578
llvm-svn: 154873
the MCJIT execution engine.
The GDB JIT debugging integration support works by registering a loaded
object image with a pre-defined function that GDB will monitor if GDB
is attached. GDB integration support is implemented for ELF only at this
time. This integration requires GDB version 7.0 or newer.
Patch by Andy Kaylor!
llvm-svn: 154868
both fallthrough and a conditional branch target the same successor.
Gracefully delete the conditional branch and introduce any unconditional
branch needed to reach the actual successor. This fixes memory
corruption in 2009-06-15-RegScavengerAssert.ll and possibly other tests.
Also, while I'm here fix a latent bug I spotted by inspection. I never
applied the same fundamental fix to this fallthrough successor finding
logic that I did to the logic used when there are no conditional
branches. As a consequence it would have selected landing pads had they
be aligned in just the right way here. I don't have a test case as
I spotted this by inspection, and the previous time I found this
required have of TableGen's source code to produce it. =/ I hate backend
bugs. ;]
Thanks to Jim Grosbach for helping me reason through this and reviewing
the fix.
llvm-svn: 154867
A trailing comma means no argument at all (i.e., as if the comma were not
present), not an empty argument to the invokee.
rdar://11252521
llvm-svn: 154863
the pre-flight code gets executed during setUp() after the debugger instance is available
and the post-flight code gets executed during tearDown() after the debugger instance has
done killing the inferior and deleting all the target programs.
Example:
[11:32:48] johnny:/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT/test $ ./dotest.py -A x86_64 -v -c ../examples/test/.lldb-pre-post-flight functionalities/watchpoint/hello_watchpoint
config: {'pre_flight': <function pre_flight at 0x1098541b8>, 'post_flight': <function post_flight at 0x109854230>}
LLDB build dir: /Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT/build/Debug
LLDB-139
Path: /Volumes/data/lldb/svn/ToT
URL: https://johnny@llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lldb/trunk
Repository Root: https://johnny@llvm.org/svn/llvm-project
Repository UUID: 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Revision: 154753
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: gclayton
Last Changed Rev: 154730
Last Changed Date: 2012-04-13 18:42:46 -0700 (Fri, 13 Apr 2012)
lldb.pre_flight: def pre_flight(test):
__import__("lldb")
__import__("lldbtest")
print "\nRunning pre-flight function:"
print "for test case:", test
lldb.post_flight: def post_flight(test):
__import__("lldb")
__import__("lldbtest")
print "\nRunning post-flight function:"
print "for test case:", test
Session logs for test failures/errors/unexpected successes will go into directory '2012-04-16-11_34_08'
Command invoked: python ./dotest.py -A x86_64 -v -c ../examples/test/.lldb-pre-post-flight functionalities/watchpoint/hello_watchpoint
compilers=['clang']
Configuration: arch=x86_64 compiler=clang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Collected 2 tests
1: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dsym_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit. ...
Running pre-flight function:
for test case: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dsym_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Running post-flight function:
for test case: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dsym_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
ok
2: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dwarf_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Test a simple sequence of watchpoint creation and watchpoint hit. ...
Running pre-flight function:
for test case: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dwarf_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
Running post-flight function:
for test case: test_hello_watchpoint_with_dwarf_using_watchpoint_set (TestMyFirstWatchpoint.HelloWatchpointTestCase)
ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 2 tests in 1.584s
OK
llvm-svn: 154847
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
1. CHECKNEXT was used instead of CHECK-NEXT which caused the line to be
ignored which in turn hid the next 2 problems:
2. ('sh_offset', 0x{{{[0-9,a-f]+}}) had one too many leading curly braces and
failed to do it's job of accepting all hex digits and:
3. The check for the hex values for the code instructions didn't account for
blank separators.
Patch by Jack Carter.
llvm-svn: 154842
through the use of 'fpmath' metadata. Currently this only provides a 'fpaccuracy'
value, which may be a number in ULPs or the keyword 'fast', however the intent is
that this will be extended with additional information about NaN's, infinities
etc later. No optimizations have been hooked up to this so far.
llvm-svn: 154822
This is mostly to test the waters. I'd like to get results from FNT
build bots and other bots running on non-x86 platforms.
This feature has been pretty heavily tested over the last few months by
me, and it fixes several of the execution time regressions caused by the
inlining work by preventing inlining decisions from radically impacting
block layout.
I've seen very large improvements in yacr2 and ackermann benchmarks,
along with the expected noise across all of the benchmark suite whenever
code layout changes. I've analyzed all of the regressions and fixed
them, or found them to be impossible to fix. See my email to llvmdev for
more details.
I'd like for this to be in 3.1 as it complements the inliner changes,
but if any failures are showing up or anyone has concerns, it is just
a flag flip and so can be easily turned off.
I'm switching it on tonight to try and get at least one run through
various folks' performance suites in case SPEC or something else has
serious issues with it. I'll watch bots and revert if anything shows up.
llvm-svn: 154816
once we start changing the block layout, so just nuke it. If anyone has
ideas about how to craft a code layout agnostic form of the test please
let me know.
llvm-svn: 154815
Chandler Carruth