Instead of returning early on `handleChangedOperand()` recursion
(finally identified (and test added) in r225657), prevent it upfront by
releasing operands before RAUW.
Aside from massively different program flow, there should be no
functionality change ;).
llvm-svn: 225665
There are some operands which can take either immediates or registers
and we were previously using different register class to distinguish
between operands that could take immediates and those that could not.
This patch switches to using RegisterOperands which should simplify the
backend by reducing the number of register classes and also make it
easier to implement the assembler.
llvm-svn: 225662
This adds two new fields to the RegisterOperand TableGen class:
string OperandNamespace = "MCOI";
string OperandType = "OPERAND_REGISTER";
These fields can be used to specify a target specific operand type,
which will be stored in the OperandType member of the MCOperandInfo
object.
This can be useful for targets that need to store some extra information
about operands that cannot be expressed using the target independent
types. For example, in the R600 backend, there are operands which
can take either registers or immediates and it is convenient to be able
to specify this in the TableGen definitions.
llvm-svn: 225661
This just tweaks the fix from r224892 (which handled PCHs) to work with
modules, where we will serialize each method individually and hence the
hasMoreThanOneDecl bit needs to be updated as we add the methods.
llvm-svn: 225659
This is a fixed version of reverted r225500. It fixes the too early
if() continue; of the last patch and adds a comment to the unorthodox
loop.
llvm-svn: 225652
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can
be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L
symbol in the symbol table or not.
The other is that ld64 requires the relocations to cstring to use linker
visible symbols on AArch64.
Thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for testing this!
Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like
bar:
.long L0 + 1
the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.
In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.
The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.
In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.
This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.
This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.
llvm-svn: 225644
This will call `handleChangedOperand()` less frequently, but in that
case (i.e., `isStoredDistinctInContext()`) it has identical logic to
here.
llvm-svn: 225643
Put them in a separate function, so we can reuse them to further
simplify fortified libcalls as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6540
llvm-svn: 225639
The checks are the same for fortified counterparts to the libcalls, so
we might as well do them in a single place.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6539
llvm-svn: 225638
pc_fd was not initialized to (-1) on some code paths, resulting in the program
erroneously closing stdin when reinitializing coverage.
llvm-svn: 225637
Specifically, adjust the leading "__asm {" and trailing "}" while still
leaving the assembly inside it alone.
This fixes llvm.org/PR22190.
llvm-svn: 225623
Similar to r225619, use a special EOF token to mark the end of the
exception specification instead of cxx_exceptspec_end. Use the current
scope as the marker.
llvm-svn: 225622
I added setEofData/getEofData to solve this sort of problem back in
r224505. Use the Param's decl to tell us if this is *our* EOF token.
llvm-svn: 225619
This script is currently specific to x86 and limited to use with very
small regression or feature tests using 'llc' and 'FileCheck' in
a reasonably canonical way. It is in no way general purpose or robust at
this point. However, it works quite well for simple examples. Here is
the intended workflow:
- Make a change that requires updating N test files and M functions'
assertions within those files.
- Stash the change.
- Update those N test files' RUN-lines to look "canonical"[1].
- Refresh the FileCheck lines for either the entire file or select
functions by running this script.
- The script will parse the RUN lines and run the 'llc' binary you
give it according to each line, collecting the asm.
- It will then annotate each function with the appropriate FileCheck
comments to check every instruction from the start of the first
basic block to the last return.
- There will be numerous cases where the script either fails to remove
the old lines, or inserts checks which need to be manually editted,
but the manual edits tend to be deletions or replacements of
registers with FileCheck variables which are fast manual edits.
- A common pattern is to have the script insert complete checking of
every instruction, and then edit it down to only check the relevant
ones.
- Be careful to do all of these cleanups though! The script is
designed to make transferring and formatting the asm output of llc
into a test case fast, it is *not* designed to be authoratitive
about what constitutes a good test!
- Commit the nice fresh baseline of checks.
- Unstash your change and rebuild llc.
- Re-run script to regenerate the FileCheck annotations
- Remember to re-cleanup these annotations!!!
- Check the diff to make sure this is sane, checking the things you
expected it to, and check that the newly updated tests actually pass.
- Profit!
Also, I'm *terrible* at writing Python, and frankly I didn't spend a lot
of time making this script beautiful or well engineered. But it's useful
to me and may be useful to others so I thought I'd send it out.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5546
llvm-svn: 225618
Looking at r225438 inspired me to see how the PowerPC backend handled the
situation (calling a bitcasted TLS global), and it turns out we also produced
an error (cannot select ...). What it means to "call" something that is not a
function is implementation and platform specific, but in the name of doing
something (besides crashing), this makes sure we do what GCC does (treat all
such calls as calls through a function pointer -- meaning that the pointer is
assumed, as is the convention on PPC, to point to a function descriptor
structure holding the actual code address along with the function's TOC pointer
and environment pointer). As GCC does, we now do the same for calling regular
(non-TLS) non-function globals too.
I'm not sure whether this is the most useful way to define the behavior, but at
least we won't be alone.
llvm-svn: 225617
It is not correct to let it consume the cxx_defaultarg_end token. I'm
starting to wonder if it makes more sense to stop SkipUntil from
consuming such tokens.
llvm-svn: 225615
The rewrite map files are not copied, and so cannot be tracked as temporary
files. Add them explicitly to the list of files that we request from the user
to be attached to bug reports.
llvm-svn: 225614
Recovery from malformed lambda introducers would find us consuming the
synthetic default argument token, which is bad. Instead, stop right
before that token.
llvm-svn: 225613
D6015 / rL221313 enabled commutation for SSE immediate blend instructions, but due to a typo the AVX2 VPBLENDW ymm instructions weren't flagged as commutative along with the others in the tables, but were still being commuted in code and tested for.
llvm-svn: 225612
Ben Langmuir