to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The DLL thunks are stubs added to an instrumented DLL to redirect ASAN API calls
to the real ones in the main executable. These thunks must contain dummy
code before __asan_init got called. Unfortunately, MSVC linker is doing ICF and is
merging functions with the same body.
In our case, this two ASAN thunks were incorrectly merged:
```
asan_interface.inc:16
INTERFACE_FUNCTION(__asan_before_dynamic_init)
```
```
sanitizer_common_interface.inc:16
INTERFACE_FUNCTION(__sanitizer_verify_contiguous_container)
```
The same thunk got patched twice. After the second patching, calls to
`__asan_before_dynamic_init` are redirected to `__sanitizer_verify_contiguous_container`
and trigger a DCHECK on incorrect operands/
The problem was caused by the macro that is only using __LINE__ to prevent
collapsing code.
```
#define INTERCEPT_SANITIZER_FUNCTION(name)
extern "C" __declspec(noinline) void name() {
volatile int prevent_icf = (__LINE__ << 8); (void)prevent_icf;
```
The current patch is adding __COUNTER__ which is safer than __LINE__.
Also, to precent ICF (guarantee that code is different), we are using a unique attribute:
- the name of the function
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek, chrisha, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30219
llvm-svn: 295761
In this diff, I update current implementation of the interception in dll_thunks
to consider the special case of weak functions.
First we check if the client has redefined the function in the main executable
(for example: __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard). It we can't find it, then we look
for the default implementation (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard__dll). The
default implementation is always available because the static runtime is linked
to the main executable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29155
llvm-svn: 293952
When the sanitizer is implemented as a static library and is included in the
main executable, we need an auxiliary static library dll_thunk that will be
linked to the dlls that have instrumentation, so they can refer to the runtime
in the main executable. Basically, it uses interception to get a pointer the
function in the main executable and override its function with that pointer.
Before this diff, all of the implementation for dll_thunks was included in asan.
In this diff I split it into different sanitizers, so we can use other
sanitizers regardless of whether we include asan or not.
All the sanitizers include a file sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc that register
functions to be intercepted in the binary section: DLLTH
When the dll including dll_thunk is initialized, it will execute
__dll_thunk_init() implemented in: sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc,
which will consider all the CB registered in the section DLLTH. So, all the
functions registered will be intercepted, and redirected to the implementation
in the main executable.
All the files "sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc" are independent, so we don't need to
include a specific list of sanitizers. Now, we compile: asan_win_dll_thunk.cc
ubsan_win_dll_thunk.cc, sanitizer_coverage_win_dll_thunk.cc and
sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc, to generate asan_dll_thunk, because we include asan,
ubsan and sanitizer coverage in the address sanitizer library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29154
llvm-svn: 293951
Chandler Carruth