State numbers are calculated by performing a walk from the innermost
funclet to the outermost funclet. Rudimentary support for the new EH
constructs has been added to the assembly printer, just enough to test
the new machinery.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12098
llvm-svn: 245331
Summary: This is the correct way to handle JAL instructions when PIC is enabled.
Patch by Toma Tabacu
Reviewers: seanbruno, tomatabacu
Subscribers: brooks, seanbruno, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6231
llvm-svn: 245305
Summary:
This information is needed to decide whether we do the PIC-only JAL expansions or not. It's also needed for an upcoming patch which implements the .cprestore assembler directive (which can only be used effectively in PIC mode).
By making this information available to the MipsAsmParser, we will know when to insert the instructions mandated by the .cprestore assembler directive and we will be able to give some useful warnings when we encounter a potential misuse of this directive.
Patch by Toma Tabacu
Reviewers: dsanders, seanbruno
Subscribers: brooks, seanbruno, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5626
llvm-svn: 245291
Summary:
Increase the estimated costs for insert/extract element operations on
AArch64. This is motivated by results from benchmarking interleaved
accesses.
Add missing costs for zext/sext/trunc instructions and some integer to
floating point conversions. These costs were previously calculated
by scalarizing these operation and were affected by the cost increase of
the insert/extract element operations.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: mcrosier, aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11939
llvm-svn: 245226
Summary:
This change limits the minimum cost of an insert/extract
element operation to 2 in cases where this would result
in mixing of NEON and VFP code.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12030
llvm-svn: 245225
Summary: It is the same as LA, except that it can also load 64-bit addresses and it only works on 64-bit MIPS architectures.
Reviewers: tomatabacu, seanbruno, vkalintiris
Subscribers: brooks, seanbruno, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9524
llvm-svn: 245208
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.
I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.
But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.
To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.
To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.
With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063
llvm-svn: 245193
We can set additional bits in a mask given that we know the other
operand of an AND already has some bits set to zero. This can be more
efficient if doing so allows us to use an instruction which implicitly
sign extends the immediate.
This fixes PR24085.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11289
llvm-svn: 245169
For cases where we TRUNCATE and then ZERO_EXTEND to a larger size (often from vector legalization), see if we can mask the source data and then ZERO_EXTEND (instead of after a ANY_EXTEND). This can help avoid having to generate a larger mask, and possibly applying it to several sub-vectors.
(zext (truncate x)) -> (zext (and(x, m))
Includes a minor patch to SystemZ to better recognise 8/16-bit zero extension patterns from RISBG bit-extraction code.
This is the first of a number of minor patches to help improve the conversion of byte masks to clear mask shuffles.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11764
llvm-svn: 245160
When trying to fix SGPR live ranges, skip defs that are
killed in the same block as the def. I don't think
we need to worry about these cases as long as the
live ranges of the SGPRs in dominating blocks are
correct.
This reduces the number of elements the second
loop over the function needs to look at, and makes
it generally easier to understand. The second loop
also only considers if the live range is live
in to a block, which logically means it
must have been live out from another.
llvm-svn: 245150
function.
This was the same as getFrameIndexReference, but without the FrameReg
output.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12042
llvm-svn: 245148
This is just an initial checkin of an implementation of the Relooper algorithm, in preparation for WebAssembly codegen to utilize. It doesn't do anything yet by itself.
The Relooper algorithm takes an arbitrary control flow graph and generates structured control flow from that, utilizing a helper variable when necessary to handle irreducibility. The WebAssembly backend will be able to use this in order to generate an AST for its binary format.
Author: azakai
Reviewers: jfb, sunfish
Subscribers: jevinskie, arsenm, jroelofs, llvm-commits
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11691
llvm-svn: 245142
True branch instructions do behave as expected with liveness.
Avoid the phrasing "branch decision is based on a value in an SGPR"
because this could be misleading. A VALU compare instruction's
result is still based on an SGPR, even though that condition
may be divergent.
llvm-svn: 245131
Although targeting CoreCLR is similar to targeting MSVC, there are
certain important differences that the backend must be aware of
(e.g. differences in stack probes, EH, and library calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11012
llvm-svn: 245115
We canonicalize V64 vectors to V128 through insert_subvector: the other
FMLA/FMLS/FMUL/FMULX patterns match that already, but this one doesn't,
so we'd fail to match fmls and generate fneg+fmla instead.
The vector equivalents are already tested and functional.
llvm-svn: 245107
This patch makes the Darwin ARM backend take advantage of TargetParser. It
also teaches TargetParser about ARMV7K for the first time. This makes target
triple parsing more consistent across llvm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11996
llvm-svn: 245081
This patch fixes the x86 implementation of allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess() to correctly
return the 'Fast' output parameter for 32-byte accesses. To test that, an existing load
merging optimization is changed to use the TLI hook. This exposes a shortcoming in the
current logic and results in the regression test update. Changing other direct users of
the isUnalignedMem32Slow() x86 CPU attribute would be a follow-on patch.
Without the fix in allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses(), we will infinite loop when targeting
SandyBridge because LowerINSERT_SUBVECTOR() creates 32-byte loads from two 16-byte loads
while PerformLOADCombine() splits them back into 16-byte loads.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662
llvm-svn: 245075
This reverts commit r245047.
It was failing on the darwin bots. The problem was that when running
./bin/llc -march=msp430
llc gets to
if (TheTriple.getTriple().empty())
TheTriple.setTriple(sys::getDefaultTargetTriple());
Which means that we go with an arch of msp430 but a triple of
x86_64-apple-darwin14.4.0 which fails badly.
That code has to be updated to select a triple based on the value of
march, but that is not a trivial fix.
llvm-svn: 245062
Other than some places that were handling unknown as ELF, this should
have no change. The test updates are because we were detecting
arm-coff or x86_64-win64-coff as ELF targets before.
It is not clear if the enum should live on the Triple. At least now it lives
in a single location and should be easier to move somewhere else.
llvm-svn: 245047
Spotted by Ahmed - in r244594 I inadvertently marked f16 min/max as legal.
I've reverted it here, and marked min/max on scalar f16's as promote. I've also added a testcase. The test just checks that the compiler doesn't fall over - it doesn't create fmin nodes for f16 yet.
llvm-svn: 245035
This introduces the basic functionality to support "token types".
The motivation stems from the need to perform operations on a Value
whose provenance cannot be obscured.
There are several applications for such a type but my immediate
motivation stems from WinEH. Our personality routine enforces a
single-entry - single-exit regime for cleanups. After several rounds of
optimizations, we may be left with a terminator whose "cleanup-entry
block" is not entirely clear because control flow has merged two
cleanups together. We have experimented with using labels as operands
inside of instructions which are not terminators to indicate where we
came from but found that LLVM does not expect such exotic uses of
BasicBlocks.
Instead, we can use this new type to clearly associate the "entry point"
and "exit point" of our cleanup. This is done by having the cleanuppad
yield a Token and consuming it at the cleanupret.
The token type makes it impossible to obscure or otherwise hide the
Value, making it trivial to track the relationship between the two
points.
What is the burden to the optimizer? Well, it turns out we have already
paid down this cost by accepting that there are certain calls that we
are not permitted to duplicate, optimizations have to watch out for
such instructions anyway. There are additional places in the optimizer
that we will probably have to update but early examination has given me
the impression that this will not be heroic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11861
llvm-svn: 245029
We used to just say "invalid type suffix for instruction", which is
misleading. This is because we fallback to the long-form matcher if the
short-form matcher failed, losing the error information on the way.
Save it, so that we can provide a little better diagnostics when the
long-form matcher thinks a suffix is the cause of the error.
llvm-svn: 244955
Follow up to D10947 - D9746 added general SMAX/SMIN/UMAX/UMIN pattern matching to SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect.
This patch removes the X86 implementation and improves the AVX1/AVX2 support to correctly lower 256-bit integer vectors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12006
llvm-svn: 244949
After r244870 flush() will only compare two null pointers and return,
doing nothing but wasting run time. The call is not required any more
as the stream and its SmallString are always in sync.
Thanks to David Blaikie for reviewing.
llvm-svn: 244928
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11471
It improves the code generated for converting a scalar to a vector value. With
direct moves from GPRs to VSRs, we no longer require expensive stack operations
for this. Subsequent patches will handle the reverse case and more general
operations between vectors and their scalar elements.
llvm-svn: 244921
This was my error. We've got f32 marked as legal because they're simulated using a v2f32 instruction, but there's no equivalent for f64.
This will get test coverage imminently when D12015 lands.
llvm-svn: 244916
David Majnemer