Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Justin Bogner 6c452834a1 MIR: Print the register class or bank in vreg defs
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,

  %1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

would now be written as

  %1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)

While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.

Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.

llvm-svn: 316479
2017-10-24 18:04:54 +00:00
Justin Bogner 876ad287d1 GISel: Canonicalize select tests using update_mir_test_checks
This runs `udpate_mir_test_checks --add-vreg-checks` on the tests taht
are already more or less in the format that generates, so that there
will be less churn in some upcoming changes.

llvm-svn: 316139
2017-10-18 23:33:31 +00:00
Igor Breger 0f382ccb68 [GlobalISel][X86] Use correct physical register in mir tests.NFC.
llvm-svn: 313479
2017-09-17 08:30:42 +00:00
Igor Breger b186a69aa5 [GlobalISel][X86] Support vector type G_UNMERGE_VALUES selection.
Summary:
Support vector type G_UNMERGE_VALUES selection.
For now G_UNMERGE_VALUES marked as legal for any type, so nothing to do in legalizer.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, zvi, guyblank

Reviewed By: guyblank

Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, guyblank, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33665

llvm-svn: 306971
2017-07-02 08:15:49 +00:00