This enables unifying command line flags with config options in clangd
internals. This patch changes behaviour in 2 places:
- BackgroundIndex was previously disabled when -remote-index was
provided. After this patch, it will be enabled but all files will have
bkgindex policy set to Skip.
- -index-file was loaded at startup (at least load was initiated), now
the load will happen through ProjectAwareIndex with first index query.
Unfortunately this doesn't simplify any options initially, as
- CompileCommandsDir is also used by clangd --check workflow, which
doesn't use configs.
- EnableBackgroundIndex option controls whether the component will be
created at all, which implies creation of extra threads registering a
listener for compilation database discoveries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98029
Create a `ThreadsafeFS` in the `DraftStore` that overlays the dirty file contents over another `ThreadsafeFS`.
This provides a nice thread-safe interface for using dirty file contents throughout the codebase, for example cross file refactoring.
Creating a Filesystem view will overlay a snapshot of the current contents, so if the draft store is updated while the view is being used, it will contain stale contents.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94554
As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer
to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former).
FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive.
I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture
the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to
"components" but exclude CDB for example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
Clangd can invalidate client state of features like semantic higlighting
without client explicitly triggering, for example after a preamble build
caused by an onSave notification on a different file.
This patch introduces a mechanism to let client know of such actions,
and also calls the workspace/semanticTokens/refresh request to
demonstrate the situation after each preamble build.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/699.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97548
ClangdServer already gets notified of every change, so it makes sense for it to
be the source of truth.
This is a step towards having ClangdServer expose a FS that includes dirty
buffers: D94554
Related changes:
- version is now optional for ClangdServer, to preserve our existing fuzziness
in this area (missing version ==> autoincrement)
- ClangdServer::format{File,Range} are now more regular ClangdServer functions
that don't need the code passed in. While here, combine into one function.
- incremental content update logic is moved from DraftStore to
ClangdLSPServer, with most of the implementation in SourceCode.cpp.
DraftStore is now fairly trivial, and will probably ultimately be
*replaced* by the dirty FS stuff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97738
The redundancy around work-done-progress is annoying but ok for now.
There's a weirdness with context lifetimes around outgoing method calls, which
I've preserved to keep this NFC. We should probably fix it though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96717
This is NFC because the MessageHandler refused to dispatch to them until the
server is initialized anyway.
This is a more natural time to bind them - it's when they become callable, and
it's when client capabalities are available and server ones can be set.
One module-lifecycle function will be responsible for all three.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96608
The goal is to allow the LSP bindings of features to be defined outside
the ClangdLSPServer class, turning it into less of a monolith.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96544
This is obsoleted by the standard semanticTokens request family.
As well as the protocol details, this allows us to remove a bunch of plumbing
around pushing highlights to clients.
This should not land until the new protocol has feature parity, see D77702.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95576
- Infrastructure to support modifiers (protocol etc)
- standard modifiers:
- declaration (but no definition, yet)
- deprecated
- readonly (based on a fairly fuzzy const checking)
- static (for class members and locals, but *not* file-scope things!)
- abstract (for C++ classes, and pure-virtual methods)
- nonstandard modifier:
- deduced (on "auto" whose Kind is Class etc)
Happy to drop this if it's controversial at all.
- While here, update sample tweak to use our internal names, in
anticipation of theia TM scopes going away.
This addresses some of the goals of D77702, but leaves some things undone.
Mostly because I think these will want some discussion.
- no split between dependent type/name.
(We may want to model this as a modifier, type+dependent vs ???+dependent)
- no split between primitive/typedef.
(Is introducing a nonstandard kind is worth this distinction?)
- no nonstandard local attribute
This probably makes sense, I'm wondering if we want others and how
they fit together.
There's one minor regression in explicit template specialization declarations
due to a latent bug in findExplicitReferences, but fixing it after seems OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77811
Unfortunately this treats overrides declarations as declarations, not as
references. I don't plan to land this until I have a fix for that issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95450
This reverts commit 9d9ceb3745.
First time round caused some build bot failures due to older compilers not patched with the Defect Report about full specialization being allowed at class scope.
Add bind methods handling the case when a method has an empty params interface and when it has no parameters.
Remove ShutdownParams and ExitParams from Protocol, In LSP they aren't defined, instead the methods are defined to have void as the params. This signature now better reflects that.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95270
This is a step towards allowing CDB behavior to being configurable.
Previously ClangdServer itself created the configs and installed them into
contexts. This was natural as it knows how to deal with resulting diagnostics.
However this prevents config being used in CDB, which must be created before
ClangdServer. So we extract the context provider (config loader) as a separate
object, which publishes diagnostics to a ClangdServer::Callbacks itself.
Now initialization looks like:
- First create the config::Provider
- Then create the ClangdLSPServer, passing config provider
- Next, create the context provider, passing config provider + diagnostic callbacks
- now create the CDB, passing context provider
- finally create ClangdServer, passing CDB, context provider, and diagnostic callbacks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95087
Currently some clients watch for CDB changes and restart clangd, now that we
can reload compile_commands.json ourselves this is counterproductive.
The capability allows this behavior to be phased out.
This is going to be a mild regression, as we do not actually watch for files on
disk and so new diagnostics need to wait until a rebuild is requested e.g. due
to file change (and the internal caches have expired).
However this is still a better tradeoff (and if it's important, we can request
the client to watch files for us in the future).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94222
Instead of always locking/unlocking a contended mutex, we now do one atomic read
in the common case, and one read + one exchange if the timer has expried.
Also use this for memory profiling which has similar/compatible requirements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93726
This diff addresses the issue of the ever increasing memory usage of clangd. The key to understand what happens is to use `malloc_stats()`: malloc arenas keep getting bigger, although the actual memory used does not. It seems some operations while bulding the indices (both dynamic and background) create this problem. Specifically, 'FileSymbols::update' and 'FileSymbols::buildIndex' seem especially affected.
This diff adds a call to `malloc_trim()` periodically in
ClangdLSPServer.
Fixes: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/251
Fixes: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/115
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93452
When querying the CDB, we stat the underlying file to check it hasn't changed.
We don't do this every time, but only if we didn't check within 5 seconds.
This behavior only exists for compile_commands.json and compile_flags.txt.
The CDB plugin system doesn't expose enough information to handle others.
Slight behavior change: we now only look for `build/compile_commands.json`
rather than trying every CDB strategy under `build` subdirectories.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92663
This is a mass-market version of the "dump AST" tweak we have behind
-hidden-features.
I think in this friendlier form it'll be useful for people outside clang
developers, which would justify making it a real feature.
It could be useful as a step towards lightweight clang-AST tooling in clangd
itself (like matcher-based search).
Advantages over the tweak:
- simplified information makes it more accessible, likely somewhat useful
without learning too much clang internals
- can be shown in a tree view
- structured information gives some options for presentation (e.g.
icon + two text colors + tooltip in vscode)
- clickable nodes jump to the corresponding code
Disadvantages:
- a bunch of code to handle different node types
- likely missing some important info vs dump-ast due to brevity/oversight
- may end up chasing/maintaining support for the long tail of nodes
Demo with VSCode support: https://imgur.com/a/6gKfyIV
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89571
Performs a detailed profiling of clangd lsp server and conveys the
result to the client as a json object. It is of the form:
{
"_self": 0,
"_total": 8,
"child1": {
"_self": 4,
"_total": 4,
}
"child2": {
"_self": 2,
"_total": 4,
"child_deep": {
"_self": 2,
"_total": 2,
}
}
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89277
If the NewName is provided, prepareRename would perform a name
validation.
The motivation is to allow our internal embeder implement the customized
"canRenameInto" functionality on top of prepareRename.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88881
several changes:
- return a structure result in rename API;
- prepareRename now returns more information (main-file occurrences);
- remove the duplicated detecting-touch-identifier code in prepareRename (which is implemented in rename API);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88634
Intent was a nice idea but it ends up being a bit awkward/heavyweight
without adding much.
In particular, it makes it hard to implement `CodeActionParams.only` properly
(there's an inheritance hierarchy for kinds).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88427
In preparation for making moving TweakFilter from ClangdServer::Options to
a ClangdLSPServer option, and letting it vary per-request.
(In order to implement CodeActionParams.only)
Also a general overdue cleanup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88470
Translating between JSON objects and C++ strutctures is common.
From experience in clangd, fromJSON/ObjectMapper work well and save a lot of
code, but aren't adopted elsewhere at least partly due to total lack of error
reporting beyond "ok"/"bad".
The recently-added error model should be rich enough for most applications.
It requires tracking the path within the root object and reporting local
errors at appropriate places.
To do this, we exploit the fact that the call graph of recursive
parse functions mirror the structure of the JSON itself.
The current path is represented as a linked list of segments, each of which is
on the stack as a parameter. Concretely, fromJSON now looks like:
bool fromJSON(const Value&, T&, Path);
Beyond the signature change, this is reasonably unobtrusive: building
the path segments is mostly handled by ObjectMapper and the vector<T> fromJSON.
However the root caller of fromJSON must now create a Root object to
store the errors, which is a little clunky.
I've added high-level parse<T>(StringRef) -> Expected<T>, but it's not
general enough to be the primary interface I think (at least, not usable in
clangd).
All existing users (mostly just clangd) are updated in this patch,
making this change backwards-compatible is a bit hairy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88103
Summary:
This is considerably terser than the makeStringError and friends, and
avoids verbosity cliffs that discourage adding log information.
It follows the syntax used in log/elog/vlog/dlog that have been successful.
The main caveats are:
- it's strictly out-of-place in logger.h, though kind of fits thematically and
in implementation
- it claims the "error" identifier, which seems a bit too opinionated
to put higher up in llvm
I've updated some users of StringError mostly at random - there are lots
more mechanical changes but I'd like to get this reviewed before making
them all.
Reviewers: kbobyrev, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83419
Summary:
This patch introduces basic textDocument/foldingRange support. It relies on
textDocument/documentSymbols to collect all symbols and uses takes ranges
to create folds.
The next steps for textDocument/foldingRange support would be:
* Implementing FoldingRangeClientCapabilities and respecting respect client
preferences
* Specifying folding range kind
* Migrating from DocumentSymbol implementation to custom RecursiveASTVisitor flow that will allow more flexibility
* Supporting more folding range types: comments, PP conditional regions, includes and other code regions (e.g. public/private/protected sections of classes, control flow statement bodies)
Tested: (Neo)Vim (coc-clangd) and VSCode.
Related issue: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/310
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: nridge, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436
Summary:
They don't need ASTs or anything, so they should still run immediately.
These were sync for historical reasons (they predate clangd having a pervasive
threading model). This worked ok as they were "cheap".
Aside for consistency, there are a couple of reasons to make them async:
- they do IO (finding .clang-format) so aren't trivially cheap
- having TUScheduler involved in running these tasks means we can use it as
an injection point for configuration.
(TUScheduler::run will need to learn about which file is being operated on,
but that's an easy change).
- adding the config system adds more potential IO, too
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82642
Sam McCall