If there is no SHF_TLS section, there will be no PT_TLS and Out::tlsPhdr may be a nullptr.
If the symbol referenced by an R_TLS is lazy, we should treat the symbol as undefined.
Also reorganize tls-in-archive.s and tls-weak-undef.s . They do not test what they intended to test.
For R_TLS:
1) Delete Sym.isTls() . The assembler ensures the symbol is STT_TLS.
If not (the input is broken), we would crash (dereferencing null Out::TlsPhdr).
2) Change Sym.isUndefWeak() to Sym.isUndefined(), otherwise with --noinhibit-exec
we would still evaluate the symbol and crash.
3) Return A if the symbol is undefined. This is PR40570.
The case is probably unrealistic but returning A matches R_ABS and the
behavior of several dynamic loaders.
R_NEG_TLS is obsoleted Sun TLS we don't fully support, but
R_RELAX_TLS_GD_TO_LE_NEG is still used by GD->LE relaxation (subl $var@tpoff,%eax).
They should add the addend. Unfortunately I can't test it as compilers don't seem to generate non-zero implicit addends.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62098
llvm-svn: 361146
Fangrui Song