Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
This should be correctly implied by the linker.
This also makes the tests slightly easier to maintain and compare
with the equivalent tests under for other platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47513
llvm-svn: 333567
This fixes bootstrap of llvm-tblgen (with LTO) and PR27150.
Slightly longer explanation follows.
Emission of .init_array instead of .ctors is supported only on a
subset of the Target LLVM supports. Codegen needs to be conservative
and always emit .ctors unless instructed otherwise (based on target).
If the dynamic linker sees .init_array it completely ignores
what's inside .ctors and therefore some constructors are not called
(and this causes llvm-tblgen to crash on startup).
Teach LLD/LTO about the Codegen options so we end up always emitting
.init_array and avoid this issue.
In future, we might end up supporting mix of .ctors and .init_array
in different input files if this shows up as a real-world use case.
The way gold handles this case is mapping .ctors from input into
.init_array in output. There's also another caveat because
as far as I understand .ctors run in reverse order so when we do
the copy/mapping we need to reverse copy in the output if there's
more than one ctor. That's why I'd rather avoid this complicate logic
unless there's a real need.
An analogous reasoning holds for .dtors/.fini_array.
llvm-svn: 265085
Summary:
More generally, appending linkage is a special case that we don't want
to create a SymbolBody for.
Reviewers: rafael, ruiu
Subscribers: Bigcheese, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18012
llvm-svn: 263179
Amy Huang