It is possible that dependent instruction may access memory.
In this case we must reject optimization because the memory change will
be visible in null handler basic block. So we will execute an instruction which
we must not execute if check fails.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36392
llvm-svn: 310443
Right now areMemoryOpsAliased has an assertion justified as:
MMO1 should have a value due it comes from operation we'd like to use
as implicit null check.
assert(MMO1->getValue() && "MMO1 should have a Value!");
However, it is possible for that invariant to not be upheld in the
following situation (conceptually):
Null check %RAX
NotNullSucc:
%RAX = LEA %RSP, 16 // I0
%RDX = MOV64rm %RAX // I1
With the current code, we will have an early exit from
ImplicitNullChecks::isSuitableMemoryOp on I0 with SR_Unsuitable.
However, I1 will look plausible (since it loads from %RAX) and
will go ahead and call areMemoryOpsAliased(I1, I0). This will cause
us to fail the assert mentioned above since I1 does not load from an
IR level value and thus is allowed to have a non-Value base address.
The fix is to bail out earlier whenever we see an unsuitable
instruction overwrite PointerReg. This would guarantee that when we
call areMemoryOpsAliased, we're guaranteed to be looking at an
instruction that loads from or stores to an IR level value.
Original Patch Author: sanjoy
Reviewers: sanjoy, mkazantsev, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34385
llvm-svn: 305879
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Rename the DEBUG_TYPE to match the names of corresponding passes where
it makes sense. Also establish the pattern of simply referencing
DEBUG_TYPE instead of repeating the passname where possible.
llvm-svn: 303921
Summary:
With this change ImplicitNullCheck optimization uses alias analysis
and can use load/store memory access for implicit null check if there
are other load/store before but memory accesses do not alias.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30331
llvm-svn: 296440
Summary:
This change allows usage of store instruction for implicit null check.
Memory Aliasing Analisys is not used and change conservatively supposes
that any store and load may access the same memory. As a result
re-ordering of store-store, store-load and load-store is prohibited.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29400
llvm-svn: 294338
Summary:
This change allows a re-order of two intructions if their uses
are overlapped.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29120
llvm-svn: 293775
Summary:
isSuitableMemoryOp method is repsonsible for verification
that instruction is a candidate to use in implicit null check.
Additionally it checks that base register is not re-defined before.
In case base has been re-defined it just returns false and lookup
is continued while any suitable instruction will not succeed this check
as well. This results in redundant further operations.
So when we found that base register has been re-defined we just
stop.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29119
llvm-svn: 293736
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
Summary:
This change rewrites a core component in the ImplicitNullChecks pass for
greater simplicity since the original design was over-complicated for no
good reason. Please review this as essentially a new pass. The change
is almost NFC and I've added a test case for a scenario that this new
code handles that wasn't handled earlier.
The implicit null check pass, at its core, is a code hoisting transform.
It differs from "normal" code transforms in that it speculates
potentially faulting instructions (by design), but a lot of the usual
hazard detection logic (register read-after-write etc.) still applies.
We previously detected hazards by keeping track of registers defined and
used by machine instructions over an instruction range, but that was
unwieldy and did not actually confer any performance benefits. The
intent was to have linear time complexity over the number of machine
instructions considered, but it ended up being N^2 is practice.
This new version is more obviously O(N^2) (with N capped to 8 by
default) in hazard detection. It does not attempt to be clever in
tracking register uses or defs (the previous cleverness here was a
source of bugs).
Once this is checked in, I'll extract out the `IsSuitableMemoryOp` and
`CanHoistLoadInst` lambda into member functions (they're too complicated
to be inline lambdas) and do some other related NFC cleanups.
Reviewers: reames, anna, atrick
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27592
llvm-svn: 290394
ImplicitNullCheck keeps track of one instruction that the memory
operation depends on that it also hoists with the memory operation.
When hoisting this dependency, it would sometimes clobber a live-in
value to the basic block we were hoisting the two things out of. Fix
this by explicitly looking for such dependencies.
I also noticed two redundant checks on `MO.isDef()` in IsMIOperandSafe.
They're redundant since register MachineOperands are either Defs or Uses
-- there is no third kind. I'll change the checks to asserts in a later
commit.
llvm-svn: 287213
We don't track callee clobbered registers correctly, so avoid hoisting
across calls.
Note: for this bug to trigger we need a `readonly` call target, since we
already have logic to not hoist across potentially storing instructions
either.
llvm-svn: 287159
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
This is mostly a mechanical change to make TargetInstrInfo API take
MachineInstr& (instead of MachineInstr* or MachineBasicBlock::iterator)
when the argument is expected to be a valid MachineInstr. This is a
general API improvement.
Although it would be possible to do this one function at a time, that
would demand a quadratic amount of churn since many of these functions
call each other. Instead I've done everything as a block and just
updated what was necessary.
This is mostly mechanical fixes: adding and removing `*` and `&`
operators. The only non-mechanical change is to split
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatencyImpl out from
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency. Previously, the latter took a
`MachineInstr*` which it updated to the instruction bundle leader; now,
the latter calls the former either with the same `MachineInstr&` or the
bundle leader.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
Note: I updated WebAssembly, Lanai, and AVR (despite being
off-by-default) since it turned out to be easy. I couldn't run tests
for AVR since llc doesn't link with it turned on.
llvm-svn: 274189
When trying to convert a loading instruction into a FAULTING_LOAD, we
sometimes face code like this:
if %R10 is not null:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10)
else:
goto TRAP
In these cases we would like to use the AND32rm instruction as the
faulting operation by hoisting the "depedency" def-ing %R9 also above
the control flow, transforming the program into:
%R9<def> = MOV32ri Immediate
%R9<def, tied> = FAULTING_LOAD_OP(AND32rm %R9, 0x20(%R10), FailPath: TRAP)
This change teaches ImplicitNullChecks to do the above, when safe.
llvm-svn: 273501
The replaced load may have implicit-defs and those defs may be used
in the block of the original load. Make sure to update the liveness
accordingly.
This is a generalization of r267817.
llvm-svn: 268412
This operation may branch to the handler block and we do not want it
to happen anywhere within the basic block.
Moreover, by marking it "terminator and branch" the machine verifier
does not wrongly assume (because of AnalyzeBranch not knowing better)
the branch is analyzable. Indeed, the target was seeing only the
unconditional branch and not the faulting load op and thought it was
a simple unconditional block.
The machine verifier was complaining because of that and moreover,
other optimizations could have done wrong transformation!
In the process, simplify the representation of the handler block in
the faulting load op. Now, we directly reference the handler block
instead of using a label. This has the benefits of:
1. MC knows how to issue a label for a BB, so leave that to it.
2. Accessing the target BB from its label is painful, whereas it is
direct from a MBB operand.
Note: The 2 bytes offset in implicit-null-check.ll comes from the
fact the unconditional jumps are not removed anymore, as the whole
terminator sequence is not analyzable anymore.
Will fix it in a subsequence commit.
llvm-svn: 268327
We basically replace:
HoistBB:
cond_br NullBB, NotNullBB
NullBB:
...
NotNullBB:
<reg> = load
into
HoistBB
<reg> = load_faulting_op NullBB
uncond_br NotNullBB
NullBB:
...
NotNullBB: ## <reg> is now live-in of NotNullBB
...
This partially fixes the machine verifier error for
test/CodeGen/X86/implicit-null-check.ll, but it still fails because
of the implicit CFG structure.
llvm-svn: 267817
MachineFunctionProperties represents a set of properties that a MachineFunction
can have at particular points in time. Existing examples of this idea are
MachineRegisterInfo::isSSA() and MachineRegisterInfo::tracksLiveness() which
will eventually be switched to use this mechanism.
This change introduces the AllVRegsAllocated property; i.e. the property that
all virtual registers have been allocated and there are no VReg operands
left.
With this mechanism, passes can declare that they require a particular property
to be set, or that they set or clear properties by implementing e.g.
MachineFunctionPass::getRequiredProperties(). The MachineFunctionPass base class
verifies that the requirements are met, and handles the setting and clearing
based on the delcarations. Passes can also directly query and update the current
properties of the MF if they want to have conditional behavior.
This change annotates the target-independent post-regalloc passes; future
changes will also annotate target-specific ones.
Reviewers: qcolombet, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18421
llvm-svn: 264593
Summary: This patch adds enum value for an existing metadata type -- make.implicit. Using preassigned enum will be helpful to get compile time type checking and avoid string construction and comparison. The patch also changes uses of make.implicit from string metadata to enum metadata. There is no functionality change.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11698
llvm-svn: 243954
Summary:
This change generalizes the implicit null checks pass to work with
instructions that don't have any explicit register defs. This lets us
use X86's `cmp` against memory as faulting load instructions.
Reviewers: reames, JosephTremoulet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11286
llvm-svn: 242703
Summary:
Before this change ImplicitNullChecks would only pick loads of the form:
```
test Reg, Reg
jz elsewhere
fallthrough:
movl 32(Reg), Reg2
```
but not (say)
```
test Reg, Reg
jz elsewhere
fallthrough:
inc Reg3
movl 32(Reg), Reg2
```
This change teaches ImplicitNullChecks to look through "unrelated"
instructions like `inc Reg3` when searching for a load instruction
to convert to a trapping load.
Reviewers: atrick, JosephTremoulet, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11044
llvm-svn: 241850
Summary:
This change introduces a !make.implicit metadata that allows the
frontend to pre-select the set of explicit null checks that will be
considered for transformation into implicit null checks.
The reason for not using profiling data instead of !make.implicit is
explained in the change to `FaultMaps.rst`.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, pgavlin, JosephTremoulet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10824
llvm-svn: 241116
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Eugene Zelenko