The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
Fixes selection for scalar G_SMULH/G_UMULH. Also switches to using
tablegen selected add/sub, which switch to the signed version of the
opcode. This matches the current DAG behavior. We can't drop the
manual selection for add/sub yet, because it's still both for VALU
add/sub and for G_PTR_ADD.
Mostly use SReg_32 instead of SReg_32_XM0 for arbitrary values. This
will allow the register coalescer to do a better job eliminating
copies to m0.
For GlobalISel, as a terrible hack, use SGPR_32 for things that should
use SCC until booleans are solved.
llvm-svn: 375267
Mostsly these would fail due to trying to use SI with a flat
operation. Implementing global loads with MUBUF is more work than
flat, so these won't be handled in the initial load selection.
Others fail because store of s64 won't initially work, as the current
set of patterns expect everything to be turned into v2i32.
llvm-svn: 365493
Matt Arsenault