GCC declares __clear_cache in the gnu modes (-std=gnu++98,
-std=gnu++11), but not in the strict modes (-std=c++98, -std=c++11). This patch
declares it and therefore fixes the build when using one of the strict modes.
llvm-svn: 181785
AArch64 is going to need some kind of cache-invalidation in order to
successfully JIT since it has a weak memory-model. This is provided by
a __clear_cache builtin in libgcc, which acts very much like the
32-bit ARM equivalent (on platforms where it exists).
llvm-svn: 181129
The llvm::sys::AddSignalHandler function (as well as related routines) in
lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc currently registers a signal handler routine
via "sigaction". When this handler is called due to a SIGSEGV, SIGILL or
similar signal, it will show a stack backtrace, deactivate the handler,
and then simply return to the operating system. The intent is that the
OS will now retry execution at the same location as before, which ought
to again trigger the same error condition and cause the same signal to be
delivered again. Since the hander is now deactivated, the OS will take
its default action (usually, terminate the program and possibly create
a core dump).
However, this method doesn't work reliably on System Z: With certain
signals (namely SIGILL, SIGFPE, and SIGTRAP), the program counter stored
by the kernel on the signal stack frame (which is the location where
execution will resume) is not the instruction that triggered the fault,
but then instruction *after it*. When the LLVM signal handler simply
returns to the kernel, execution will then resume at *that* address,
which will not trigger the problem again, but simply go on and execute
potentially unrelated code leading to random errors afterwards.
To fix this, the patch simply goes and re-raises the signal in question
directly from the handler instead of returning from it. This is done
only on System Z and only for those signals that have this particular
problem.
llvm-svn: 181010
If the directory that will contain the unique file doesn't exist when
we tried to create the file, but another process creates it before we
get a chance to try creating it, we would bail out rather than try to
create the unique file.
llvm-svn: 178908
it's only really useful if you're going to crash anyways. Use it in the pretty stack trace
printer to kill the compiler if we hang while printing the stack trace.
llvm-svn: 177962
to create the parent path.
This can happen if the path is a relative filename and the current directory was removed.
Thanks to Daniel D. for the hint in fixing it.
llvm-svn: 176226
This change lets us bootstrap LLVM/Clang under ASan and MSan. It contains
fixes for 2 issues:
- X86JIT reads return address from stack, which MSan does not know is
initialized.
- bugpoint tests run binaries with RLIMIT_AS. This does not work with certain
Sanitizers.
We are no longer including config.h in Compiler.h with this change.
llvm-svn: 174306
Remove the use of the 't' length modifier to avoid a gcc warning. Based
on usage, 32 bits of precision is good enough for printing a stack
offset for a stack trace.
't' length modifier isn't in C++03 but it *is* in C++11. Added a FIXME
to reintroduce once LLVM makes the switch to C++11.
Reviewer: gribozavr
llvm-svn: 173711
leaving this undefined, and despite the sentence in the standard that
seems to require it, I'll cede the point and assume its a bug in the
wording. Other parts of POSIX regularly allow for things to be -1
instead of undefined, this should too. Makes things more consistent too.
This should have to real impact for folks though.
llvm-svn: 171574
defines _POSIX_CPUTIME but doesn't support the clock_* functions.
I don't test the value of _POSIX_CPUTIME because the spec merely says
that if it is defined, the CPU-specific timers are available, whereas it
says that _POSIX_TIMERS must be defined and defined to a value greater
than zero. However, this may not work, as the POSIX spec clearly states:
"If the symbolic constant _POSIX_CPUTIME is defined, then the symbolic
constant _POSIX_TIMERS shall also be defined by the implementation to
have the value 200112L."
If this doesn't work, I'll add more hacks for Darwin.
llvm-svn: 171565
wall time, user time, and system time since a process started.
For walltime, we currently use TimeValue's interface and a global
initializer to compute a close approximation of total process runtime.
For user time, this adds support for an somewhat more precise timing
mechanism -- clock_gettime with the CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock
selected.
For system time, we have to do a full getrusage call to extract the
system time from the OS. This is expensive but unavoidable.
In passing, clean up the implementation of the old APIs and fix some
latent bugs in the Windows code. This might have manifested on Windows
ARM systems or other systems with strange 64-bit integer behavior.
The old API for this both user time and system time simultaneously from
a single getrusage call. While this results in fewer system calls, it
also results in a lower precision user time and if only user time is
desired, it introduces a higher overhead. It may be worthwhile to switch
some of the pass timers to not track system time and directly track user
and wall time. The old API also tracked walltime in a confusing way --
it just set it to the current walltime rather than providing any measure
of wall time since the process started the way buth user and system time
are tracked. The new API is more consistent here.
The plan is to eventually implement these methods for a *child* process
by using the wait3(2) system call to populate an rusage struct
representing the whole subprocess execution. That way, after waiting on
a child process its stats will become accurate and cheap to query.
llvm-svn: 171551
Implement the old API in terms of the new one. This simplifies the
implementation on Windows which can now re-use the self_process's once
initialization.
llvm-svn: 171330
Fix a truly odd namespace qualifier that was flat out wrong in the
process. The fully qualified namespace would have been
llvm::sys::TimeValue, llvm::TimeValue makes no sense.
llvm-svn: 171292
The coding style used here is not LLVM's style because this is modeled
after a Boost interface and thus done in the style of a candidate C++
standard library interface. I'll probably end up proposing it as
a standard C++ library if it proves to be reasonably portable and
useful.
This is just the most basic parts of the interface -- getting the
process ID out of it. However, it helps sketch out some of the boiler
plate such as the base class, derived class, shared code, and static
factory function. It also introduces a unittest so that I can
incrementally ensure this stuff works.
However, I've not even compiled this code for Windows yet. I'll try to
fix any Windows fallout from the bots, and if I can't fix it I'll revert
and get someone on Windows to help out. There isn't a lot more that is
mandatory, so soon I'll switch to just stubbing out the Windows side and
get Michael Spencer to help with implementation as he can test it
directly.
llvm-svn: 171289
missed in the first pass because the script didn't yet handle include
guards.
Note that the script is now able to handle all of these headers without
manual edits. =]
llvm-svn: 169224
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Rationale:
1) This was the name in the comment block. ;]
2) It matches Clang's __has_feature naming convention.
3) It matches other compiler-feature-test conventions.
Sorry for the noise. =]
I've also switch the comment block to use a \brief tag and not duplicate
the name.
llvm-svn: 168996
- The code could infinite loop trying to create unique files, if the directory
containing the unique file exists, but open() calls on non-existent files in
the path return ENOENT. This is true on the /dev/fd filesystem, for example.
- Will add a clang side test case for this.
llvm-svn: 168081
For example, under a Linux chroot, /proc/ might not be mounted.
Therefor, we test if this file exist. If it is the case, use it (the current
behavior). Otherwise, we fall back to the detection used by *BSD.
The issue has been reported initially on the Debian bug tracker:
http://bugs.debian.org/674588
llvm-svn: 164676
whether or not we want to print out backtrace information. Useful
for libraries that don't need backtrace information on a crash.
rdar://11844710
llvm-svn: 164426
Rafael Espindola