This just removes the usage of llvm::reverse and llvm::seq. That makes
it harder to handle the empty case correctly and so I've also added
a test there.
This is just a shot in the dark at what might be behind the buildbot
failures. I can't reproduce any issues locally including with ASan...
I feel like I'm missing something...
llvm-svn: 290954
This is both convenient and more efficient as we can skip any
intermediate reallocation of the vector.
This usage pattern came up in a subsequent patch on the pass manager,
but it seems generically useful so I factored it out and added unittests
here.
llvm-svn: 290952
The bug was introduced in r289619.
Reviewers: Mehdi Amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28134
llvm-svn: 290749
Summary:
This class is unnecessary.
Its comment indicated that it was a compile error to allocate an
instance of a class that inherits from RefCountedBaseVPTR on the stack.
This may have been true at one point, but it's not today.
Moreover you really do not want to allocate *any* refcounted object on
the stack, vptrs or not, so if we did have a way to prevent these
objects from being stack-allocated, we'd want to apply it to regular
RefCountedBase too, obviating the need for a separate RefCountedBaseVPTR
class.
It seems that the main way RefCountedBaseVPTR provides safety is by
making its subclass's destructor virtual. This may have been helpful at
one point, but these days clang will emit an error if you define a class
with virtual functions that inherits from RefCountedBase but doesn't
have a virtual destructor.
Reviewers: compnerd, dblaikie
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28162
llvm-svn: 290717
This recommits r290512 that was reverted when MSVC failed to compile it. Since
then I've played with various approaches using rextester.com (where I was able
to reproduce the failure) and think that I have a solution thanks in part to
the help of Dave Blaikie! It seems MSVC just has a defective `decltype` in this
version. Manually writing out the type seems to do the trick, even though it is
.... quite complicated.
Original commit message:
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
llvm-svn: 290528
This code doesn't work on MSVC for reasons that elude me and I've not
yet covinced a workaround to compile cleanly so reverting for now while
I play with it.
llvm-svn: 290513
This allows both defining convenience iterator/range accessors on types
which walk across N different independent ranges within the object, and
more direct and simple usages with range based for loops such as shown
in the unittest. The same facilities are used for both. They end up
quite small and simple as it happens.
I've also switched an iterator on `Module` to use this. I would like to
add another convenience iterator that includes even more sequences as
part of it and seeing this one already present motivated me to actually
abstract it away and introduce a general utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28093
llvm-svn: 290512
unittests/ADT/TwineTest.cpp:106:38: error: field 'Count' will be initialized after base 'llvm::FormatAdapter<int>' [-Werror,-Wreorder]
explicit formatter(int &Count) : Count(Count), FormatAdapter(0) {}
llvm-svn: 290029
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Summary:
Given a flag (-mllvm -reverse-iterate) this patch will enable iteration of SmallPtrSet in reverse order.
The idea is to compile the same source with and without this flag and expect the code to not change.
If there is a difference in codegen then it would mean that the codegen is sensitive to the iteration order of SmallPtrSet.
This is enabled only with LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dexonsmith, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mgorny, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26718
llvm-svn: 289619
StringLiteral is a wrapper around a string literal useful for
replacing global tables of char arrays with global tables of
StringRefs that can initialized in a constexpr context, avoiding
the invocation of a global constructor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27686
llvm-svn: 289551
Summary:
I looked at libgcc's implementation (which is based on the paper,
Software for Doubled-Precision Floating-Point Computations", by Seppo Linnainmaa,
ACM TOMS vol 7 no 3, September 1981, pages 272-283.) and made it generic to
arbitrary IEEE floats.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26817
llvm-svn: 289472
Summary:
Fixes PR30869.
In D25977 I meant to change all functions that care about lifetime. I
changed constructors, factory functions, but I missed member/free
functions that return new instances. This patch changes them.
Reviewers: hfinkel, kbarton, echristo, joerg
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26269
llvm-svn: 286060
Summary:
These functions currently require that the new closed interval has a length of
at least 2. They also currently permit empty half-open intervals. This patch
defines nonEmpty in each traits structure and uses it to correct the
implementations of setStart and setStop.
Reviewers: stoklund, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26064
llvm-svn: 285957
This augments the STLExtras toolset with a zip iterator and range
adapter. Zip comes in two varieties: `zip`, which will zip to the
shortest of the input ranges, and `zip_first`, which limits its
`begin() == end()` checks to just the first range.
Recommit r284035 after MSVC2013 support has been dropped.
Patch by: Bryant Wong <github.com/bryant>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23252
llvm-svn: 284623
This augments the STLExtras toolset with a zip iterator and range
adapter. Zip comes in two varieties: `zip`, which will zip to the
shortest of the input ranges, and `zip_first`, which limits its
`begin() == end()` checks to just the first krange.
Patch by: Bryant Wong <github.com/bryant>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23252
llvm-svn: 284035
This re-applies r283798, disabled in r283803, with the static_assert
tests disabled under MSVC. The deleted functions still seem to catch
mistakes in MSVC, so it's not a significant loss.
Part of rdar://problem/16375365
llvm-svn: 283935
This reverts commit r283798, as it causes static asserts on
MSVC 2015 with the following errors:
ArrayRefTest.cpp(38): error C2338: Assigning from single prvalue element
ArrayRefTest.cpp(41): error C2338: Assigning from single xvalue element
ArrayRefTest.cpp(47): error C2338: Assigning from an initializer list
llvm-svn: 283803
llvm::cl already has a function called llvm::apply() so this is
causing an ODR violation. The STLExtras version should win the
vote on which one gets to be called apply() since it is named
after the equivalent STL function, but since renaiming the cl
version is more difficult, let's do this for now to get the
bots green.
llvm-svn: 283800
Without this, the following statements will create ArrayRefs that
refer to temporary storage that goes out of scope by the end of the
line:
someArrayRef = getSingleElement();
someArrayRef = {elem1, elem2};
Note that the constructor still has this problem:
ArrayRef<Element> someArrayRef = getSingleElement();
ArrayRef<Element> someArrayRef = {elem1, elem2};
but that's a little harder to get rid of because we want to be able to
use this in calls:
takesArrayRef(getSingleElement());
takesArrayRef({elem1, elem2});
Part of rdar://problem/16375365. Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
llvm-svn: 283798
This is equivalent to the C++14 std::apply(). Since we are not
using C++14 yet, this allows us to still make use of apply anyway.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25100
llvm-svn: 283779
Summary: The keys must still be copyable, because we store two copies of them.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25404
llvm-svn: 283764
Dan Gohman