The as-options.s test writes to the build tree as of r367165. Some build systems configure this to be readonly, so this fails. Explicitly write to the output tree using `%t` to avoid this.
llvm-svn: 367253
Same kind of fix as in r367176, but for "RUN on line 76"
this time.
I'll ask for a post-commit review, to ensure this
matches the intention with the test added in r367165.
But I think this at least will make the buildbots a
little bit happier.
llvm-svn: 367182
This morally relands r365703 (and r365714), originally reviewed at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64527, but with a different implementation.
Relanding the same approach with a fix for the revert reason got a bit
involved (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D65108) so use a simpler approach
with a more localized implementation (that in return duplicates code
a bit more).
This approach also doesn't validate flags for the integrated assembler
if the assembler step doesn't run.
Fixes PR42066.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65233
llvm-svn: 367165
clang currently warns when passing flags for the assembler (e.g.
-Wa,-mbig-obj) to an invocation that doesn't run the assembler (e.g.
-E).
At first sight, that makes sense -- the flag really is unused. But many
other flags don't have an effect if no assembler runs (e.g.
-fno-integrated-as, -ffunction-sections, and many others), and those
currently don't warn. So this seems more like a side effect of how
CollectArgsForIntegratedAssembler() is implemented than like an
intentional feature.
Since it's a bit inconvenient when debugging builds and adding -E,
always call CollectArgsForIntegratedAssembler() to make sure assembler
args always get claimed. Currently, this affects only these flags:
-mincremental-linker-compatible, -mimplicit-it= (on ARM), -Wa, -Xassembler
It does have the side effect that assembler options now need to be valid
even if -E is passed. Previously, `-Wa,-mbig-obj` would error for
non-coff output only if the assembler ran, now it always errors. This
too makes assembler flags more consistent with all the other flags and
seems like a progression.
Fixes PR42066.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64527
llvm-svn: 365703
Douglas Yung