This CL applies the same pattern as AffineExpr to AffineMap: a simple struct
that acts as the storage is allocated in the bump pointer. The AffineMap is
immutable and accessed everywhere by value.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216445930
Add target independent standard DMA ops: dma.start, dma.wait. Update pipeline
data transfer to use these to detect DMA ops.
While on this
- return failure from mlir-opt::performActions if a pass generates invalid output
- improve error message for verify 'n' operand traits
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216429885
This CL sketches what it takes for AffineExpr to fully have by-value semantics
and not be a not-so-smart pointer anymore.
This essentially makes the underyling class a simple storage struct and
implements the operations on the value type directly. Since there is no
forwarding of operations anymore, we can full isolate the storage class and
make a hard visibility barrier by moving detail::AffineExpr into
AffineExprDetail.h.
AffineExprDetail.h is only included where storage-related information is
needed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216385459
This CL:
1. performs the global codemod AffineXExpr->AffineXExprClass and
AffineXExprRef -> AffineXExpr;
2. simplifies function calls by removing the redundant MLIRContext parameter;
3. adds missing binary operator versions of scalar op AffineExpr where it
makes sense.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216242674
This CL introduces a series of cleanups for AffineExpr value types:
1. to make it clear that the value types should be used, the pointer
AffineExpr types are put in the detail namespace. Unfortunately, since the
value type operator-> only forwards to the underlying pointer type, we
still
need to expose this in the include file for now;
2. AffineExprKind is ok to use, it thus comes out of detail and thus of
AffineExpr
3. getAffineDimExpr, getAffineSymbolExpr, getAffineConstantExpr are
similarly
extracted as free functions and their naming is mande consistent across
Builder, MLContext and AffineExpr
4. AffineBinaryOpEx::simplify functions are made into static free
functions.
In particular it is moved away from AffineMap.cpp where it does not belong
5. operator AffineExprType is made explicit
6. uses the binary operators everywhere possible
7. drops the pointer usage everywhere outside of AffineExpr.cpp,
MLIRContext.cpp and AsmPrinter.cpp
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216207212
This CL makes AffineExprRef into a value type.
Notably:
1. drops llvm isa, cast, dyn_cast on pointer type and uses member functions on
the value type. It may be possible to still use classof (in a followup CL)
2. AffineBaseExprRef aggressively casts constness away: if we mean the type is
immutable then let's jump in with both feet;
3. Drop implicit casts to the underlying pointer type because that always
results in surprising behavior and is not needed in practice once enough
cleanup has been applied.
The remaining negative I see is that we still need to mix operator. and
operator->. There is an ugly solution that forwards the methods but that ends
up duplicating the class hierarchy which I tried to avoid as much as
possible. But maybe it's not that bad anymore since AffineExpr.h would still
contain a single class hierarchy (the duplication would be impl detail in.cpp)
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216188003
1) affineint (as it is named) is not a type suitable for general computation (e.g. the multiply/adds in an integer matmul). It has undefined width and is undefined on overflow. They are used as the indices for forstmt because they are intended to be used as indexes inside the loop.
2) It can be used in both cfg and ml functions, and in cfg functions. As you mention, “symbols” are not affine, and we use affineint values for symbols.
3) Integers aren’t affine, the algorithms applied to them can be. :)
4) The only suitable use for affineint in MLIR is for indexes and dimension sizes (i.e. the bounds of those indexes).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 216057974
- Fold the lower/upper bound of a loop to a constant whenever the result of the
application of the bound's affine map on the operand list yields a constant.
- Update/complete 'for' stmt's API to set lower/upper bounds with operands.
Resolve TODOs for ForStmt::set{Lower,Upper}Bound.
- Moved AffineExprConstantFolder into AffineMap.cpp and added
AffineMap::constantFold to be used by both AffineApplyOp and
ForStmt::constantFoldBound.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215997346
with a new one (of a potentially different rank/shape) with an optional index
remapping.
- introduce Utils::replaceAllMemRefUsesWith
- use this for DMA double buffering
(This CL also adds a few temporary utilities / code that will be done away with
once:
1) abstract DMA op's are added
2) memref deferencing side-effect / trait is available on op's
3) b/117159533 is resolved (memref index computation slices).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215831373
This CL starts by replacing AffineExpr* with value-type AffineExprRef in a few
places in the IR. By a domino effect that is pretty telling of the
inconsistencies in the codebase, const is removed where it makes sense.
The rationale is that the decision was concisously made that unique'd types
have pointer semantics without const specifier. This is fine but we should be
consistent. In the end, the only logical invariant is that there should never
be such a thing as a const AffineExpr*, const AffineMap* or const IntegerSet*
in our codebase.
This CL takes a number of shortcuts to killing const with fire, in particular
forcing const AffineExprRef to return the underlying non-const
AffineExpr*. This will be removed once AffineExpr* has disappeared in
containers but for now such shortcuts allow a bit of sanity in this long quest
for cleanups.
The **only** places where const AffineExpr*, const AffineMap* or const
IntegerSet* may still appear is by transitive needs from containers,
comparison operators etc.
There is still one major thing remaining here: figure out why cast/dyn_cast
return me a const AffineXXX*, which in turn requires a bunch of ugly
const_casts. I suspect this is due to the classof
taking const AffineXXXExpr*. I wonder whether this is a side effect of 1., if
it is coming from llvm itself (I'd doubt it) or something else (clattner@?)
In light of this, the whole discussion about const makes total sense to me now
and I would systematically apply the rule that in the end, we should never
have any const XXX in our codebase for unique'd types (assuming we can remove
them all in containers and no additional constness constraint is added on us
from the outside world).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215811554
This CL implements AffineExprBaseRef as a templated type to allow LLVM-style
casts to work properly. This also allows making AffineExprBaseRef::expr
private.
To achieve this, it is necessary to use llvm::simplify_type and make
AffineConstExpr derive from both AffineExpr and llvm::simplify<AffineExprRef>.
Note that llvm::simplify_type is just an interface to enable the proper
template resolution of isa/cast/dyn_cast but it otherwise holds no value.
Lastly note that certain dyn_cast operations wanted the const AffineExpr* form
of AffineExprBaseRef so I made the implicit constructor take that by default
and documented the immutable behavior. I think this is consistent with the
decision to make unique'd type immutable by convention and never use const on
them.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215642247
This CL uniformizes the uses of AffineExprWrap outside of IR.
The public API of AffineExpr builder is modified to only use AffineExprWrap.
A few places access AffineExprWrap.expr, this is only while the API is in
transition to easily keep track (i.e. make expr private and let the compiler
track the errors).
Parser.cpp exhibits patterns that are dependent on nullptr values so
converting it is left for another CL.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215642005
This CL proposes adding MLIRContext* to AffineExpr as discussed previously.
This allows the value class to not require the context in its constructor and
makes it a POD that it makes sense to pass by value everywhere.
A list of other RFC CLs will build on this. The RFC CLs are small incremental
pushes of the API which would be a pretty big change otherwise.
Pushing the thinking a little bit more it seems reasonable to use implicit
cast/constructor to/from AffineExpr*.
As this thing evolves, it looks to me like IR (and
probably Parser, for not so good reasons) want to operate on AffineExpr* and
the rest of the code wants to operate on the value type.
For this reason I think AffineExprImpl*/AffineExpr may also make sense but I
do not have a particular naming preference.
The jury is still out for naming decision between the above and
AffineExprBase*/AffineExpr or AffineExpr*/AffineExprRef.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215641596
This CL argues that the builder API for AffineExpr should be used
with a lightweight wrapper that supports operators chaining.
This CL takes the ill-named AffineExprWrap and proposes a simple
set of operators with builtin constant simplifications.
This allows:
1. removing the getAddMulPureAffineExpr function;
2. avoiding concerns about constant vs non-constant simplifications
at **every call site**;
3. writing the mathematical expressions we want to write without unnecessary
obfuscations.
The points above represent pure technical debt that we don't want to carry on.
It is important to realize that this is not a mere convenience or "just sugar"
but reduction in cognitive overhead.
This thinking can be pushed significantly further, I have added some comments
with some basic ideas but we could make AffineMap, AffineApply and other
objects that use map applications more functional and value-based.
I am putting this out to get a first batch of reviews and see what people
think.
I think in my preferred design I would have the Builder directly return such
AffineExprPtr objects by value everywhere and avoid the boilerplate explicit
creations that I am doing by hand at this point.
Yes this AffineExprPtr would implicitly convert to AffineExpr* because that is
what it is.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215641317
- introduce mlir::{floorDiv, ceilDiv, mod} for constant inputs in
mlir/Support/MathExtras.h
- consistently use these everywhere in IR, Analysis, and Transforms.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 215580677
mode. We even diagnose mistakes nicely (aside from the a/an vowel confusion
which isn't worth worrying about):
test/IR/invalid.mlir split at line tensorflow/mlir#399:8:34: error: 'note' diagnostic emitted when expecting a 'error'
%x = "bar"() : () -> i32 // expected-error {{operand defined here}}
^
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214773208
- makes the code compact (gets rid of MLFunction walking logic)
- makes it natural to extend to fold affine map loop bounds
and if conditions (upcoming CL)
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214668957
ResultIsFloatLike/ResultIsIntegerLike, move some code out of templates into
shared code, keep the ops in StandardOps.cpp/h sorted.
This significantly reduces the boilerplate for Add/Mul sorts of ops. In a subsequent patch, I plan to rename OpBase to Op, but didn't want to clutter this diff.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214622871
This CL retricts shorthand notation printing to only the bounds that can
be roundtripped unambiguously; i.e.:
1. ()[]->(%some_cst) ()[]
2. ()[s0]->(s0) ()[%some_symbol]
Upon inspection it turns out that the constant case was lossy so this CL also
updates it.
Note however that fixing this issue exhibits a potential issues in unroll.mlir.
L488 exhibits a map ()[s0] -> (1)()[%arg0] which could be simplified down to
()[]->(1)()[].
This does not seem like a bug but maybe an undesired complexity in the maps
generated by unrolling.
bondhugula@, care to take a look?
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214531410
This CL adds support for `mulf` which is necessary to write/emit a simple scalar
matmul in MLIR. This CL does not consider automation of generation of ops but
mulf is important and useful enough to be added on its own atm.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214496098
Super thin slice that can convert a MLIR program (with addfs) to MLIR HLO dialect. Add this as translations to mlir-translate. Also add hlo::AddOp op and HLO op registration.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214480409
The AsmPrinter wrongly assumes that all single ssa-id AffineMap
are the identity map for the purpose of printing.
This CL adds the missing level of indirection as well as a test.
This bug was originally shaken off by the experimental TC->MLIR path.
Before this CL, the test would print:
```
mlfunc @mlfuncsimplemap(%arg0 : affineint, %arg1 : affineint, %arg2 : affineint) {
for %i0 = 0 to %arg0 {
for %i1 = 0 to %i0 {
~~~ should be %arg1
%c42_i32 = constant 42 : i32
}
}
return
}
```
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214120817
Instead of linking in different initializeMLIRContext functions, add a registry mechanism and function to initialize all registered ops in a given MLIRContext. Initialize all registered ops along with the StandardOps when constructing a MLIRContext.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214073842
consolidate the implementations in CFGFunctionViewGraph.cpp into it, and
implement the missing const specializations for functions. NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214048649
verifier. We get most of this infrastructure directly from LLVM, we just
need to adapt it to our CFG abstraction.
This has a few unrelated changes engangled in it:
- getFunction() in various classes was const incorrect, fix it.
- This moves Verifier.cpp to the analysis library, since Verifier depends on
dominance and these are both really analyses.
- IndexedAccessorIterator::reference was defined wrong, leading to really
exciting template errors that were fun to diagnose.
- This flips the boolean sense of the foldOperation() function in constant
folding pass in response to previous patch feedback.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 214046593
Alternatively, we can defined a TFComplexType with a width parameter in the
mlir, then both types can be converted to the same mlir type with different width (like IntegerType).
We chose to use a direct mapping because there are only two TF Complex types.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 213856651
optimization pass:
- Give the ability for operations to implement a constantFold hook (a simple
one for single-result ops as well as general support for multi-result ops).
- Implement folding support for constant and addf.
- Implement support in AbstractOperation and Operation to make this usable by
clients.
- Implement a very simple constant folding pass that does top down folding on
CFG and ML functions, with a testcase that exercises all the above stuff.
Random cleanups:
- Improve the build APIs for ConstantOp.
- Stop passing "-o -" to mlir-opt in the testsuite, since that is the default.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 213749809
- extend loop unroll-jam similar to loop unroll for affine bounds
- extend both loop unroll/unroll-jam to deal with cleanup loop for non multiple
of unroll factor.
- extend promotion of single iteration loops to work with affine bounds
- fix typo bugs in loop unroll
- refactor common code b/w loop unroll and loop unroll-jam
- move prototypes of non-pass transforms to LoopUtils.h
- add additional builder methods.
- introduce loopUnrollUpTo(factor) to unroll by either factor or trip count,
whichever is less.
- remove Statement::isInnermost (not used for now - will come back at the right
place/in right form later)
PiperOrigin-RevId: 213471227
mlir-translate is a tool to translate from/to MLIR. The translations are registered at link time and intended for use in tests. An identity transformation (mlir-to-mlir) is registered by default as example and used in the parser test where simply parsing & printing required.
The TranslateFunctions take filenames (instead of MemoryBuffer) to allow translations special write behavior (e.g., writing to uncommon filesystems).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 213370448
Nicolas Vasilache