The support for relax relocations is dependent on the linker and
different toolchains within the same compiler can be using different
linkers some of which may or may not support relax relocations.
Give toolchains the option to control whether they want to use relax
relocations in addition to the existing (global) build system option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39831
llvm-svn: 318816
Passing a flavor to LLD requires command line argument, but if these
are being passed through a response file, this will fail because LLD
needs to know which driver to use before processing the response file.
Use ld.lld directly instead to avoid this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39176
llvm-svn: 316379
This regressed for x86-64 in r307856 because it's no longer inherited
from Generic_GCC. We'd never noticed that it was missing other
targets (i.e. aarch64), but Fuchsia is uniform across all machines.
Patch by Roland McGrath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37723
llvm-svn: 312989
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35328
llvm-svn: 307856
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32613
llvm-svn: 307830
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Petr Hosek