ARM symbol variants are written with parens instead of @ like this:
.word __GLOBAL_I_a(target1)
This commit adds support for parsing these symbol variants in
expressions. We introduce a new flag to MCAsmInfo that indicates the
parser should use parens to parse the symbol variant. The expression
parser is modified to look for symbol variants using parens instead
of @ when the corresponding MCAsmInfo flag is true.
The MCAsmInfo parens flag is enabled only for ARM on ELF.
By adding this flag to MCAsmInfo, we are able to get rid of
redundant ARM-specific symbol variants and use the generic variants
instead (e.g. VK_GOT instead of VK_ARM_GOT). We use the new
UseParensForSymbolVariant attribute in MCAsmInfo to correctly print
the symbol variants for arm.
To achive this we need to keep a handle to the MCAsmInfo in the
MCSymbolRefExpr class that we can check when printing the symbol
variant.
Updated Tests:
Changed case of symbol variant to match the generic kind.
test/CodeGen/ARM/tls-models.ll
test/CodeGen/ARM/tls1.ll
test/CodeGen/ARM/tls2.ll
test/CodeGen/Thumb2/tls1.ll
test/CodeGen/Thumb2/tls2.ll
PR18080
llvm-svn: 196424
and update ELF header e_flags.
Currently gathering information such as symbol,
section and data is done by collecting it in an
MCAssembler object. From MCAssembler and MCAsmLayout
objects ELFObjectWriter::WriteObject() forms and
streams out the ELF object file.
This patch just adds a few members to the MCAssember
class to store and access the e_flag settings. It
allows for runtime additions to the e_flag by
assembler directives. The standalone assembler can
get to MCAssembler from getParser().getStreamer().getAssembler().
This patch is the generic infrastructure and will be
followed by patches for ARM and Mips for their target
specific use.
Contributer: Jack Carter
llvm-svn: 173882
Add R_ARM_NONE and R_ARM_PREL31 relocation types
to MCExpr. Both of them will be used while
generating .ARM.extab and .ARM.exidx sections.
llvm-svn: 169965
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
We on the linker to resolve calls to the appropriate BL/BLX instruction
to make interworking function correctly. It uses the symbol in the
relocation to do that, so we need to be careful about being too clever.
To enable this for ARM mode, split the BL/BLX fixup kind off from the
unconditional-branch fixups.
rdar://10927209
llvm-svn: 151571
This enables the linker to match concrete relocation types (absolute or relative) with whatever library or C++ support code is being linked against.
llvm-svn: 149057
David Peixotto