This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.
So, the following code is now legal:
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int);
void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));
In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.
This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332
llvm-svn: 306467
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
declaration, since attributes that affect mangling may have been added
to subsequent declarations. However, to determine the linkage of the
declaration, we need to look at the canonical declaration. Fixes PR4412.
llvm-svn: 85400
1. it wasn't applying to definitions, only declarations, e.g. int x __asm("foo")
2. multiple definitions were conflicting, they weren't getting merged.
3. the code was duplicated in several places.
llvm-svn: 67442
George Burgess IV