IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
Improves atom scheduler test coverage (to make it easier to upgrade them for PR32431).
Merged SSE_VEC_BIT_ITINS_P + SSE_BIT_ITINS_P as we were interchanging between them.
llvm-svn: 309715
Summary: The 64-bit 'and' with immediate instruction only supports a 32-bit immediate. So for larger constants we have to load the constant into a register first. If the immediate happens to be a mask we can use the BEXTRI instruction to perform the masking. We already do something similar using the BZHI instruction from the BMI2 instruction set.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36129
llvm-svn: 309706
Improves atom scheduler test coverage (to make it easier to upgrade them for PR32431).
Checked on Agner that these actually match the UNPACK schedules, but better to include a separate class
llvm-svn: 309701
We were already using the 32 bit element opcode if BWI isn't enabled, but there's no reason to change opcode if we have BWI. We will still use the 8/16 opcodes for masked stores though.
This allows us to use the aligned opcode when we can which makes our test output more consistent between different modes. It also reduces the number of isel patterns we need.
This is a slight inconsistency with loads which default to 64 bit element opcodes. I'll probably rectify that in a future patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35978
llvm-svn: 309693
These were taking priority over the aligned load instructions since there is no vmovda8/16. I don't think there is really a difference between aligned and unaligned on newer cpus so I don't think it matters which instructions we use.
But with this change we reduce the size of the isel table a little and we allow the aligned information to pass through to the evex->vec pass and produce the same output has avx/avx2 in some cases.
I also generally dislike patterns rooted in a bitcast which these were.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35977
llvm-svn: 309589
Added patterns to recognize AND 1 on the mask of a scalar masked
move is not needed since only the lower bit is relevant for the
instruction.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35897
llvm-svn: 309546
MS ignores the keyword "short" when used after a jc/jz instruction, LLVM ought to do the same.
Test: D35893
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35892
llvm-svn: 309509
This patch is in 2 parts:
1 - replace combineBT's use of SimplifyDemandedBits (hasOneUse only) with SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to more aggressively determine the lower bits used by BT.
2 - update SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to support ANY_EXTEND - if the demanded bits are only in the non-extended portion, then peek through and demand from the source value and then ANY_EXTEND that if we found a match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35896
llvm-svn: 309486
This commit
- Removes IsTailCall and replaces it with a target-defined unsigned
- Refactors getOutliningCallOverhead and getOutliningFrameOverhead so that they don't use IsTailCall
- Adds a call class + frame class classification to OutlinedFunction and Candidate respectively
This accomplishes a couple things.
Firstly, we don't need the notion of *tail call* in the general outlining algorithm.
Secondly, we now can have different "outlining classes" for each candidate within a set of candidates.
This will make it easy to add new ways to outline sequences for certain targets and dynamically choose
an appropriate cost model for a sequence depending on the context that that sequence lives in.
Ultimately, this should get us closer to being able to do something like, say avoid saving the link
register when outlining AArch64 instructions.
llvm-svn: 309475
This is some more cleanup in preparation for some actual
functional changes. This splits getOutliningBenefit into
two cost functions: getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead. These functions return the
number of instructions that would be required to call
a specific function and the number of instructions
that would be required to construct a frame for a
specific funtion. The actual outlining benefit logic
is moved into the outliner, which calls these functions.
The goal of refactoring getOutliningBenefit is to:
- Get us closer to getting rid of the IsTailCall flag
- Further split up "target-specific" things and
"general algorithm" things
llvm-svn: 309356
The X86 tail call eligibility logic was correct when it was written, but
the addition of inalloca and argument copy elision broke its
assumptions. It was assuming that fixed stack objects were immutable.
Currently, we aim to emit a tail call if no arguments have to be
re-arranged in memory. This code would trace the outgoing argument
values back to check if they are loads from an incoming stack object.
If the stack argument is immutable, then we won't need to store it back
to the stack when we tail call.
Fortunately, stack objects track their mutability, so we can just make
the obvious check to fix the bug.
This was http://crbug.com/749826
llvm-svn: 309343
Like r309323, X86 had a typo where it passed the wrong flags to TLO.
Found by inspection; I haven't been able to tickle this into having
observable behavior. I don't think it does, given that X86 doesn't have
custom demanded bits logic, and the generic logic doesn't have a lot of
exposure to illegal constructs.
llvm-svn: 309325
Assign all concat elements to zero and then just replace the first element, instead of setting them all to null and copying everything in.
llvm-svn: 309261
This patch expands the support of lowerInterleavedStore to 32x8i stride 4.
LLVM creates suboptimal shuffle code-gen for AVX2. In overall, this patch is a specific fix for the pattern (Strid=4 VF=32) and we plan to include more patterns in the future. To reach our goal of "more patterns". We include two mask creators. The first function creates shuffle's mask equivalent to unpacklo/unpackhi instructions. The other creator creates mask equivalent to a concat of two half vectors(high/low).
The patch goal is to optimize the following sequence:
At the end of the computation, we have ymm2, ymm0, ymm12 and ymm3 holding
each 32 chars:
c0, c1, , c31
m0, m1, , m31
y0, y1, , y31
k0, k1, ., k31
And these need to be transposed/interleaved and stored like so:
c0 m0 y0 k0 c1 m1 y1 k1 c2 m2 y2 k2 c3 m3 y3 k3 ....
Reviewers:
dorit
Farhana
RKSimon
guyblank
DavidKreitzer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34601
llvm-svn: 309086
Changing mask argument type from const SmallVectorImpl<int>& to
ArrayRef<int>.
This came up in D35700 where a mask is received as an ArrayRef<int> and
we want to pass it to TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal().
Also saves a few lines of code.
llvm-svn: 309085
splitting patch D34601 into two part. This part changes the location of two functions.
The second part will be based on that patch. This was requested by @RKSimon.
Reviewers:
1. dorit
2. Farhana
3. RKSimon
4. guyblank
5. DavidKreitzer
llvm-svn: 309084
Summary: The aligned load predicates don't suppress themselves if the load is non-temporal the way the unaligned predicates do. For the most part this isn't a problem because the aligned predicates are mostly used for instructions that only load the the non-temporal loads have priority over those. The exception are masked loads.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35712
llvm-svn: 309079
D35067/rL308322 attempted to support up to 4 load pairs for memcmp inlining which resulted in regressions for some optimized libc memcmp implementations (PR33914).
Until we can match these more optimal cases, this patch reduces the memcmp expansion to a maximum of 2 load pairs (which matches what we do for -Os).
This patch should be considered for the 5.0.0 release branch as well
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35830
llvm-svn: 308986
This reverts r308867 and r308866.
It broke the sanitizer-windows buildbot on C++ code similar to the
following:
namespace cl { }
void f() {
__asm {
mov al, cl
}
}
t.cpp(4,13): error: unexpected namespace name 'cl': expected expression
mov al, cl
^
In this case, MSVC parses 'cl' as a register, not a namespace.
llvm-svn: 308926
On MS-style, the following snippet:
int eax;
__asm mov eax, ebx
should yield loading of ebx, into the location pointed by the variable eax
This patch sees to it.
Currently, a reg-to-reg move would have been invoked.
clang: D34740
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34739
llvm-svn: 308866
These patterns were only missing to favor using the legacy instructions when the shift was a constant. With careful adjustment of the pattern complexity we can make sure the immediate instructions still have priority over these patterns.
llvm-svn: 308834
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
Currently we only support (i32 bitcast(v32i1)) using the AVX2 VPMOVMSKB ymm instruction.
This patch adds support for splitting pre-AVX2 targets into 2 x (V)PMOVMSKB xmm instructions and merging the integer results.
In future we could probably generalize this to handle more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35303
llvm-svn: 308723
Summary:
This patch adds the following
1. Adds a skeleton scheduler model for AMD Znver1.
2. Introduces the znver1 execution units and pipes.
3. Caters the instructions based on the generic scheduler classes.
4. Further additions to the scheduler model with instruction itineraries will be carried out incrementally based on
a. Instructions types
b. Registers used
5. Since itineraries are not added based on instructions, throughput information are bound to change when incremental changes are added.
6. Scheduler testcases are modified accordingly to suit the new model.
Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian. With minor formatting tweaks from me.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, shivaram, ddibyend, vprasad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35293
llvm-svn: 308411
It should be a win to avoid going out to the system lib for all small memcmp() calls using scalar ops. For x86 32-bit, this means most everything up to 16 bytes. For 64-bit, that doubles because we can do 8-byte loads.
Notes:
Reduced from 4 to 2 loads for -Os behavior, which might not be optimal in all cases. It's effectively a question of how much do we trust the system implementation. Linux and macOS (and Windows I assume, but did not test) have optimized memcmp() code for x86, so it's probably not bad either way? PPC is using 8/4 for defaults on these. We do not expand at all for -Oz.
There are still potential improvements to make for the CGP expansion IR and/or lowering such as avoiding select-of-constants (D34904) and not doing zexts to the max load type before doing a compare.
We have special-case SSE/AVX codegen for (memcmp(x, y, 16/32) == 0) that will no longer be produced after this patch. I've shown the experimental justification for that change in PR33329:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33329#c12
TLDR: While the vector code is a likely winner, we can't guarantee that it's a winner in all cases on all CPUs, so I'm willing to sacrifice it for the greater good of expanding all small memcmp(). If we want to resurrect that codegen, it can be done by adjusting the CGP params or poking a hole to let those fall-through the CGP expansion.
Committed on behalf of Sanjay Patel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35067
llvm-svn: 308322
This isn't legal code, but we shouldn't crash on it. Now we just don't convert the gather intrinsic if the scale isn't constant and let it go through to isel where we'll report an isel failure.
Fixes PR33772.
llvm-svn: 308267
Rename the enum value from X86_64_Win64 to plain Win64.
The symbol exposed in the textual IR is changed from 'x86_64_win64cc'
to 'win64cc', but the numeric value is kept, keeping support for
old bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34474
llvm-svn: 308208
LLVM compiler recognizes opportunities to transform a branch into IR select instruction(s) - later it will be lowered into X86::CMOV instruction, assuming no other optimization eliminated the SelectInst.
However, it is not always profitable to emit X86::CMOV instruction. For example, branch is preferable over an X86::CMOV instruction when:
1. Branch is well predicted
2. Condition operand is expensive, compared to True-value and the False-value operands
In CodeGenPrepare pass there is a shallow optimization that tries to convert SelectInst into branch, but it is not enough.
This commit, implements machine optimization pass that converts X86::CMOV instruction(s) into branch, based on a conservative heuristic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34769
llvm-svn: 308142
FastIsel can't handle them, so we would end up crashing during
register class selection.
Fixes PR26522.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35272
llvm-svn: 307797
The issue is not if the value is pcrel. It is whether we have a
relocation or not.
If we have a relocation, the static linker will select the upper
bits. If we don't have a relocation, we have to do it.
llvm-svn: 307730
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
Summary:
Mark G_ZEXT/G_SEXT i1 to i8/i16, i8 to i16 as legal.
Support G_ZEXT i1 to i8/i16 instruction selection ( C++ code).
This patch requred to support G_LOAD/G_STORE i1.
Reviewers: zvi, guyblank
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: rovka, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35177
llvm-svn: 307526
GHC 8.4 will know how to use YMM and ZMM registers for calls.
Submitted on behalf of @bgamari (Ben Gamari)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34854
llvm-svn: 307504
x86 scalar select-of-constants (Cond ? C1 : C2) combining/lowering is a mess
with missing optimizations. We handle some patterns, but miss logical variants.
To clean that up, we should convert all select-of-constants to logic/math and
enhance the combining for the expected patterns from that. Selecting 0 or -1
needs extra attention to produce the optimal code as shown here.
Attempt to verify that all of these IR forms are logically equivalent:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/plxs
Earlier steps in this series:
rL306040
rL306072
rL307404 (D34652)
As acknowledged in the earlier review, there's a possibility that some Intel
uarch would prefer to produce an xor to clear the fake register operand with
sbb %eax, %eax. This will likely need to be addressed in a separate pass.
llvm-svn: 307471
x86 scalar select-of-constants (Cond ? C1 : C2) combining/lowering is a mess
with missing optimizations. We handle some patterns, but miss logical variants.
To clean that up, we should convert all select-of-constants to logic/math and
enhance the combining for the expected patterns from that. DAGCombiner already
has the foundation to allow the transforms, so we just need to fill in the holes
for x86 math op lowering. Selecting 0 or -1 needs extra attention to produce the
optimal code as shown here.
Attempt to verify that all of these IR forms are logically equivalent:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/plxs
Earlier steps in this series:
rL306040
rL306072
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34652
llvm-svn: 307404
Summary:
Replace the matcher if-statements for each rule with a state-machine. This
significantly reduces compile time, memory allocations, and cumulative memory
allocation when compiling AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp.o after r303259 is
recommitted.
The following patches will expand on this further to fully fix the regressions.
Reviewers: rovka, ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: ab
Subscribers: vitalybuka, aemerson, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33758
llvm-svn: 307079
Summary:
When broadcasting from the constant pool its useful to print out the final vector similar to what we do for normal moves from the constant pool.
I changed only a couple tests that were broadcast focused. One of them had been previously hand tweaked after running the script so that it could check the constant pool declaration. But I think this patch makes that unnecessary now since we can check the comment instead.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34923
llvm-svn: 307062
Summary: I believe this should be supported on GLM since RDSEED is.
Reviewers: m_zuckerman, zvi, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34828
llvm-svn: 307060
Summary:
Add a combine for creating a truncate to replace a build_vector composed of extracts with
indices that form a stride-2^N series.
Example:
v8i32 V = ...
v4i32 build_vector((extract_elt V, 0), (extract_elt V, 2), (extract_elt V, 4), (extract_elt V, 6))
-->
v4i32 truncate (bitcast V to v4i64)
Related discussion in llvm-dev about canonicalizing shuffles to
truncates in LLVM IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108936.html.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, igorb, craig.topper, wolfgangp, delena
Reviewed By: delena
Subscribers: guyblank, delena, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34077
llvm-svn: 307036
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
llvm-svn: 306978
We are combining shuffles to bit shifts before unary permutes, which means we can't fold loads plus the destination register is destructive
The 32-bit shuffles are a bit tricky and will be dealt with in a later patch
llvm-svn: 306977
this patch updates the cost of addq\subq (add\subtract of vectors of 64bits)
based on the performance numbers of SLM arch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33983
llvm-svn: 306974
Rafael Espindola