These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually be adopted and make them
mandatory, but they do seem like good ideas regardless.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2351R0.pdf
This patch implements the paper's effect on:
- std::to_integer, std::to_underlying
- std::forward, std::move, std::move_if_noexcept
- std::as_const
- std::identity
The paper also affects (but libc++ does not yet have an implementation of):
- std::bit_cast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99895
Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.
This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.search.default test cases when built in MSVC/DLL configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99932
Including `<concepts>` in other standard library headers (such as
`<iterator>`) creates circular dependencies due to `<functional>`.
Since `<concepts>` only needs `std::invoke` from `<functional>`, the
easiest, fastest, and cleanest way to eliminate the circular dep is to
move `std::invoke` into `__functional_base`.
This has the added advantage of `<concepts>` not transitively importing
`<functional>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99041
The container headers don't need to include <functional> for any other reason
(or at least, they wouldn't if we moved `less` and `equal_to` out of <functional>),
so let's put `__libcpp_erase_if_container` somewhere that's common to the
containers but outside of <functional>.
Also, calling `std::erase_if(c, pred)` should not trigger ADL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99043
Implement the resolution of LWG2993. Replace a deleted constructor
with a constructor that SFINAEs away in appropriate circumstances.
Also, now that the constructor is templated, we must have an
explicit deduction guide to make CTAD work.
Some tests have been merged in from Agustín Bergé's D40259.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92725
LWG reflector consensus is that this was a bug in libc++.
(In particular, MSVC also will fix it in their STL, soon.)
Bug originally discovered by Logan Smith.
Also fix `std::function<const void()>`, which should work
the same way as `std::function<void()>` in terms of allowing
"conversions" from non-void types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94452
This affects only vectors with weird/malicious allocators,
the same corner case covered in D91708, but for `vector<bool>` this time.
Also ADL-proof <__tree>, which affects only sets and maps with weird/malicious
allocators where the ADL trap is in the *fancy pointer type*.
Also drive-by _VSTD:: qualification in the guts of std::bind,
std::packaged_task, std::condition_variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93424
- std::reference_wrapper
- std::function
- std::mem_fn
While I'm here, remove _VSTD:: qualification from calls to `declval`
because it takes no arguments and thus isn't susceptible to ADL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92884
Everywhere, normalize the whitespace to `::new (EXPR) T`.
Everywhere, normalize the spelling of the cast to `(void*)EXPR`.
Without the cast to `(void*)`, the expression triggers ADL on GCC.
(I think this is a GCC bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249)
Even if it doesn't trigger ADL, it still seems incorrect to use any argument
that's not exactly `(void*)` because that opens the possibility of overload
resolution picking a user-defined overload of `operator new`, which would be
wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93153
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
Block.h is a pretty common name, which can lead to nasty collisions with
user provided headers. Since we're only getting a few simple declarations
from the header, it's better to declare them manually than to include the
header.
rdar://66384326
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85035
Summary: In std::functional moves the reference out of the `__callable` implementation and replaces `_EnableIfCallable` with `_EnableIfLValueCallable` (`_EnableIfLValueCallable` passes `__callable` an lvalue reference type).
Reviewers: ldionne, #libc!
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80071
This patch adds `_VSTD::` to some calls to `make_pair` inside the
implementations of searchers, to prevent things exploding if there is
a make_pair in an associated namespace of a user-defined type.
https://godbolt.org/z/xAFG98
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72640
The runtime for Blocks may not be available even though the Blocks
language extension _is_ available. Instead of potentially failing,
this commit is much more conservative and assumes the runtime for
Blocks is only provided on Apple platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78757
Due to Clang bug http://llvm.org/PR45151, deprecated attributes are not
picked up on partial specializations. This patch instead applies it to
the first declaration of std::function itself.
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
llvm-svn: 367770
The new meta-programming primitives are lower cost than the old versions. This patch removes those old versions and switches libc++ to use the new ones.
llvm-svn: 364160
When applied to a typedef or alias template, the [[nodebug]] attribute
makes the typedef transparent to the debugger, so instead of seeing
`std::__function::__alloc_func<remove_reference<void(&)()>::type,
allocator<remove_reference<void(&)()>, void()>::_Target` you see
`void(&)()` as the type of the variable in your debugger.
Removing all this SFINAE noise from debug info has huge binary size
wins, in addition to improving the readability.
For now this change is on by default. Users can override it by
specifying -D_LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE=
llvm-svn: 363117
std::function uses a standard allocator to manage its memory, however
standard allocators are templates and using them correctly requires
a stupid amount of instantiations. This leads to a substantial increase
in debug info and object sizes.
This patch addresses the issue by dropping the allocator when possible
and using raw new and delete to get memory.
This change decreases the object file size for the test func.wrap.func.con/F.pass.cpp by 33% and the final binary by 29% (when compiled with -g -ggnu-pubnames -gpubnames).
It also roughly halfs the number of entries in the pubnames and pubtype
sections.
llvm-svn: 362865
On my Windows system, __allocator is defined to nothing. This change fixes build errors of the below form:
In file included from algorithm:644:
functional(1492,31): error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
const _Alloc& __allocator() const { return __f_.second(); }
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57355
llvm-svn: 352561
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
Patch from Jordan Soyke (jsoyke@google.com)
Reviewed as D55520
This change adds a new internal class, called __value_func, that adds
a minimal subset of value-type semantics to the internal __func interface.
The change is NFC, and is cleanup for the upcoming ABI v2 function implementation (D55045).
llvm-svn: 348778
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
Be defensive against a reentrant std::function::operator=(nullptr_t), in case
the held function object has a non-trivial destructor. Destroying the function
object in-place can lead to the destructor being called twice.
Patch by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith. C++03 support by Volodymyr Sapsai.
rdar://problem/32836603
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34331
llvm-svn: 330885
Summary:
Compiling `<functional>` in C++17 or higher mode results in:
```
functional:2500:1: warning: attribute '__visibility__' is ignored, place it after "class" to apply attribute to type declaration [-Wignored-attributes]
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS
^
__config:701:46: note: expanded from macro '_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS'
# define _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS __attribute__ ((__visibility__("default")))
^
1 warning generated.
```
Fix it by putting the attribute after the `class` keyword.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43209
llvm-svn: 325027
Arthur O'Dwyer