This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
When setting the frame pointer, the offset from SP is calculated based on the
stack slot it gets allocated, but this slot is in turn based on the order of
the CSR list so that list should match the order we actually save the registers
in. Mostly it did, but in the edge-case of MachO AAPCS targets it was wrong.
llvm-svn: 269459
(re-apply r268810 as it exposed an uninitialized variable in ARM MFI.
Patch 268868 should fix that.)
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: vitalybuka, aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268869
(this is resubmit of r268529 with minor refactoring. r268529 was reverted
at r268536 due a memory sanitizer failure. I have not been able to
reproduce that failure and I checked all the variable used in my change
but I could not spot an issue. I did some refactoring and see if it will
give a clearer hint)
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: vitalybuka, aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268810
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268529
Summary:
Historically, we had a switch in the Makefiles for turning on "expensive
checks". This has never been ported to the cmake build, but the
(dead-ish) code is still around.
This will also make it easier to turn it on in buildbots.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: jyknight, mzolotukhin, RKSimon, gberry, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19723
llvm-svn: 268050
This corrects the MI annotations for the stack adjustment following the __chkstk
invocation. We were marking the original SP usage as a Def rather than Kill.
The (new) assigned value is the definition, the original reference is killed.
Adjust the ISelLowering to mark Kills and FrameSetup as well.
This partially resolves PR27480.
llvm-svn: 267361
It is very likely that the swiftself parameter is alive throughout most
functions function so putting it into a callee save register should
avoid spills for the callers with only a minimum amount of extra spills
in the callees.
Currently the generated code is correct but unnecessarily spills and
reloads arguments passed in callee save registers, I will address this
in upcoming patches.
This also adds a missing check that for tail calls the preserved value
of the caller must be the same as the callees parameter.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18901
llvm-svn: 266253
This is better for a few reasons:
+ It matches the other tooling for iOS.
+ It matches EABI in more cases (i.e. Thumb-mode, and in practice we don't
use ARM mode).
+ It leads to infinitesimally smaller code (0.2%, yay!).
rdar://25369506
llvm-svn: 266003
This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous
and/or next instruction.
It also greatly simplifies the calls to this function from Prolog-
EpilogInserter. Previously, that had a bunch of logic to resume iteration
after the call; now it just continues with the returned iterator.
Note that this changes the behaviour of PEI a little. Previously,
it attempted to re-visit the new instruction created by
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(). That code was added in r36625,
but I can't see any reason for it: the new instructions will obviously
not be pseudo instructions, they will not have FrameIndex operands,
and we have already accounted for the stack adjustment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627
llvm-svn: 265036
Change MachineInstr API to prefer MachineInstr& over MachineInstr*
whenever the parameter is expected to be non-null. Slowly inching
toward being able to fix PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262149
Summary:
This review is related to another review request http://reviews.llvm.org/D11268, does the same and merely fixes a couple of issues with it.
D11268 is quite old and has merge conflicts against the current trunk.
This request
- rebases D11268 onto the new trunk;
- resolves the merge conflicts;
- fixes the prologue_end tests, which do not pass due to the subprogram definitions not marked as distinct.
Reviewers: echristo, rengolin, kubabrecka
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits, asl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14338
llvm-svn: 252177
At the LLVM level this ABI is essentially a minimal modification of AAPCS to
support 16-byte alignment for vector types and the stack.
llvm-svn: 251570
Summary:
When ARMFrameLowering::emitPopInst generates a "pop" instruction to restore the callee saved registers, it checks if the LR register is among them. If so, the function may decide to remove the basic block's terminator and replace it with a "pop" to the PC register instead of LR.
This leads to a problem when the block's terminator is preceded by a "llvm.debugtrap" call. The MI iterator points to the trap in such a case, which is also a terminator. If the function decides to restore LR to PC, it erroneously removes the trap.
Reviewers: asl, rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, jfb, rengolin, dschuff, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13672
llvm-svn: 251123
Accept r11 when targeting Windows on ARM rather than just low registers.
Because we are in a thumb-2 only mode, this may be slightly more expensive in
code size, but results in better code for the environment since it spills the
frame register, which is generally desired for fast stack walking as per the
ABI.
llvm-svn: 249804
This time, the issue is that we weren't accounting for the possibility that
aligned DPRs could have been stored after the final "push" in a prologue. When
that happened we effectively moved a "sub sp, #N" from below the aligned stores
to above them, and everything went to pot.
To make it worse, I'd actually committed something testing that we produced
wrong code, so the test update is tiny.
llvm-svn: 248437
With subregister liveness enabled we can detect the case where only
parts of a register are live in, this is expressed as a 32bit lanemask.
The current code only keeps registers in the live-in list and therefore
enumerated all subregisters affected by the lanemask. This turned out to
be too conservative as the subregister may also cover additional parts
of the lanemask which are not live. Expressing a given lanemask by
enumerating a minimum set of subregisters is computationally expensive
so the best solution is to simply change the live-in list to store the
lanemasks as well. This will reduce memory usage for targets using
subregister liveness and slightly increase it for other targets
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12442
llvm-svn: 247171
function.
This was the same as getFrameIndexReference, but without the FrameReg
output.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12042
llvm-svn: 245148
This is the first step toward supporting shrink-wrapping for this target.
The changes could be summarized by these items:
- Expand the tail-call return as part of the expand pseudo pass.
- Get rid of the assumptions that the epilogue is the exit block:
* Do not assume which registers are free in the epilogue. (This indirectly
improve the lowering of the code for the segmented stacks, see the test
cases.)
* Take into account that the basic block can be empty.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821730>
llvm-svn: 242714
This changes TargetFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan():
- Rename the function to determineCalleeSaves()
- Pass a bitset of callee saved registers by reference, thus avoiding
the function-global PhysRegUsed bitset in MachineRegisterInfo.
- Without PhysRegUsed the implementation is fine tuned to not save
physcial registers which are only read but never modified.
Related to rdar://21539507
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
llvm-svn: 242165
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
This is part of the work to remove TargetMachine::resetTargetOptions.
In this patch, instead of updating global variable NoFramePointerElim in
resetTargetOptions, its use in DisableFramePointerElim is replaced with a call
to TargetFrameLowering::noFramePointerElim. This function determines on a
per-function basis if frame pointer elimination should be disabled.
There is no change in functionality except that cl:opt option "disable-fp-elim"
can now override function attribute "no-frame-pointer-elim".
llvm-svn: 238080
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
This makes it more likely that we can use the 16-bit push and pop instructions
on Thumb-2, saving around 4 bytes per function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9165
llvm-svn: 235637
Summary: Looks like new code from [[ http://reviews.llvm.org/rL222057 | rL222057 ]] doesn't account for early `return` in `ARMFrameLowering::emitPrologue`, which leads to loosing `.cfi_def_cfa_offset` directive for functions without stack frame.
Reviewers: echristo, rengolin, asl, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8606
llvm-svn: 234399
The main issue being fixed here is that APCS targets handling a "byval align N"
parameter with N > 4 were miscounting what objects were where on the stack,
leading to FrameLowering setting the frame pointer incorrectly and clobbering
the stack.
But byval handling had grown over many years, and had multiple layers of cruft
trying to compensate for each other and calculate padding correctly. This only
really needs to be done once, in the HandleByVal function. Elsewhere should
just do what it's told by that call.
I also stripped out unnecessary APCS/AAPCS distinctions (now that Clang emits
byvals with the correct C ABI alignment), which simplified HandleByVal.
rdar://20095672
llvm-svn: 231959
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
llvm-svn: 229220
Now that -mstack-probe-size is piped through to the backend via the function
attribute as on Windows x86, honour the value to permit handling of non-default
values for stack probes. This is needed /Gs with the clang-cl driver or
-mstack-probe-size with the clang driver when targeting Windows on ARM.
llvm-svn: 227667
This partially fixes PR13007 (ARM CodeGen fails with large stack
alignment): for ARM and Thumb2 targets, but not for Thumb1, as it
seems stack alignment for Thumb1 targets hasn't been supported at
all.
Producing an aligned stack pointer is done by zero-ing out the lower
bits of the stack pointer. The BIC instruction was used for this.
However, the immediate field of the BIC instruction only allows to
encode an immediate that can zero out up to a maximum of the 8 lower
bits. When a larger alignment is requested, a BIC instruction cannot
be used; llvm was silently producing incorrect code in this case.
This commit fixes code generation for large stack aligments by
using the BFC instruction instead, when the BFC instruction is
available. When not, it uses 2 instructions: a right shift,
followed by a left shift to zero out the lower bits.
The lowering of ARM::Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup still has code
that unconditionally uses BIC to realign the stack pointer, so it
very likely has the same problem. However, I wasn't able to
produce a test case for that. This commit adds an assert so that
the compiler will fail the assert instead of silently generating
wrong code if this is ever reached.
llvm-svn: 225446
Debug info marks the first instruction without the FrameSetup flag
as being the end of the function prologue. Any CFI instructions in the
middle of the function prologue would cause debug info to end the prologue
too early and worse, attach the line number of the CFI instruction, which
incidentally is often 0.
llvm-svn: 224294
We use to track quite a few "adjusted" offsets through the FrameLowering code
to account for changes in the prologue instructions as we went and allow the
emission of correct CFA annotations. However, we were missing a couple of cases
and the code was almost impenetrable.
It's easier to just add any stack-adjusting instruction to a list and emit them
together.
llvm-svn: 222057
When we folded the DPR alignment gap into a push, we weren't noting the extra
distance from the beginning of the push to the FP, and so FP ended up pointing
at an incorrect offset.
The .cfi_def_cfa_offset directives are still wrong in this case, but I think
that can be improved by refactoring.
llvm-svn: 222056
We currently try to push an even number of registers to preserve 8-byte
alignment during a function's prologue, but only when the stack alignment is
prcisely 8. Many of the reasons for doing it apply also when that alignment > 8
(the extra store is often free, and can save another stack adjustment, though
less frequently for 16-byte stack alignment).
llvm-svn: 221321
We were making an attempt to do this by adding an extra callee-saved GPR (so
that there was an even number in the list), but when that failed we went ahead
and pushed anyway.
This had a couple of potential issues:
+ The .cfi directives we emit misplaced dN because they were based on
PrologEpilogInserter's calculation.
+ Unaligned stores can be less efficient.
+ Unaligned stores can actually fault (likely only an issue in niche cases,
but possible).
This adds a final explicit stack adjustment if all other options fail, so that
the actual locations of the registers match up with where they should be.
llvm-svn: 221320
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
Benjamin Kramer