template-parameter-list in a lambda.
This implements one of the missing parts of P0857R0. Mark it as not done
on the cxx_status page given that it's still incomplete.
This implements the likelihood attribute for the switch statement. Based on the
discussion in D85091 and D86559 it only handles the attribute when placed on
the case labels or the default labels.
It also marks the likelihood attribute as feature complete. There are more QoI
patches in the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89210
Ensure that we evaluate assignment and compound-assignment
right-to-left, and array subscripting left-to-right.
Fixes PR47724.
This is a re-commit of ded79be, reverted in 37c74df, with a fix and test
for the crasher bug previously introduced.
This is the initial part of the implementation of the C++20 likelihood
attributes. It handles the attributes in an if statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85091
Summary:
The 'Clang 10' boxes should be green since Clang 10 has been released.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78068
Summary:
As of the 2019 Cologne meeting, according to its minutes (N4826), N4818
is the draft of the Reflection TS.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75524
Summary:
The document covers the Clang implementation status of the "upcoming
C++20 standard". Update the title to match.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75523
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.
WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).
The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
Summary:
Due to a recent (but retroactive) C++ rule change, only sufficiently
C-compatible classes are permitted to be given a typedef name for
linkage purposes. Add an enabled-by-default warning for these cases, and
rephrase our existing error for the case where we encounter the typedef
name for linkage after we've already computed and used a wrong linkage
in terms of the new rule.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74103
We don't yet advertise init capture packs, because I found some bugs
while testing it. We reject-valid and then crash on both of these:
template<int ...a> auto x = [...y = a] {};
template<int ...a> auto x = [y = a...] {};
This covers:
* usual arithmetic conversions (comparisons, arithmetic, conditionals)
between different enumeration types
* usual arithmetic conversions between enums and floating-point types
* comparisons between two operands of array type
The deprecation warnings are on-by-default (in C++20 compilations); it
seems likely that these forms will become ill-formed in C++23, so
warning on them now by default seems wise.
For the first two bullets, off-by-default warnings were also added for
all the cases where we didn't already have warnings (covering language
modes prior to C++20). These warnings are in subgroups of the existing
-Wenum-conversion (except that the first case is not warned on if either
enumeration type is anonymous, consistent with our existing
-Wenum-conversion warnings).
This adds support for rewriting <, >, <=, and >= to a normal or reversed
call to operator<=>, for rewriting != to a normal or reversed call to
operator==, and for rewriting <=> and == to reversed forms of those same
operators.
Note that this is a breaking change for various C++17 code patterns,
including some in use in LLVM. The most common patterns (where an
operator== becomes ambiguous with a reversed form of itself) are still
accepted under this patch, as an extension (with a warning). I'm hopeful
that we can get the language rules fixed before C++20 ships, and the
extension warning is aimed primarily at providing data to inform that
decision.
llvm-svn: 375306
whose value is not ignored.
We don't warn on all the cases that are deprecated: specifically, we
choose to not warn for now if there are parentheses around the
assignment but its value is not actually used. This seems like a more
defensible rule, particularly for cases like sizeof(v = a), where the
parens are part of the operand rather than the sizeof syntax.
llvm-svn: 374135
Diagnose some now-deprecated uses of volatile types:
* as function parameter types and return types
* as the type of a structured binding declaration
* as the type of the lvalue operand of an increment / decrement /
compound assignment operator
This does not implement a check for the deprecation of simple
assignments whose results are used; that check requires somewhat
more complexity and will be addressed separately.
llvm-svn: 374133
This is mostly the same as the
[[clang::require_constant_initialization]] attribute, but has a couple
of additional syntactic and semantic restrictions.
In passing, I added a warning for the attribute form being added after
we have already seen the initialization of the variable (but before we
see the definition); that case previously slipped between the cracks and
the attribute was silently ignored.
llvm-svn: 370972
As passed in the Cologne meeting and treated by Core as a DR,
[[nodiscard]] was applied to constructors so that they can be diagnosed
in cases where the user forgets a variable name for a type.
The intent is to enable the library to start using this on the
constructors of scope_guard/lock_guard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64914
llvm-svn: 367027
Richard Smith