This is the very first step toward removing the glue and clutter from linalg and
replace it with proper sparse tensor types. This revision migrates the LinalgSparseOps
into SparseTensorOps of a sparse tensor dialect. This also provides a new home for
sparse tensor related transformation.
NOTE: the actual replacement with sparse tensor types (and removal of linalg glue/clutter)
will follow but I am trying to keep the amount of changes per revision manageable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101573
This is the very first step toward removing the glue and clutter from linalg and
replace it with proper sparse tensor types. This revision migrates the LinalgSparseOps
into SparseTensorOps of a sparse tensor dialect. This also provides a new home for
sparse tensor related transformation.
NOTE: the actual replacement with sparse tensor types (and removal of linalg glue/clutter)
will follow but I am trying to keep the amount of changes per revision manageable.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101488
We will soon be adding non-AVX512 operations to MLIR, such as AVX's rsqrt. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D99818 several possibilities were discussed, namely to (1) add non-AVX512 ops to the AVX512 dialect, (2) add more dialects (e.g. AVX dialect for AVX rsqrt), and (3) expand the scope of the AVX512 to include these SIMD x86 ops, thereby renaming the dialect to something more accurate such as X86Vector.
Consensus was reached on option (3), which this patch implements.
Reviewed By: aartbik, ftynse, nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100119
The Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) provides a tile matrix
multiply unit (TMUL), a tile control register (TILECFG), and eight
tile registers TMM0 through TMM7 (TILEDATA). This new MLIR dialect
provides a bridge between MLIR concepts like vectors and memrefs
and the lower level LLVM IR details of AMX.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98470
Data layout information allows to answer questions about the size and alignment
properties of a type. It enables, among others, the generation of various
linear memory addressing schemes for containers of abstract types and deeper
reasoning about vectors. This introduces the subsystem for modeling data
layouts in MLIR.
The data layout subsystem is designed to scale to MLIR's open type and
operation system. At the top level, it consists of attribute interfaces that
can be implemented by concrete data layout specifications; type interfaces that
should be implemented by types subject to data layout; operation interfaces
that must be implemented by operations that can serve as data layout scopes
(e.g., modules); and dialect interfaces for data layout properties unrelated to
specific types. Built-in types are handled specially to decrease the overall
query cost.
A concrete default implementation of these interfaces is provided in the new
Target dialect. Defaults for built-in types that match the current behavior are
also provided.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97067
Extracts the relevant dimensions from the map under test to build up the
maps to test against in a permutation-invariant way.
This also includes a fix to the indexing maps used by
isColumnMajorMatmul. The maps as currently written do not describe a
column-major matmul. The linalg named op column_major_matmul has the
correct maps (and notably fails the current test).
If `C = matmul(A, B)` we want an operation that given A in column major
format and B in column major format produces C in column major format.
Given that for a matrix, faux column major is just transpose.
`column_major_matmul(transpose(A), transpose(B)) = transpose(C)`. If
`A` is `NxK` and `B` is `KxM`, then `C` is `NxM`, so `transpose(A)` is
`KxN`, `transpose(B)` is `MxK` and `transpose(C)` is `MxN`, not `NxM`
as these maps currently have.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96984
This commit introduced a cyclic dependency:
Memref dialect depends on Standard because it used ConstantIndexOp.
Std depends on the MemRef dialect in its EDSC/Intrinsics.h
Working on a fix.
This reverts commit 8aa6c3765b.
Create the memref dialect and move several dialect-specific ops without
dependencies to other ops from std dialect to this dialect.
Moved ops:
AllocOp -> MemRef_AllocOp
AllocaOp -> MemRef_AllocaOp
DeallocOp -> MemRef_DeallocOp
MemRefCastOp -> MemRef_CastOp
GetGlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GetGlobalOp
GlobalMemRefOp -> MemRef_GlobalOp
PrefetchOp -> MemRef_PrefetchOp
ReshapeOp -> MemRef_ReshapeOp
StoreOp -> MemRef_StoreOp
TransposeOp -> MemRef_TransposeOp
ViewOp -> MemRef_ViewOp
The roadmap to split the memref dialect from std is discussed here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-memref-dialect-from-std/2667
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96425
This reverts commit 0d48d265db.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
The PDL Interpreter dialect provides a lower level abstraction compared to the PDL dialect, and is targeted towards low level optimization and interpreter code generation. The dialect operations encapsulates low-level pattern match and rewrite "primitives", such as navigating the IR (Operation::getOperand), creating new operations (OpBuilder::create), etc. Many of the operations within this dialect also fuse branching control flow with some form of a predicate comparison operation. This type of fusion reduces the amount of work that an interpreter must do when executing.
An example of this representation is shown below:
```mlir
// The following high level PDL pattern:
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite %root {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}
// May be represented in the interpreter dialect as follows:
module {
func @matcher(%arg0: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.check_operation_name of %arg0 is "foo.op" -> ^bb2, ^bb1
^bb1:
pdl_interp.return
^bb2:
pdl_interp.check_operand_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb3, ^bb1
^bb3:
pdl_interp.check_result_count of %arg0 is 1 -> ^bb4, ^bb1
^bb4:
%0 = pdl_interp.get_operand 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %0 : !pdl.value -> ^bb5, ^bb1
^bb5:
%1 = pdl_interp.get_result 0 of %arg0
pdl_interp.is_not_null %1 : !pdl.value -> ^bb6, ^bb1
^bb6:
pdl_interp.record_match @rewriters::@rewriter(%0, %arg0 : !pdl.value, !pdl.operation) : benefit(1), loc([%arg0]), root("foo.op") -> ^bb1
}
module @rewriters {
func @rewriter(%arg0: !pdl.value, %arg1: !pdl.operation) {
pdl_interp.replace %arg1 with(%arg0)
pdl_interp.return
}
}
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84579
PDL presents a high level abstraction for the rewrite pattern infrastructure available in MLIR. This abstraction allows for representing patterns transforming MLIR, as MLIR. This allows for applying all of the benefits that the general MLIR infrastructure provides, to the infrastructure itself. This means that pattern matching can be more easily verified for correctness, targeted by frontends, and optimized.
PDL abstracts over various different aspects of patterns and core MLIR data structures. Patterns are specified via a `pdl.pattern` operation. These operations contain a region body for the "matcher" code, and terminate with a `pdl.rewrite` that either dispatches to an external rewriter or contains a region for the rewrite specified via `pdl`. The types of values in `pdl` are handle types to MLIR C++ types, with `!pdl.attribute`, `!pdl.operation`, and `!pdl.type` directly mapping to `mlir::Attribute`, `mlir::Operation*`, and `mlir::Value` respectively.
An example pattern is shown below:
```mlir
// pdl.pattern contains metadata similarly to a `RewritePattern`.
pdl.pattern : benefit(1) {
// External input operand values are specified via `pdl.input` operations.
// Result types are constrainted via `pdl.type` operations.
%resultType = pdl.type
%inputOperand = pdl.input
%root, %results = pdl.operation "foo.op"(%inputOperand) -> %resultType
pdl.rewrite(%root) {
pdl.replace %root with (%inputOperand)
}
}
```
This is a culmination of the work originally discussed here: https://groups.google.com/a/tensorflow.org/g/mlir/c/j_bn74ByxlQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84578
This dialect contains various structured control flow operaitons, not only
loops, reflect this in the name. Drop the Ops suffix for consistency with other
dialects.
Note that this only moves the files and changes the C++ namespace from 'loop'
to 'scf'. The visible IR prefix remains the same and will be updated
separately. The conversions will also be updated separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79578
Summary:
* Removal of FxpMathOps was discussed on the mailing list.
* Will send a courtesy note about also removing the Quantizer (which had some dependencies on FxpMathOps).
* These were only ever used for experimental purposes and we know how to get them back from history as needed.
* There is a new proposal for more generalized quantization tooling, so moving these older experiments out of the way helps clean things up.
Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77479
Summary:
Change AffineOps Dialect structure to better group both IR and Tranforms. This included extracting transforms directly related to AffineOps. Also move AffineOps to Affine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76161
The Vector Dialect [document](https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/Vector/) discusses the vector abstractions that MLIR supports and the various tradeoffs involved.
One of the layer that is missing in OSS atm is the Hardware Vector Ops (HWV) level.
This revision proposes an AVX512-specific to add a new Dialect/Targets/AVX512 Dialect that would directly target AVX512-specific intrinsics.
Atm, we rely too much on LLVM’s peephole optimizer to do a good job from small insertelement/extractelement/shufflevector. In the future, when possible, generic abstractions such as VP intrinsics should be preferred.
The revision will allow trading off HW-specific vs generic abstractions in MLIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75987
Summary:
Renamed QuantOps to Quant to avoid the Ops suffix. All dialects will contain
ops, so the Ops suffix is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76318
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
In the previous state, we were relying on forcing the linker to include
all libraries in the final binary and the global initializer to self-register
every piece of the system. This change help moving away from this model, and
allow users to compose pieces more freely. The current change is only "fixing"
the dialect registration and avoiding relying on "whole link" for the passes.
The translation is still relying on the global registry, and some refactoring
is needed to make this all more convenient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74461
Summary:
Barrier is a simple operation that takes no arguments and returns
nothing, but implies a side effect (synchronization of all threads)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, guansong, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72400
Aart Bik