to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Removed the uses of the allOf() matcher inside node matchers that are implicit
allOf(). Replaced uses of allOf() with the explicit node matcher where it makes
matchers more readable. Replace anyOf(hasName(), hasName(), ...) with the more
efficient and readable hasAnyName().
llvm-svn: 347520
Summary:
For example:
```
namespace util { class Base; }
namespace new {
namespace util { class Internal; }
}
namespace old {
util::Base b1;
}
```
When changing `old::` to `new::`, `util::` in namespace "new::" will conflict
with "new::util::" unless a leading "::" is added.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53489
llvm-svn: 344897
Summary:
Previously, the matcher matches a function call/ref multiple times, one
for each decl ancestor. This might cause problems. For example, in the following
case, `func()` would be matched once (with namespace context) before using decl is
seen and once after using decl is seeing, which would result in different conflicting
replacements as the first match would replace `func` with "ns::func" as it doesn't
know about the using decl.
```
namespace x {
namespace {
using ::ns::func;
void f() { func(); }
}
}
```
Switching from `hasDescendant` matching to `hasAncestor` matching solves the
problem.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44517
llvm-svn: 327629
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
Summary:
When changing namespaces, the tool adds leading "::" to references that need to
be fully-qualified, which would affect readability.
We avoid adding "::" when the symbol name does not conflict with the new
namespace name. For example, a symbol name "na::nb::X" conflicts with "ns::na"
since it would be resolved to "ns::na::nb::X" in the new namespace.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30493
llvm-svn: 298363
Summary:
Previously, the insertion points would conflict with the old namespace
deletion.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30490
llvm-svn: 296604
Summary:
This fixes mismatch between template decls and template specialization decls.
Also added a few more test cases.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29447
llvm-svn: 293897
Summary:
For example, when we change 'na' to "nb::nc", we need to add leading '::' to
references "::nc::X" in the changed namespace.
Reviewers: bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29176
llvm-svn: 293182
Summary: Previously, a `\n` might be left in the old namespace and thus not copied to the new namespace, which is bad.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: alexshap, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28282
llvm-svn: 290966
Summary: Also make sure one function reference is only processed once.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27982
llvm-svn: 290176
Summary: This fixes templated type aliases and templated type aliases in classes.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27801
llvm-svn: 289799
Summary:
Using shadow declarations in classes always refers to base class, which does not
need to be fixed/qualified since it can be inferred from inheritance.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27523
llvm-svn: 288919
Summary:
Forward declarations in moved namespaces should be moved back to the old
namespaces. We should also move template class forward declarations.
Also fix a bug that moves forward declarations of nested classes.
Reviewers: bkramer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27515
llvm-svn: 288908
Summary:
namespace nx { namespace ny { class Base { public: Base(i) {}} } }
namespace na {
namespace nb {
class X : public nx::ny {
public:
X() : Base::Base(1) {}
};
}
}
When changing from na::nb to x::y, "Base::Base" will be changed to "nx::ny::Base" and
"Base::" in "Base::Base" will be replaced with "nx::ny::Base" too, which causes
conflict. This conflict should've been detected when adding replacements but was hidden by `addOrMergeReplacement`. We now also detect conflict when adding replacements where conflict must not happen.
The namespace lookup is tricky here, we simply replace "Base::Base()" with "nx::ny::Base()" as a workaround, which compiles but not perfect.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: bkramer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26637
llvm-svn: 287118
Summary: If a TypeLoc refers to a type alias defined in the moved namespace, we do not need to update its specifier since the type alias decl will be moved along with the type reference.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26592
llvm-svn: 286873
Summary:
when replacing symbol references in moved namespaces, trying to make the replace
name as short as possible by considering UsingDecl (i.e. UsingShadow) and
UsingDirectiveDecl (i.e. using namespace decl).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25771
llvm-svn: 286307
Chandler Carruth