This error was found when analyzing MySQL with CTU enabled.
When there are space characters in the lookup name, the current
delimiter searching strategy will make the file path wrongly parsed.
And when two lookup names have the same prefix before their first space
characters, a 'multiple definitions' error will be wrongly reported.
e.g. The lookup names for the two lambda exprs in the test case are
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator int (*)(char)#1` and
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator bool (*)(char)#1` respectively. And their
prefixes are both `c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator` when using the first space
character as the delimiter.
Solving the problem by adding a length for the lookup name, making the
index items in the format of `<USR-Length>:<USR File> <Path>`.
---
In the test case of this patch, we found that it will trigger a "triple
mismatch" warning when using `clang -cc1` to analyze the source file
with CTU using the on-demand-parsing strategy in Darwin systems. And
this problem is also encountered in D75665, which is the patch
introducing the on-demand parsing strategy.
We temporarily bypass this problem by using the loading-ast-file
strategy.
Refer to the [discourse topic](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/60762) for
more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102669
This error was found when analyzing MySQL with CTU enabled.
When there are space characters in the lookup name, the current
delimiter searching strategy will make the file path wrongly parsed.
And when two lookup names have the same prefix before their first space
characters, a 'multiple definitions' error will be wrongly reported.
e.g. The lookup names for the two lambda exprs in the test case are
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator int (*)(char)#1` and
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator bool (*)(char)#1` respectively. And their
prefixes are both `c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator` when using the first space
character as the delimiter.
Solving the problem by adding a length for the lookup name, making the
index items in the format of `USR-Length:USR File-Path`.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102669
Removes `CrossTranslationUnitContext::getImportedFromSourceLocation`
Removes the corresponding unit-test segment.
Introduces the `CrossTranslationUnitContext::getMacroExpansionContextForSourceLocation`
which will return the macro expansion context for an imported TU. Also adds a
few implementation FIXME notes where applicable, since this feature is
not implemented yet. This fact is also noted as Doxygen comments.
Uplifts a few CTU LIT test to match the current **incomplete** behavior.
It is a regression to some extent since now we don't expand any
macros in imported TUs. At least we don't crash anymore.
Note that the introduced function is already covered by LIT tests.
Eg.: Analysis/plist-macros-with-expansion-ctu.c
Reviewed By: balazske, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94673
Summary:
The default CTUImportThreshold (8) seems to be too conservative with C projects.
We increase this value to 24 and we introduce another threshold for C++ source
files (defaulted to 8) because their AST is way more compilcated than C source
files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83475
Summary:
Parent map of ASTContext is built once. If this happens and later
the TU is modified by getCrossTUDefinition the parent map does not
contain the newly imported objects and has to be re-created.
Invalidation of the parent map is added to the CrossTranslationUnitContext.
It could be added to ASTImporter as well but for now this task remains the
responsibility of the user of ASTImporter. Reason for this is mostly that
ASTImporter calls itself recursively.
Reviewers: gamesh411, martong
Reviewed By: gamesh411
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82568
Summary:
Add an option to enable on-demand parsing of needed ASTs during CTU analysis.
Two options are introduced. CTUOnDemandParsing enables the feature, and
CTUOnDemandParsingDatabase specifies the path to a compilation database, which
has all the necessary information to generate the ASTs.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, Szelethus, xazax.hun
Subscribers: ormris, mgorny, whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, steakhal, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75665
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
A new function will be added to get the original SourceLocation
for a SourceLocation that was imported as result of getCrossTUDefinition.
The returned SourceLocation is in the context of the (original)
SourceManager for the original source file. Additionally the
ASTUnit object for that source file is returned. This is needed
to get a SourceManager to operate on with the returned source location.
The new function works if multiple different source files are loaded
with the same CrossTU context.
Reviewers: martong, shafik
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65064
llvm-svn: 366884
Reason: the commit breaks layering by adding a dependency on ASTUnit
(which is inside clangFrontend) from the ASTImporter (which is inside
clangAST).
llvm-svn: 366453
Summary:
A new function will be added to get the original SourceLocation
for a SourceLocation that was imported as result of getCrossTUDefinition.
The returned SourceLocation is in the context of the (original)
SourceManager for the original source file. Additionally the
ASTUnit object for that source file is returned. This is needed
to get a SourceManager to operate on with the returned source location.
The new function works if multiple different source files are loaded
with the same CrossTU context.
This patch can be treated as part of a bigger change that is needed to
improve macro expansion handliong at plist generation.
Reviewers: martong, shafik, a_sidorin, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64554
llvm-svn: 366449
Summary:
During CTU analysis of complex projects, the loaded AST-contents of
imported TUs can grow bigger than available system memory. This option
introduces a threshold on the number of TUs to be imported for a single
TU in order to prevent such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59798
llvm-svn: 365314
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is a more thorough fix of rC348911.
The story about -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on build after rC348907 (Move PCHContainerOperations from Frontend to Serialization) is:
1. libclangSerialization.so defines PCHContainerReader dtor, ...
2. clangFrontend and clangTooling define classes inheriting from PCHContainerReader, thus their DSOs have undefined references on PCHContainerReader dtor
3. Components depending on either clangFrontend or clangTooling cannot be linked unless they have explicit dependency on clangSerialization due to the default linker option -z defs. The explicit dependency could be avoided if libclang{Frontend,Tooling}.so had these undefined references.
This patch adds the explicit dependency on clangSerialization to make them build.
llvm-svn: 348915
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779
llvm-svn: 326201
We currently use target_link_libraries without an explicit scope
specifier (INTERFACE, PRIVATE or PUBLIC) when linking executables.
Dependencies added in this way apply to both the target and its
dependencies, i.e. they become part of the executable's link interface
and are transitive.
Transitive dependencies generally don't make sense for executables,
since you wouldn't normally be linking against an executable. This also
causes issues for generating install export files when using
LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS. For example, clang has a lot of LLVM
library dependencies, which are currently added as interface
dependencies. If clang is in the distribution components but the LLVM
libraries it depends on aren't (which is a perfectly legitimate use case
if the LLVM libraries are being built static and there are therefore no
run-time dependencies on them), CMake will complain about the LLVM
libraries not being in export set when attempting to generate the
install export file for clang. This is reasonable behavior on CMake's
part, and the right thing is for LLVM's build system to explicitly use
PRIVATE dependencies for executables.
Unfortunately, CMake doesn't allow you to mix and match the keyword and
non-keyword target_link_libraries signatures for a single target; i.e.,
if a single call to target_link_libraries for a particular target uses
one of the INTERFACE, PRIVATE, or PUBLIC keywords, all other calls must
also be updated to use those keywords. This means we must do this change
in a single shot. I also fully expect to have missed some instances; I
tested by enabling all the projects in the monorepo (except dragonegg),
and configuring both with and without shared libraries, on both Darwin
and Linux, but I'm planning to rely on the buildbots for other
configurations (since it should be pretty easy to fix those).
Even after this change, we still have a lot of target_link_libraries
calls that don't specify a scope keyword, mostly for shared libraries.
I'm thinking about addressing those in a follow-up, but that's a
separate change IMO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40823
llvm-svn: 319840
This patch introduces a class that can help to build tools that require cross
translation unit facilities. This class allows function definitions to be loaded
from external AST files based on an index. In order to use this functionality an
index is required. The index format is a flat text file but it might be
replaced with a different solution in the near future. USRs are used as names to
look up the functions definitions. This class also does caching to avoid
redundant loading of AST files.
Right now only function defnitions can be loaded using this API because this is
what the in progress cross translation unit feature of the Static Analyzer
requires. In to future this might be extended to classes, types etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34512
llvm-svn: 313975
Ella Ma