This is an improved version of r186498. It enables ExprEngine to reason about
temporary object destructors. However, these destructor calls are never
inlined, since this feature is still broken. Still, this is sufficient to
properly handle noreturn temporary destructors.
Now, the analyzer correctly handles expressions like "a || A()", and executes the
destructor of "A" only on the paths where "a" evaluted to false.
Temporary destructor processing is still off by default and one has to
explicitly request it by setting cfg-temporary-dtors=true.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1259
llvm-svn: 189746
The analyzer doesn't currently expect CFG blocks with terminators to be
empty, but this can happen when generating conditional destructors for
a complex logical expression, such as (a && (b || Temp{})). Moreover,
the branch conditions for these expressions are not persisted in the
state. Even for handling noreturn destructors this needs more work.
This reverts r186498.
llvm-svn: 186925
Summary:
This patch enables ExprEndgine to reason about temporary object destructors.
However, these destructor calls are never inlined, since this feature is still
broken. Still, this is sufficient to properly handle noreturn temporary
destructors and close bug #15599. I have also enabled the cfg-temporary-dtors
analyzer option by default.
Reviewers: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1131
llvm-svn: 186498
This is a more natural order of evaluation, and it is very important
for visualization in the static analyzer. Within Xcode, the arrows
will not jump from right to left, which looks very visually jarring.
It also provides a more natural location for dataflow-based diagnostics.
Along the way, we found a case in the analyzer diagnostics where we
needed to indicate that a variable was "captured" by a block.
-fsyntax-only timings on sqlite3.c show no visible performance change,
although this is just one test case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13016513>
llvm-svn: 174447
This is a (heavy-handed) solution to PR13724 -- until we know we can do
a good job inlining the STL, it's best to be consistent and not generate
more false positives than we did before. We can selectively whitelist
certain parts of the 'std' namespace that are known to be safe.
This is controlled by analyzer config option 'c++-stdlib-inlining', which
can be set to "true" or "false".
This commit also adds control for whether or not to inline any templated
functions (member or non-member), under the config option
'c++-template-inlining'. This option is currently on by default.
llvm-svn: 163548
While destructors will continue to not be inlined (unless the analyzer
config option 'c++-inlining' is set to 'destructors'), leaving them out
of the CFG is an incomplete model of the behavior of an object, and
can cause false positive warnings (like PR13751, now working).
Destructors for temporaries are still not on by default, since
(a) we haven't actually checked this code to be sure it's fully correct
(in particular, we probably need to be very careful with regard to
lifetime-extension when a temporary is bound to a reference,
C++11 [class.temporary]p5), and
(b) ExprEngine doesn't actually do anything when it sees a temporary
destructor in the CFG -- not even invalidate the object region.
To enable temporary destructors, set the 'cfg-temporary-dtors' analyzer
config option to '1'. The old -cfg-add-implicit-dtors cc1 option, which
controlled all implicit destructors, has been removed.
llvm-svn: 163264
instead push the terminator for the branch down into the basic blocks of the subexpressions of '&&' and '||'
respectively. This eliminates some artifical control-flow from the CFG and results in a more
compact CFG.
Note that this patch only alters the branches 'while', 'if' and 'for'. This was complex enough for
one patch. The remaining branches (e.g., do...while) can be handled in a separate patch, but they
weren't immediately tackled because they were less important.
It is possible that this patch introduces some subtle bugs, particularly w.r.t. to destructor placement.
I've tried to audit these changes, but it is also known that the destructor logic needs some refinement
in the area of '||' and '&&' regardless (i.e., their are known bugs).
llvm-svn: 160218
The motivation of this large change is to drastically simplify the logic in ExprEngine going forward.
Some fallout is that the output of some BugReporterVisitors is not as accurate as before; those will
need to be fixed over time. There is also some possible performance regression as RemoveDeadBindings
will be called frequently; this can also be improved over time.
llvm-svn: 136419
The relative checker package is 'debug':
'-dump-live-variables' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.DumpLiveVars'
'-cfg-view' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.ViewCFG'
'-cfg-dump' is replaced by '-analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG'
llvm-svn: 125780
class and to bind the shared value using OpaqueValueExpr. This fixes an
unnoticed problem with deserialization of these expressions where the
deserialized form would lose the vital pointer-equality trait; or rather,
it fixes it because this patch also does the right thing for deserializing
OVEs.
Change OVEs to not be a "temporary object" in the sense that copy elision is
permitted.
This new representation is not totally unawkward to work with, but I think
that's really part and parcel with the semantics we're modelling here. In
particular, it's much easier to fix things like the copy elision bug and to
make the CFG look right.
I've tried to update the analyzer to deal with this in at least some
obvious cases, and I think we get a much better CFG out, but the printing
of OpaqueValueExprs probably needs some work.
llvm-svn: 125744
Elidable CXXConstructExpr should inhibit calling destructor for temporary
that is copied, not the one created. This is because eliding copy constructor
means that the object that was to be copied will be constructed directly in
memory the copy would be constructed in.
llvm-svn: 119044
1. For statement: const C& c = C(0) ?: C(1) destructors generated for condition will not differ from those generated for case without prolonged lifetime of temporary,
2. There will be no destructor for constant reference member bound to temporary at the exit from constructor.
llvm-svn: 118158
Pavel Labath