'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
UBSAN 'invalid value' failures
The commit r300556 introduced a UBSAN issue that was caught by
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap. The DenseMap
failed to create an empty/tombstone value as the empty/tombstone values for the
SubjectMatchRule enum were not valid enum constants.
llvm-svn: 300591
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
This patch serializes the state of #pragma pack. It preserves the state of the
pragma from a PCH/from modules in a file that uses that PCH/those modules.
rdar://21359084
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31241
llvm-svn: 299226
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
---
This is a recommit of r299027 with an adjustment to the test
CodeGenCUDA/fp-contract.cu. The test assumed that even
though -ffp-contract=on is passed FE-based folding of FMA won't happen.
This is obviously wrong since the user is asking for this explicitly with the
option. CUDA is different that -ffp-contract=fast is on by default.
The test used to "work" because contract=fast and contract=on were maintained
separately and we didn't fold in the FE because contract=fast was on due to
the target-default. This patch consolidates the contract=on/fast/off state
into a ternary state hence the change in behavior.
---
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299033
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299027
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
In r268085 "[MS] Make #pragma pack use PragmaStack<> class." there was an
uninitialized variable 'Alignment', which caused the following failure:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-ppc64be-linux/builds/1758
Zero-initialize the variable to fix this failure.
llvm-svn: 268129
Make implementation of #pragma pack consistent with other "stack" pragmas.
Use PragmaStack<> class instead of old representation of internal stack.
Don't change compiler's behavior.
TODO:
1. Introduce diagnostics on popping named slots from pragma stacks.
Reviewer: rnk
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19727
llvm-svn: 268085
Slightly updated version, double-checked build and tests.
Improve implementation of MS pragmas that use stack + compatibility fixes.
This patch:
1. Changes implementation of #pragma vtordisp to use PragmaStack class
that other stack pragmas use;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior - it shouldn't affect the stack;
3. Supports "save-restore" of pragma stacks on enter / exit a C++ method
body, as MSVC does.
TODO:
1. Change implementation of #pragma pack to use the same approach;
2. Introduce diagnostics on popping named stack slots, as MSVC does.
Reviewers:
rnk, thakis
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19361
llvm-svn: 268029
Rework implementation of several MS pragmas that use internal stack:
vtordisp, {bss|code|const|data}_seg.
This patch:
1. Makes #pragma vtordisp use PragmaStack class as *_seg pragmas do;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior: it shouldn't affect stack;
3. Saves/restores the stacks on enter/exit a C++ method body.
llvm-svn: 267866
This is like r262493, but for pragma detect_mismatch instead of pragma comment.
The two pragmas have similar behavior, so use the same approach for both.
llvm-svn: 262506
`#pragma comment` was handled by Sema calling a function on ASTConsumer, and
CodeGen then implementing this function and writing things to its output.
Instead, introduce a PragmaCommentDecl AST node and hang one off the
TranslationUnitDecl for every `#pragma comment` line, and then use the regular
serialization machinery. (Since PragmaCommentDecl has codegen relevance, it's
eagerly deserialized.)
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17799
llvm-svn: 262493
This is part of a new statistics gathering feature for the sanitizers.
See clang/docs/SanitizerStats.rst for further info and docs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16175
llvm-svn: 257971
They cannot be written to, so marking them const makes sense and may improve
optimisation.
As a side-effect, SectionInfos has to be moved from Sema to ASTContext.
It also fixes this problem, that occurs when compiling ATL:
warning LNK4254: section 'ATL' (C0000040) merged into '.rdata' (40000040) with different attributes
The ATL headers are putting variables in a special section that's marked
read-only. However, Clang currently can't model that read-onlyness in the IR.
But, by making the variables const, the section does become read-only, and
the linker warning is avoided.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5812
llvm-svn: 219960
Test Plan: I noticed this through code inspection. The callers use the return value to remove the SectionAttr if a diagnostic is emitted, but I don't think the failure to do so is observable right now.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5438
llvm-svn: 218265
Summary:
This pragma is very rare. We could *hypothetically* lower some uses of
it down to @llvm.global_ctors, but given that GlobalOpt isn't able to
optimize prioritized global ctors today, there's really no point.
If we wanted to do this in the future, I would check if the section used
in the pragma started with ".CRT$XC" and had up to two characters after
it. Those two characters could form the 16-bit initialization priority
that we support in @llvm.global_ctors. We would have to teach LLVM to
lower prioritized global ctors on COFF as well.
This should let us compile some silly uses of this pragma in WebKit /
Blink.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4549
llvm-svn: 213593
This patch implements support for selectively disabling optimizations on a
range of function definitions through a pragma. The implementation is that
all function definitions in the range are decorated with attribute
'optnone'.
#pragma clang optimize off
// All function definitions in here are decorated with 'optnone'.
#pragma clang optimize on
// Compilation resumes as normal.
llvm-svn: 209510
This patch adds support for the msvc pragmas section, bss_seg, code_seg,
const_seg and data_seg as well as support for __declspec(allocate()).
Additionally it corrects semantics and adds diagnostics for
__attribute__((section())) and the interaction between the attribute
and the msvc pragmas and declspec. In general conflicts should now be
well diganosed within and among these features.
In supporting the pragmas new machinery for uniform lexing for
msvc pragmas was introduced. The new machinery always lexes the
entire pragma and stores it on an annotation token. The parser
is responsible for parsing the pragma when the handling the
annotation token.
There is a known outstanding bug in this implementation in C mode.
Because these attributes and pragmas apply _only_ to definitions, we
process them at the time we detect a definition. Due to tentative
definitions in C, we end up processing the definition late. This means
that in C mode, everything that ends up in a BSS section will end up in
the _last_ BSS section rather than the one that was live at the time of
tentative definition, even if that turns out to be the point of actual
definition. This issue is not known to impact anything as of yet
because we are not aware of a clear use or use case for #pragma bss_seg
but should be fixed at some point.
Differential Revision=http://reviews.llvm.org/D3065#inline-16241
llvm-svn: 205810
These features are new in VS 2013 and are necessary in order to layout
std::ostream correctly. Currently we have an ABI incompatibility when
self-hosting with the 2013 stdlib in our convertible_fwd_ostream wrapper
in gtest.
This change adds another implicit attribute, MSVtorDispAttr, because
implicit attributes are currently the best way to make sure the
information stays on class templates through instantiation.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2746
llvm-svn: 201274
These flags control the inheritance model initially used by the
translation unit.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2741
llvm-svn: 201175
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
llvm-svn: 201105
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
Alex Lorenz