Currently we use SIGN_EXTEND in lowerMasksToReg as part of calling convention setup, but we don't require a specific value for the upper bits.
This patch changes it to ANY_EXTEND which will be lowered as SIGN_EXTEND if it ends up sticking around.
llvm-svn: 321746
Previously the code for handling G_SMULO didn't properly check for the signed
multiply overflow, instead treating it the same as the unsigned G_UMULO.
Fixes PR35800.
llvm-svn: 321690
I have no clue how this was missed when symbol table support was added. This
change ensures that the visibility of symbols is preserved by default.
llvm-svn: 321681
A call may have an intrinsic name but not have a valid intrinsic ID,
for example with llvm.invariant.group.barrier. If so, treat it as a
normal call like FastISel does.
llvm-svn: 321662
This is an extension of D31156 with the goal that we'll allow memcmp() == 0 expansion
for x86 to use 2 pairs of loads per block.
The memcmp expansion pass (formerly part of CGP) will generate this kind of pattern
with oversized integer compares, so we want to transform these into x86-specific vector
nodes before legalization splits things into scalar chunks.
See PR33325 for more details:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33325
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41618
llvm-svn: 321656
Tests updated to explicitly use fast-isel at -O0 instead of implicitly.
This change also allows an explicit -fast-isel option to override an
implicitly enabled global-isel. Otherwise -fast-isel would have no effect at -O0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41362
llvm-svn: 321655
Summary:
We are incorrectly updating the LI when loop-simplify generates
dedicated exit blocks for a loop. The issue is that there's an implicit
assumption that the Preds passed into UpdateAnalysisInformation are
reachable. However, this is not true and breaks LI by incorrectly
updating the header of a loop.
One such case is when we generate dedicated exits when the exit block is
a landing pad (through SplitLandingPadPredecessors). There maybe other
cases as well, since we do not guarantee that Preds passed in are
reachable basic blocks.
The added test case shows how loop-simplify breaks LI for the outer loop (and DT in turn)
after we try to generate the LoopSimplifyForm.
Reviewers: davide, chandlerc, sanjoy
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41519
llvm-svn: 321653
Our internal testing has revealed has discovered bugs in PPC builds.
I have forward reproduction instructions to the original author (Nirav).
llvm-svn: 321649
We can use zmm move with zero masking for this. We already had patterns for using a masked move, but we didn't check for the zero masking case separately.
llvm-svn: 321612
The CONCAT_VECTORS will be lowered to INSERT_SUBVECTOR later. In the modified cases this seems to be enough to trick a later DAG combine into running in a different order than allows the ANDs to be removed.
I'll admit this is a bit of a hack that happens to work, but using CONCAT_VECTORS is more consistent with other legalization code anyway.
llvm-svn: 321611
Don't combine buildvector(binop(),binop(),binop(),binop()) -> binop(buildvector(), buildvector()) if its a splat - keep the binop scalar and just splat the result to avoid large vector constants.
llvm-svn: 321607
Previously llvm-mc would silently accept code from testcase,
that contains invalid metadata symbol in section declaration.
Patch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41641
llvm-svn: 321599
We end up using an i8 load via an isel pattern from v8i1 anyway. This just makes it more explicit. This seems to improve codgen in some cases and I'd like to kill off some of the load patterns.
llvm-svn: 321598
The test needs to be changed; it was exercising UB and that likely wasn't the intent of the test author. I simply removed the checks because I have absolutely no idea what this test was trying to accomplish. With multiple check patterns, no explanation, and no familiarity on my part with the ISA a true fix is going to have to come from someone familiar with the target.
llvm-svn: 321591
The test in question was checking for a particular intepretation of undefined behavior. Relax the test to check that we simply don't crash.
Sorry for the breakage, I don't generally build AMDGPU locally and just saw the failure this morning.
llvm-svn: 321589
If the callee and caller use different calling convensions, we cannot apply TCO if the callee requires arguments on stack; e.g. C calling convention and Fast CC use the same registers for parameter passing, but the stack offset is not necessarily same.
This patch also recommit r319218 "[PowerPC] Allow tail calls of fastcc functions from C CallingConv functions." by @sfertile since the problem reported in r320106 should be fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40893
llvm-svn: 321579
In one case, we were handling out of bounds, but not undef indices. In the other, we were handling undef (with the comment making the analogy to out of bounds), but not out of bounds. Be consistent and treat both undef and constant out of bounds indices as producing undefined results.
As a side effect, this also protects instcombine from having to handle large constant indices as we always simplify first.
llvm-svn: 321575
Went to reduce another fuzzer failure to find it's already been fixed, but the test case is slightly different so it's worth adding anyways.
Reduced from oss-fuzz #4768 test case
llvm-svn: 321573
Simon Pilgrim