For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Much like ValueTypeByHwMode/RegInfoByHwMode, this patch allows targets
to modify an instruction's encoding based on HwMode. When the
EncodingInfos field is non-empty the Inst and Size fields of the Instruction
are ignored and taken from EncodingInfos instead.
As part of this promote getHwMode() from TargetSubtargetInfo to MCSubtargetInfo.
This is NFC for all existing targets - new code is generated only if targets
use EncodingByHwMode.
llvm-svn: 372320
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary:
The problem:
When an operand had bits explicitly set to "1" (as in the InitValue.td test case attached), the decoder was ignoring those bits, and the DecoderMethod was receiving an input where the bits were still zero.
The solution:
We added an "InitValue" variable that stores the initial value of the operand based on what bits were explicitly initialized to 1 in TableGen code. The generated decoder code then uses that initial value to initialize the "tmp" variable, then calls fieldFromInstruction to read the values for the remaining bits that were left unknown in TableGen.
This is mainly useful when there are variations of an instruction that differ based on what bits are set in the operands, since this change makes it possible to access those bits in a DecoderMethod. The DecoderMethod can use those bits to know how to handle the input.
Patch by Nicolas Guillemot
Reviewers: craig.topper, dsanders, fhahn
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63741
llvm-svn: 368458
It seems macOS lets you have ArrayRef<const X> even though this is apparently
forbidden by the language standard (Thanks MSVC++ for the clear error message).
Removed the problematic const's to fix this.
(It also seems I'm not receiving buildbot emails anymore and I'm trying to find
out why. In the mean time I'll be polling lab.llvm.org to hopefully see if/when
failures occur)
llvm-svn: 363753
Summary:
Add an AdditionalEncoding class which can be used to define additional encodings
for a given instruction. This causes the disassembler to add an additional
encoding to its matching tables that map to the specified instruction.
Usage:
def ADD1 : Instruction {
bits<8> Reg;
bits<32> Inst;
let Size = 4;
let Inst{0-7} = Reg;
let Inst{8-14} = 0;
let Inst{15} = 1; // Continuation bit
let Inst{16-31} = 0;
...
}
def : AdditionalEncoding<ADD1> {
bits<8> Reg;
bits<16> Inst; // You can also have bits<32> and it will still be a 16-bit encoding
let Size = 2;
let Inst{0-3} = 0;
let Inst{4-7} = Reg;
let Inst{8-15} = 0;
...
}
with those definitions, llvm-mc will successfully disassemble both of these:
0x01 0x00
0x10 0x80 0x00 0x00
to:
ADD1 r1
Depends on D52366
Reviewers: bogner, charukcs
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: nlguillemot, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52369
llvm-svn: 363744
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
One of the GCC based bots is objecting to a vector of const EncodingAndInst's:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/vector:64,
from /export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/llvm/utils/TableGen/CodeGenInstruction.h:22,
from /export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/llvm/utils/TableGen/FixedLenDecoderEmitter.cpp:15:
/usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h: In instantiation of 'class std::vector<const {anonymous}::EncodingAndInst, std::allocator<const {anonymous}::EncodingAndInst> >':
/export/users/atombot/llvm/clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel/llvm/utils/TableGen/FixedLenDecoderEmitter.cpp:375:32: required from here
/usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h:351:21: error: static assertion failed: std::vector must have a non-const, non-volatile value_type
static_assert(is_same<typename remove_cv<_Tp>::type, _Tp>::value,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h:354:21: error: static assertion failed: std::vector must have the same value_type as its allocator
static_assert(is_same<typename _Alloc::value_type, _Tp>::value,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
llvm-svn: 349046
Summary:
Separate the concept of an encoding from an instruction. This will enable
the definition of additional encodings for the same instruction which can
be used to support variable length instruction sets in the disassembler
(and potentially assembler but I'm not working towards that right now)
without causing an explosion in the number of Instruction records that
CodeGen then has to pick between.
Reviewers: bogner, charukcs
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: kparzysz, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52366
llvm-svn: 349041
Summary:
Some targets have very long encodings and uint64_t isn't sufficient. uint128_t
isn't portable so such targets need to use an object instead.
There is one catch with this at the moment, no string of bits extracted
from the encoding may exceeed 64-bits. Fields are still permitted to
exceed 64-bits so long as they aren't one contiguous string of bits. If
this proves to be a problem then we can modify the generation of
fieldFromInstruction() calls to account for it but for now I've added an
assertion for this.
InsnType must either be integral or an APInt-like object that must:
* Have a static const max_size_in_bits equal to the number of bits in the encoding.
* be default-constructible and copy-constructible
* be constructible from a uint64_t (this is the key area the interface deviates
from APInt since this constructor does not take the bit width)
* be constructible from an APInt (this can be private)
* be convertible to uint64_t
* Support the ~, &,, ==, !=, and |= operators with other objects of the same type
* Support shift (<<, >>) with signed and unsigned integers on the RHS
* Support put (<<) to raw_ostream&
Reviewers: bogner, charukcs
Subscribers: nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52100
llvm-svn: 345056
Summary:
The VS compiler (on Windows) has a bug which results in fieldFromInstruction being optimized out in some circumstances. This only happens in *release no debug info* builds that have assertions *turned off* - in all other situations the function is not inlined, so the functionality is correct. All of the bots have assertions turned on, so this path is not regularly tested. The workaround is to not inline the function on Windows - if the bug is fixed in a later release of the VS compiler, the noinline specification can be removed.
The test that consistently reproduces this is Lanai v11.txt test.
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Subscribers: dblaikie, stella.stamenova, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49753
llvm-svn: 337942
The vast number of added instructions for SVE causes TableGen to fail with an assertion:
Assertion `Delta < 65536U && "disassembler decoding table too large!"'
This patch increases the number of supported decoder fix-ups.
Reviewers: dmgreen, stoklund, petpav01
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48937
llvm-svn: 336334
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
The former simply makes more sense: we want to access the data here in
the backend, not information about the type.
More importantly, removing users of RecordRecTy::getRecord() allows us
more freedom to refactor the frontend.
Change-Id: Iee8905fd22cdb9b11c42ca03246c03d8fe4dd77f
llvm-svn: 326699
If a method / function returns a StringRef but the
variable is of type const std::string& a temporary string is
created (StringRef has a cast operator to std::string),
which is a suboptimal behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34994
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 307195
Summary:
SetVector already used DenseSet, but SmallSetVector used std::set. This
leads to surprising performance differences. Moreover, it means that
the set of key types accepted by SetVector and SmallSetVector are
quite different!
In order to make this change, we had to convert some callsites that used
SmallSetVector<std::string, N> to use SmallSetVector<CachedHashString, N>
instead.
Reviewers: timshen
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25648
llvm-svn: 284887
This is for a situation where the encoding for a register may be
different depending on the specific operand. For some instructions,
we want to apply additional restrictions beyond the encoding's
constraints.
In AMDGPU some operands are VSrc_32, using the VS_32 pseudo register
class which accept VGPRs, SGPRs, or immediates in the encoding.
Some specific instructions with the same encoding operand do not want
to allow immediates or SGPRs, but the encoding format is different
in this case than a regular VGPR_32 operand.
This allows specifying the encoding should be treated the same
without introducing yet another dummy register class.
llvm-svn: 275929
We use to have an odd difference among MapVector and SetVector. The map
used a DenseMop, but the set used a SmallSet, which in turn uses a
std::set.
I have changed SetVector to use a DenseSet. If you were depending on the
old behaviour you can pass an explicit set type or use SmallSetVector.
The common cases for needing to do it are:
* Optimizing for small sets.
* Sets for types not supported by DenseSet.
llvm-svn: 253439
After r244870 flush() will only compare two null pointers and return,
doing nothing but wasting run time. The call is not required any more
as the stream and its SmallString are always in sync.
Thanks to David Blaikie for reviewing.
llvm-svn: 244928
When FixedLenDecoder matches an input bitpattern of form [01]+ with an
instruction bitpattern of form [01?]+ (where 0/1 are static bits and ? are
mixed/variable bits) it passes the input bitpattern to a specific instruction
decoder method which then makes a final decision whether the bitpattern is a
valid instruction or not. This means the decoder must handle all possible
values of the variable bits which sometimes leads to opcode rewrites in the
decoder method when the instructions are not fully orthogonal.
The patch provides a way for the decoder method to say that when it returns
Fail it does not necessarily mean the bitpattern is invalid, but rather that
the bitpattern is definitely not an instruction that is recognized by the
decoder method. The decoder can then try to match the input bitpattern with
other possible instruction bitpatterns.
For example, this allows to solve a situation on AArch64 where the `MSR
(immediate)` instruction has form:
1101 0101 0000 0??? 0100 ???? ???1 1111
but not all values of the ? bits are allowed. The rejected values should be
handled by the `extended MSR (register)` instruction:
1101 0101 000? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????
The decoder will first try to decode an input bitpattern that matches both
bitpatterns as `MSR (immediate)` but currently this puts the decoder method of
`MSR (immediate)` into a situation when it must be able to decode all possible
values of the ? bits, i.e. it would need to rewrite the instruction to `MSR
(register)` when it is not `MSR (immediate)`.
The patch allows to specify that the decoder method cannot determine if the
instruction is valid for all variable values. The decoder method can simply
return Fail when it knows it is definitely not `MSR (immediate)`. The decoder
will then backtrack the decoding and find that it can match the input
bitpattern with the more generic `MSR (register)` bitpattern too.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7174
llvm-svn: 242274
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
Summary:
The loop which emits AssemblerPredicate conditions also links them together by emitting a '&&'.
If the 1st predicate is not an AssemblerPredicate, while the 2nd one is, nothing gets emitted for the 1st one, but we still emit the '&&' because of the 2nd predicate.
This generated code looks like "( && Cond2)" and is invalid.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8294
llvm-svn: 234312
Simon Cook