All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
We end up creating COPY's that are either truncating/extending and this
should be illegal.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37640
Patch for X86 and ARM by igorb, rovka
llvm-svn: 315240
Summary:
Do three things to help with that:
- Add AttributeList::FirstArgIndex, which is an enumerator currently set
to 1. It allows us to change the indexing scheme with fewer changes.
- Add addParamAttr/removeParamAttr. This just shortens addAttribute call
sites that would otherwise need to spell out FirstArgIndex.
- Remove some attribute-specific getters and setters from Function that
take attribute list indices. Most of these were only used from
BuildLibCalls, and doesNotAlias was only used to test or set if the
return value is malloc-like.
I'm happy to split the patch, but I think they are probably easier to
review when taken together.
This patch should be NFC, but it sets the stage to change the indexing
scheme to this, which is more convenient when indexing into an array:
0: func attrs
1: retattrs
2...: arg attrs
Reviewers: chandlerc, pete, javed.absar
Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32811
llvm-svn: 302060
This broke the Clang build. (Clang-side patch missing?)
Original commit message:
> [IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of
> AttributeList
>
> This change cleans up call sites and avoids creating temporary
> AttributeList objects.
>
> NFC
llvm-svn: 301712
The method is called "get *Param* Alignment", and is only used for
return values exactly once, so it should take argument indices, not
attribute indices.
Avoids confusing code like:
IsSwiftError = CS->paramHasAttr(ArgIdx, Attribute::SwiftError);
Alignment = CS->getParamAlignment(ArgIdx + 1);
Add getRetAlignment to handle the one case in Value.cpp that wants the
return value alignment.
This is a potentially breaking change for out-of-tree backends that do
their own call lowering.
llvm-svn: 301682
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention
of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle
situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from
that of the caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039
llvm-svn: 298254
For the hard float calling convention, we just use the D registers.
For the soft-fp calling convention, we use the R registers and move values
to/from the D registers by means of G_SEQUENCE/G_EXTRACT. While doing so, we
make sure to honor the endianness of the target, since the CCAssignFn doesn't do
that for us.
For pure soft float targets, we still bail out because we don't support the
libcalls yet.
llvm-svn: 295295
Well, sort of. But the lower-level code that invoke used to be using completely
botched the handling of varargs functions, which hopefully won't be possible if
they're using the same code.
llvm-svn: 293670
Some platforms (notably iOS) use a different calling convention for unnamed vs
named parameters in varargs functions, so we need to keep track of this
information when translating calls.
Since not many platforms are involved, the guts of the special handling is in
the ValueHandler class (with a generic implementation that should work for most
targets).
llvm-svn: 292283
We were rounding size in bits down rather than up, leading to 0-sized slots for
i1 (assert!) and bugs for other types not byte-aligned.
llvm-svn: 288848
This function seems target-independent so far: all the target-specific behaviour
is isolated in the CCAssignFn and the ValueHandler (which we're also extracting
into the generic CallLowering).
The intention is to use this in the ARM backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27045
llvm-svn: 288658
We still don't really have an equivalent of "AssertXExt" in DAG, so we don't
exploit the guarantees on the receiving side yet, but this should produce
conservatively correct code on iOS ABIs.
llvm-svn: 282069
This should match the existing behaviour for passing complicated struct and
array types, in particular HFAs come through like that from Clang.
For C & C++ we still need to somehow support all the weird ABI flags, or at
least those that are present in the IR (signext, byval, ...), and stack-based
parameter passing.
llvm-svn: 281977
More preparation for dropping source types from MachineInstrs: regsters coming
out of already-selected code (i.e. non-generic instructions) don't have a type,
but that information is needed so we must add it manually.
This is done via a new G_TYPE instruction.
llvm-svn: 280292
There should be no functional change here, I'm just making the implementation
of "frem" (to libcall) legalization easier for a followup.
llvm-svn: 279987
Matthias Braun