Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
I believe, upon, careful review, that this code causes us to incorrectly
handle exception specifications of copy assignment operators in C++03
mode. However, we currently do not seem to properly implement the subtle
distinction between copying of members and bases made by implicit copy
constructors and assignment operators in C++03 - namely that they are
limited in their overload selection - in all cases. As such, I feel that
committing this code is correct pending a careful review of our
implementation of these semantics.
llvm-svn: 132841
makes it into a special member function. This is very bad and can lead
to all sorts of nastiness including implicit member functions violating
the One Definition Rule. This should probably be made ill-formed in a
later version of the standard, but for now we'll just warn.
llvm-svn: 132104
behind implicit moves. We now correctly identify move constructors and
assignment operators and update bits on the record correctly. Generation
of implicit moves (declarations or definitions) is not yet supported.
llvm-svn: 132080
The general out-of-line case (including explicit instantiation mostly
works except that the definition is being lost somewhere between the AST
and CodeGen, so the definition is never emitted.
llvm-svn: 131933
fixes PR9965, but we're not out of the water yet, as we do not
successfully handle out-of-line definitions, due to my utter
misunderstanding of how we manage templates.
llvm-svn: 131920
Example:
class A { public: int f(); };
class B : public A { private: using A::f; };
class C : public B { private: using B::f; };
Here, B::f is private so this should fail in Standard C++, but because B::f refers to A::f which is public MSVC accepts it.
This fixes 1 error when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 131896
to a warning, since apparently libstdc++'s debug mode does this (and
we can recover safely). Add a Fix-It to insert the "inline", just for kicks.
llvm-svn: 131732
member functions by making sure that they're on the record before
checking for deletion.
Also make sure source locations are valid to avoid crashes.
Unfortunately, the declare-all-implicit-members approach is still
required in order to ensure that dependency loops do not result in
incorrectly deleting functions (since they are to be deleted at the
declaration point per the standard).
Fixes PR9917
llvm-svn: 131520
I hear at least one person crying out in anguish, but it's unfortunately
necessary to avoid infinite loops with mutually dependent constructors
trying to call each other and determine if they are deleted.
It might be possible to go back to the old behavior if we can implement
part-of-file lookups efficiently, or if a solution is discovered by
which we can safely detect and avoid infinite recusion.
llvm-svn: 131515
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
defaulted default constructors.
As it happens, making sure that we handle out-of-line defaulted
functions properly will involved making sure that we actually parse them
correctly, so that's coming after.
llvm-svn: 131224
I've edited one diagnostic which would print "copy constructor" for copy
constructors and "constructor" for any other constructor. If anyone is
extremely enamored with this, it can be reinstated with a simple boolean
flag rather than calling getSpecialMember, which is inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 131143
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
Focus is on default constructors for the time being. Currently the
exception specification and prototype are processed correctly. Codegen
might work but in all likelihood doesn't.
Note that due to an error, out-of-line defaulting of member functions is
currently impossible. It will continue to that until I muster up the
courage to admit that I secretly pray to epimetheus and that I need to
rework the way default gets from Parse -> Sema.
llvm-svn: 131115
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() really really means it now.
Also implement a fun standards bug regarding aggregates. Doug, if you'd
like, I can un-implement that bug if you think it is truly a defect.
The bug is that non-special-member constructors are never considered
user-provided, so the following is an aggregate:
struct foo {
foo(int);
};
It's kind of bad, but the solution isn't obvious - should
struct foo {
foo (int) = delete;
};
be an aggregate or not?
Lastly, add a missing initialization to FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 131101
any names that aren't in the appropriate identifier namespaces. Fixes
an embarrassing bug where we give a redefinition error due to an
Objective-C category (<rdar://problem/9388207>).
llvm-svn: 131036
- New isDefined() function checks for deletedness
- isThisDeclarationADefinition checks for deletedness
- New doesThisDeclarationHaveABody() does what
isThisDeclarationADefinition() used to do
- The IsDeleted bit is not propagated across redeclarations
- isDeleted() now checks the canoncial declaration
- New isDeletedAsWritten() does what it says on the tin.
- isUserProvided() now correct (thanks Richard!)
This fixes the bug that we weren't catching
void foo() = delete;
void foo() {}
as being a redefinition.
llvm-svn: 131013
Explictly defaultedness is correctly reflected on the AST, but there are
no changes to how that affects the definition of functions or much else
really.
llvm-svn: 130974
John McCall