DispatchStage should always delegate to an object of class RegisterFile the task
of updating data dependencies. ReadState and WriteState objects should not be
modified directly by DispatchStage.
This patch also renames stage IS_AVAILABLE to IS_DISPATCHED.
llvm-svn: 353170
Trivial fix: decode was not called for all subprocess.check_output calls.
Commited on behalf of Andrew Boyarshin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57505
llvm-svn: 353168
When Clang/LLVM is built with the CLANG_DEFAULT_STD_CXX CMake macro that sets
the default standard to something other than C++14, there are a number of lit
tests that fail as they rely on the C++14 default.
This patch just adds the language standard option explicitly to such test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57581
llvm-svn: 353163
In some cases, it is faster to just grow the set of 'Users' rather than
performing a llvm::find_if every time a new user is added to
the set. No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 353162
When we attempt to add an addr space qual to a type already
qualified by an addr space ICE is triggered. Before creating
a type with new address space, remove the old addr space.
Fixing PR38614!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57524
llvm-svn: 353160
Some use cases are appearing where salvaging is needed that does not
correspond to an instruction being deleted -- for example an instruction
being sunk, or a Value not being available in a block being isel'd.
Enable more fine grained control over how salavging occurs by splitting
the logic into helper functions, separating things that are specific to
working on DbgVariableIntrinsics from those specific to interpreting IR
and building DIExpressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57696
llvm-svn: 353156
The test started failing for me recently. I don't see any changes around
this code, so maybe it's my local go version that changed or something.
The error seems real to me: we're trying to print an Attribute with %d.
The test talks about "attribute masks" I'm not sure what that refers to,
but I suppose we could print the raw pointer value, since that's
what the test seems to be comparing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57672
llvm-svn: 353155
If we have broadcasts of different vector widths, keep the longest vector width and extract subvectors for the shorter vectors (which should be free).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57663
llvm-svn: 353154
This patch improves code generation for some AArch64 ACLE intrinsics. It adds
support to CGP to duplicate and sink operands to their user, if they can be
folded into a target instruction, like zexts and sub into usubl. It adds a
TargetLowering hook shouldSinkOperands, which looks at the operands of
instructions to see if sinking is profitable.
I decided to add a new target hook, as for the sinking to be profitable,
at least on AArch64, we have to look at multiple operands of an
instruction, instead of looking at the users of a zext for example.
The sinking is done in CGP, because it works around an instruction
selection limitation. If instruction selection is not limited to a
single basic block, this patch should not be needed any longer.
Alternatively this could be done in the LoopSink pass, which tries to
undo LICM for instructions in blocks that are not executed frequently.
Note that we do not force the operands to sink to have a single user,
because we duplicate them before sinking. Therefore this is only
desirable if they really can be done for free. Additionally we could
consider the impact on live ranges later on.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
As for performance, we have internal code that uses intrinsics and can
be speed up by 10% by this change.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57377
llvm-svn: 353152
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
LLVM_ENABLED_PROJECT and reconfigured it had no effect on what
projects were actually built. This was very confusing behaviour. The
reason for this is that the value of the `LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD`
variables are already set.
The problem here is that we have two sources of truth:
* The projects listed in LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS.
* The projects enabled/disabled with LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD.
At configure time we have no real way of knowing which source of truth
the user wants so we apply the following heuristic:
If the user ever sets `LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` in the CMakeCache then that
is used as the single source of truth and we force the
`LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD` CMake cache variables to have the
appropriate values that match the contents of the
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS`. If the user never sets `LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS`
then they can continue to use and set the `LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD`
variables as the "source of truth".
The problem with this approach is that if the user ever tries to use
both `LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` and `LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD` for the same
build directory then any user set value for `LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD`
variables will get overwriten, likely without the user noticing.
Hopefully the above shouldn't matter in practice because the
LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD variables are not documented, but
LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS is.
We should probably deprecate the `LLVM_TOOL_<PROJECT>_BUILD`
variables at some point by turning them into to regular CMake
variables that don't live in the CMake cache.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57535
llvm-svn: 353148
For MinGW, unique partial sections are much more common, e.g.
comdat functions get sections named e.g. text$symbol.
A moderate sized example of this contains over 200K Chunks
which create 174K unique PartialSections. Prior to SVN r352928
(D57574), linking this took around 1,5 seconds for me, while
it afterwards takes around 13 minutes. After this patch, the
linking time is back to what it was before.
The std::find_if in findPartialSection will do a linear scan of
the whole container until a match is found. To use something like
binary_search or the std::set container's own methods, we'd need
to already have a PartialSection*.
Reinstate a proper map instead of having a set with a custom sorting
comparator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57666
llvm-svn: 353146
Summary: The backend used to print the x87 FPSW register as 'fpsw', but gcc inline asm uses 'fpsr'. After D57641, the backend now uses 'fpsr' to match.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57642
llvm-svn: 353142
Summary:
We don't currently map these constraints to physical register numbers so they don't make it to the MachineIR representation of inline assembly.
This could have problems for proper dependency tracking in the machine schedulers though I don't have a test case that shows that.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57641
llvm-svn: 353141
NDK r19 includes a sysroot that can be used directly by the compiler
without creating a standalone toolchain, so we just need a handful
of flags to point Clang there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57733
llvm-svn: 353139
There are several changes:
- Don't stringify Pythonized bools (that's why we're Pythonizing them)
- Support specifying target and sysroot via CMake variables
- Use consistent spelling for --target, --sysroot, --gcc-toolchain
llvm-svn: 353137
When LSR first adds SCEVs to BaseRegs, it only does it if `isZero()` has
returned false. In the end, in invocation of `InsertFormula`, it asserts that
all values there are still not zero constants. However between these two
points, it makes some transformations, in particular extends them to wider
type.
SCEV does not give us guarantee that if `S` is not a constant zero, then
`sext(S)` is also not a constant zero. It might have missed some optimizing
transforms when it was calculating `S` and then made them when it took `sext`.
For example, it may happen if previously optimizing transforms were limited
by depth or somehow else.
This patch adds a bailout when we may end up with a zero SCEV after extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57565
Reviewed By: samparker
llvm-svn: 353136
Summary:
Follow on to D54819/r351476.
We also don't need to perform extra InstCombine pass when we aren't
loading the sample profile in the ThinLTO backend because we have a
flattened sample profile.
Additionally, for consistency and clarity, when we aren't reloading the
sample profile, perform ICP in the same location as non-sample PGO
backends. To this end I have moved the ICP invocation for non-SamplePGO
ThinLTO down into buildModuleSimplificationPipeline (partly addresses
the FIXME where we were previously setting this up).
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57705
llvm-svn: 353135
Summary:
There are a few instructions that all map to the same opcode, so
when disassembling, we have to pick one. That was just the first one
before (the except_ref variant in the case of "call"), now it is the
one marked as IsCanonical in tablegen, or failing that, the shortest
name (which is typically the "canonical" one).
Also introduced a canonical "end" instruction for this purpose.
Reviewers: dschuff, tlively
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, llvm-commits, sunfish
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57713
llvm-svn: 353131
The lack of documentation has been a long standing issue in the Static Analyzer,
and one of the leading reasons behind this was a lack of good documentation
infrastucture.
This lead serious drawbacks, such as
* Not having proper release notes for years
* Not being able to have a sensible auto-generated checker documentations (which
lead to most of them not having any)
* The HTML website that has to updated manually is a chore, and has been
outdated for a long while
* Many design discussions are now hidden in phabricator revisions
This patch implements a new documentation infrastucture using Sphinx, like most
of the other subprojects in LLVM. It transformed some pages as a proof-of-
concept, with many others to follow in later patches. The eventual goal is to
preserve the original website's (https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/) frontpage,
but move everything else to the new format.
Some other ideas, like creating a unipage for each checker (similar to how
clang-tidy works now), are also being discussed.
Patch by Dániel Krupp!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
llvm-svn: 353126
The fewerElementsVectors implementation for load/stores
handles the scalar reduction case just as well, so drop
the redundant code in narrowScalar. This also introduces
support for narrowing irregular size breakdowns for
scalars.
llvm-svn: 353125
Summary:
If the index isn't constant, this transform inserts a multiply and an add on the index to calculating the base pointer for a scalar load. But we still create a memory operand with an offset of 0 and the size of the scalar access. But the access is really to an unknown offset within the original access size.
This can cause the machine scheduler to incorrectly calculate dependencies between this load and other accesses. In the case we saw, there was a 32 byte vector store that was split into two 16 byte stores, one with offset 0 and one with offset 16. The size of the memory operand for both was 16. The scheduler correctly detected the alias with the offset 0 store, but not the offset 16 store.
This patch discards the pointer info so we don't incorrectly detect aliasing. I wasn't sure if we could keep using the original offset and size without risking some other transform on the load changing the size.
I tried to reduce a test case, but there's still a lot of memory operations needed to get the scheduler to do the bad reordering. So it looked pretty fragile to maintain.
Reviewers: efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57616
llvm-svn: 353124
Summary:
When attaching prof metadata to promoted direct calls in SamplePGO
mode, no need to construct and use a SmallVector to pass a single count
to the ArrayRef parameter, we can simply use a brace-enclosed init list.
This made a small but consistent improvement for a ThinLTO backend
compile I was measuring.
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57706
llvm-svn: 353123
Don't handle vector conditions.
I think this can be merged in the future with
fewerElementsVectorSelect, although this becomes slightly tricky with
a vector condition.
llvm-svn: 353122
Try to use the underlying source registers.
This enables legalization in more cases where some irregular
operations are widened and others narrowed.
This seems to make the test_combines_2 AArch64 test worse, since the
MERGE_VALUES has multiple uses. Since this should be required for
legalization, a hasOneUse check is probably inappropriate (or maybe
should only be used if the merge is legal?).
llvm-svn: 353121
Summary:
This is a follow up for https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278. The previous
revision should have also included Kernel ASan.
rdar://problem/40723397
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57711
llvm-svn: 353120
A non-lazy class will be initialized eagerly when the Objective-C runtime is
loaded. This is required for certain system classes which have instances allocated in
non-standard ways, such as the classes for blocks and constant strings.
Adding this attribute is essentially equivalent to providing a trivial
+load method but avoids the (fairly small) load-time overheads associated
with defining and calling such a method.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56555
llvm-svn: 353116
Simon Pilgrim