that have a function/block pointer type
This commit improves the -Wdocumentation warning by making sure that @param and
@returns commands won't trigger warnings when used for fields, variables,
or properties whose type is a function/block pointer type. The
function/block pointer type must be specified directly with the declaration,
and when a typedef is used the warning is still emitted.
In the future we might also want to handle the std::function type as well.
rdar://24978538
llvm-svn: 300981
Emit proper diagnostics when -Wdocumentation is used with constructs such as:
template<typename T>
using fn = int(T aaa, int ccc);
Previously clang wouldn't recognize the function and complain with
'comment that is not attached to a function declaration'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23860
rdar://problem/27300695
llvm-svn: 279754
Give appropriate warnings with -Wdocumentation for @param comments
that refer to function aliases defined with 'using'. Very similar
to typedef's behavior. This does not add support for
TypeAliasTemplateDecl yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23783
rdar://problem/27300695
llvm-svn: 279662
through to the output even if the input comment comes from an untrusted source
Attribute filtering is currently based on a blacklist, which right now includes
all event handler attributes (they contain JavaScipt code). It should be
switched to a whitelist, but going over all of the HTML5 spec requires a
significant amount of time.
llvm-svn: 206882
Remove unneeded member in CommentSema, add a test for the XML schema (the
schema already allowed multiple paragraphs in <ResultDiscussion>, but there
were no tests for that), fix HTML generation (it is not allowed to have <p>
inside <dl>).
llvm-svn: 184652
deprecation attribute ('deprecated', 'availability' or 'unavailable').
This warning is under a separate flag, -Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync, so it
can be turned off easily while leaving other -Wdocumentation warnings on.
llvm-svn: 164467
should be fine to use it without further explanations in the attached
paragraph, so the warning about empty paragraph was turned off for it.
llvm-svn: 163836
analysis registers a command, it becomes a "known" command for the lexer, since
it has an ID. Having this freedom of choice to register a command is a good
thing since BriefParser does not need this.
But the parser should still invoke the correct semantic analysis method
(actOnUnknownCommand) in this case.
llvm-svn: 163646
name. This should reduce the amount of warning false positives about bad HTML
in comments when the comment author intended to put a reference to a template.
This change will also enable us parse the comment as intended in these cases.
Fixes part 1 of PR13374.
llvm-svn: 162407
The reason for the recent fallout for "attaching comments to any redeclaration"
change are two false assumptions:
(1) a RawComment is attached to a single decl (not true for 'typedef struct X *Y'
where we want the comment to be attached to both X and Y);
(2) the whole redeclaration chain has only a single comment (obviously false, the
user can put a separate comment for each redeclaration).
To fix (1) I revert the part of the recent change where a 'Decl*' member was
introduced to RawComment. Now ASTContext has a separate DenseMap for mapping
'Decl*' to 'FullComment*'.
To fix (2) I just removed the test with this assumption. We might not parse
every comment in redecl chain if we already parsed at least one.
llvm-svn: 161878
'templated' declaration for a function or class template to refer to
the function or class template itself, to which the documentation will
be attached. Fixes PR13593.
llvm-svn: 161762
The implementation also includes a Relax NG schema and tests for the schema
itself. The schema is used in c-index-test to verify that XML documents we
produce are valid. In order to do the validation, we add an optional libxml2
dependency for c-index-test.
Credits for CMake part go to Doug Gregor. Credits for Autoconf part go to Eric
Christopher. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 161431
Doxygen manual claims that multiple \brief or \returns commands will be merged
together, but actual behavior is different (second \brief command becomes a
part of a discussion, second \returns becomes a "Returns: blah" paragraph on
its own). Anyway, it seems to be a bad idea to use multiple \brief or \returns
commands in a single command.
llvm-svn: 161325
The only caveat is renumbering CXCommentKind enum for aesthetic reasons -- this
breaks libclang binary compatibility, but should not be a problem since API is
so new.
This also fixes PR13372 as a side-effect.
llvm-svn: 161087
Alex Lorenz