Summary:
Much like with the previous patch (D73005) with `AssumeAlignedAttr`
handling, results in mildly more readable IR,
and will improve test coverage in upcoming patch.
Note that in `AllocAlignAttr`'s case, there is no requirement
for that alignment parameter to end up being an I-C-E.
Reviewers: erichkeane, jdoerfert, hfinkel, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73006
Summary:
This should be mostly NFC - we still lower the same alignment
knowledge to the IR. The main reasoning here is that
this somewhat improves readability of IR like this,
and will improve test coverage in upcoming patch.
Even though the alignment is guaranteed to always be an I-C-E,
we don't always materialize it as llvm's Alignment Attribute because:
1. There may be a non-zero offset
2. We may be sanitizing for alignment
Note that if there already was an IR alignment attribute
on return value, we union them, and thus the alignment
only ever rises.
Also, there is a second relevant clang attribute `AllocAlignAttr`,
so that is why `AbstractAssumeAlignedAttrEmitter` is templated.
Reviewers: erichkeane, jdoerfert, hfinkel, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73005
Summary:
I initially encountered those assertions when trying to create
this IR `alignment` attribute from clang's `__attribute__((assume_aligned(imm)))`,
because until D72994 there is no sanity checking for the value of `imm`.
But even then, we have `llvm::Value::MaximumAlignment` constant (which is `536870912`),
which is enforced for clang attributes, and then there are some other magical constant
(`0x40000000` i.e. `1073741824` i.e. `2 * 536870912`) in
`Attribute::getWithAlignment()`/`AttrBuilder::addAlignmentAttr()`.
I strongly suspect that `0x40000000` is incorrect,
and that also should be `llvm::Value::MaximumAlignment`.
Reviewers: erichkeane, hfinkel, jdoerfert, gchatelet, courbet
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72998
Summary:
`alloc_align` attribute takes parameter number, not the alignment itself,
so given **just** the attribute/function declaration we can't do any
sanity checking for said alignment.
However, at call site, given the actual `Expr` that is passed
into that parameter, we //might// be able to evaluate said `Expr`
as Integer Constant Expression, and perform the sanity checks.
But since there is no requirement for that argument to be an immediate,
we may fail, and that's okay.
However if we did evaluate, we should enforce the same constraints
as with `__builtin_assume_aligned()`/`__attribute__((assume_aligned(imm)))`:
said alignment is a power of two, and is not greater than our magic threshold
Reviewers: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, hfinkel, rsmith, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72996
Summary:
For `__builtin_assume_aligned()`, we do validate that the alignment
is not greater than `536870912` (D68824), but we don't do that for
`__attribute__((assume_aligned(N)))` attribute.
I suspect we should.
Reviewers: erichkeane, aaron.ballman, hfinkel, rsmith, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72994
conduit_uri was renamed to phabricator.uri and git-phab fails to load
.arcconfig without this field.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72960
Summary:
First patch to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization Enablement,
see RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
Always emit !vcall_visibility metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
and not just for -fvirtual-function-elimination. The vcall visibility
metadata will (in a subsequent patch) be used to communicate to WPD
which vtables are safe to devirtualize, and we will optionally convert
the metadata to hidden visibility at link time. Subsequent follow on
patches will help enable this by adding vcall_visibility metadata to the
ThinLTO summaries, and always emit type test intrinsics under
-fwhole-program-vtables (and not just for vtables with hidden
visibility).
In order to do this safely with VFE, since for VFE all vtable loads must
be type checked loads which will no longer be the case, this patch adds
a new "Virtual Function Elim" module flag to communicate to GlobalDCE
whether to perform VFE using the vcall_visibility metadata.
One additional advantage of using the vcall_visibility metadata to drive
more WPD at LTO link time is that we can use the same mechanism to
enable more aggressive VFE at LTO link time as well. The link time
option proposed in the RFC will convert vcall_visibility metadata to
hidden (aka linkage unit visibility), which combined with
-fvirtual-function-elimination will allow it to be done more
aggressively at LTO link time under the same conditions.
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard, evgeny777, steven_wu
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, hiraditya, dexonsmith, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71907
Summary:
LLVMIRIntrinsicGen is using LLVM_Op as the base class for intrinsics.
This works for LLVM intrinsics in the LLVM Dialect, but when we are
trying to convert custom intrinsics that originate from a custom
LLVM dialect (like NVVM or ROCDL) these usually have a different
"cppNamespace" that needs to be applied to these dialect.
These dialect specific characteristics (like "cppNamespace")
are typically organized by creating a custom op (like NVVM_Op or
ROCDL_Op) that passes the correct dialect to the LLVM_OpBase class.
It seems natural to allow LLVMIRIntrinsicGen to take that into
consideration when generating the conversion code from one of these
dialect to a set of target specific intrinsics.
Reviewers: rriddle, andydavis1, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, ftynse
Subscribers: jdoerfert, mehdi_amini, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73233
As explained in Pavel's previous commit message: %lldb is the proper
substitution. Using "lldb" can cause us to execute the system lldb
instead of the one we are testing. This happens at least in standalone
builds.
These functions call relocateOne(). This patch is a prerequisite for
making relocateOne() aware of `Symbol` (D73254).
Reviewed By: grimar, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73250
Calling `operator*` on a WeakVH with a null value yields a null
reference, which is UB. Avoid this by implicitly converting the WeakVH
to a `Value *` rather than dereferencing and then taking the address
for the type conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73280
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
The other 3-op patterns should also be theoretically handled, but
currently there's a bug in the inferred pattern complexity.
I'm not sure what the error handling strategy should be for potential
constant bus violations. I think the correct strategy is to never
produce mixed SGPR and VGPR operands in a typical VOP instruction,
which will trivially avoid them. However, it's possible to still have
hand written MIR (or erroneously transformed code) with these
operands. When these fold, the restriction will be violated. We
currently don't have any verifiers for reg bank legality. For now,
just ignore the restriction.
It might be worth triggering a DAG fallback on verifier error.
If local allocator was declared and used in the allocate clause, it was
not captured in inner region. It leads to a compiler crash, need to
capture the allocator declarator.
Summary:
The primary goal of this refactoring is to separate DWARF optimizing part.
So that it could be reused by linker or by any other client.
There was a thread on llvm-dev discussing the necessity of such a refactoring:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-September/135068.html.
This is a final part from series of patches for dsymutil.
Previous patches : D71068, D71839, D72476. This patch:
1. Creates lib/DWARFLinker interface :
void addObjectFile(DwarfLinkerObjFile &ObjFile);
bool link();
void setOptions;
1. Moves all linking logic from tools/dsymutil/DwarfLinkerForBinary
into lib/DWARFLinker.
2. Renames RelocationManager into AddressesManager.
3. Remarks creation logic moved from separate parallel execution
into object file loading routine.
Testing: it passes "check-all" lit testing. MD5 checksum for clang .dSYM bundle
matches for the dsymutil with/without that patch.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, friss, dblaikie, aprantl, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits, probinson, thegameg
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72915
Summary:
CodeCompletion was not being triggered after successfully parsed
initializer lists, e.g.
```cpp
void foo(int, bool);
void bar() {
foo({1}^, false);
}
```
CodeCompletion would suggest the function foo as an overload candidate up until
the point marked with `^` but after that point we do not trigger signature help
since parsing succeeds.
This patch handles that case by failing in parsing expression lists whenever we
see a codecompletion token, in addition to getting an invalid subexpression.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73177
Summary:
Apparently nobody has tried this in months of development. It turns
out that `FunctionDecl::getBuiltinID` will never consider a function
to be a builtin if it is in C++ and not extern "C". So none of the
function declarations in <arm_mve.h> are recognized as builtins when
clang is compiling in C++ mode: it just emits calls to them as
ordinary functions, which then turn out not to exist at link time.
The trivial fix is to wrap most of arm_mve.h in an extern "C".
Added a test in clang/test/CodeGen/arm-mve-intrinsics which checks
basic functioning of the MVE header file in C++ mode. I've filled it
with copies of existing test functions from other files in that
directory, including a few moderately tricky cases of overloading (in
particular one that relies on the strict-polymorphism attribute added
in D72518).
(I considered making //every// test in that directory compile in both
C and C++ mode and check the code generation was identical. But I
think that would increase testing time by more than the value it adds,
and also update_cc_test_checks gets confused when the output function
name varies between RUN lines.)
Reviewers: LukeGeeson, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, dmgreen
Reviewed By: MarkMurrayARM
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73268
This changes the generated (Instr|Asm|Reg|Regclass)Name tables from this
form:
extern const char HexagonInstrNameData[] = {
/* 0 */ 'G', '_', 'F', 'L', 'O', 'G', '1', '0', 0,
/* 9 */ 'E', 'N', 'D', 'L', 'O', 'O', 'P', '0', 0,
/* 18 */ 'V', '6', '_', 'v', 'd', 'd', '0', 0,
/* 26 */ 'P', 'S', '_', 'v', 'd', 'd', '0', 0,
[...]
};
...to this:
extern const char HexagonInstrNameData[] = {
/* 0 */ "G_FLOG10\0"
/* 9 */ "ENDLOOP0\0"
/* 18 */ "V6_vdd0\0"
/* 26 */ "PS_vdd0\0"
[...]
};
This should make debugging and exploration a lot easier for mortals,
while providing a significant compile-time reduction for common compilers.
To avoid issues with low implementation limits, this is disabled by
default for visual studio or when cross-compiling.
To force output one way or the other, pass
`--long-string-literals=<bool>` to `tablegen`
Reviewers: mstorsjo, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73044
This reverts commit eec36909c1.
This modeling is incorrect. baseAttr is intended for attribute
decorators that are not backed by C++ attribute classes. It essentially
says DerivedAttr isa BaseAttr, which is wrong for ArrayAttr classes.
If one needs to store the element type, it should be stored as a
separate filed in the tablegen class.
Roman Lebedev