Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58217
This change is to remove extraneous and unnecessary ';' from after a function definition, its off by default and carries the same "code modification" warning as some of our other code manipulating changes.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135466
PCH supported for HLSL is added when compile in -cc1 mode using -include-pch for test AST.
This change add some notes about the support of PCH for HLSL.
Reviewed By: beanz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134330
This caused false positives, see comment on the code review.
> When support for copy elision was initially added in e97654b2f2, it
> was taking attributes from a constructor call, although that constructor
> call is actually not involved. It seems more natural to use attributes
> on the function returning the scoped capability, which is where it's
> actually coming from. This would also support a number of interesting
> use cases, like producing different scope kinds without the need for tag
> types, or producing scopes from a private mutex.
>
> Changing the behavior was surprisingly difficult: we were not handling
> CXXConstructorExpr calls like regular calls but instead handled them
> through the DeclStmt they're contained in. This was based on the
> assumption that constructors are basically only called in variable
> declarations (not true because of temporaries), and that variable
> declarations necessitate constructors (not true with C++17 anymore).
>
> Untangling this required separating construction from assigning a
> variable name. When a call produces an object, we use a placeholder
> til::LiteralPtr for `this`, and we collect the call expression and
> placeholder in a map. Later when going through a DeclStmt, we look up
> the call expression and set the placeholder to the new VarDecl.
>
> The change has a couple of nice side effects:
> * We don't miss constructor calls not contained in DeclStmts anymore,
> allowing patterns like
> MutexLock{&mu}, requiresMutex();
> The scoped lock temporary will be destructed at the end of the full
> statement, so it protects the following call without the need for a
> scope, but with the ability to unlock in case of an exception.
> * We support lifetime extension of temporaries. While unusual, one can
> now write
> const MutexLock &scope = MutexLock(&mu);
> and have it behave as expected.
> * Destructors used to be handled in a weird way: since there is no
> expression in the AST for implicit destructor calls, we instead
> provided a made-up DeclRefExpr to the variable being destructed, and
> passed that instead of a CallExpr. Then later in translateAttrExpr
> there was special code that knew that destructor expressions worked a
> bit different.
> * We were producing dummy DeclRefExprs in a number of places, this has
> been eliminated. We now use til::SExprs instead.
>
> Technically this could break existing code, but the current handling
> seems unexpected enough to justify this change.
>
> Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129755
This reverts commit 0041a69495 and the follow-up
warning fix in 83d93d3c11.
Previously we were stripping these normally inherited attributes during
explicit specialization. However for class template member functions
(but not function templates), MSVC keeps the attribute.
This makes Clang match that behavior, and fixes GitHub issue #54717
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135154
When support for copy elision was initially added in e97654b2f2, it
was taking attributes from a constructor call, although that constructor
call is actually not involved. It seems more natural to use attributes
on the function returning the scoped capability, which is where it's
actually coming from. This would also support a number of interesting
use cases, like producing different scope kinds without the need for tag
types, or producing scopes from a private mutex.
Changing the behavior was surprisingly difficult: we were not handling
CXXConstructorExpr calls like regular calls but instead handled them
through the DeclStmt they're contained in. This was based on the
assumption that constructors are basically only called in variable
declarations (not true because of temporaries), and that variable
declarations necessitate constructors (not true with C++17 anymore).
Untangling this required separating construction from assigning a
variable name. When a call produces an object, we use a placeholder
til::LiteralPtr for `this`, and we collect the call expression and
placeholder in a map. Later when going through a DeclStmt, we look up
the call expression and set the placeholder to the new VarDecl.
The change has a couple of nice side effects:
* We don't miss constructor calls not contained in DeclStmts anymore,
allowing patterns like
MutexLock{&mu}, requiresMutex();
The scoped lock temporary will be destructed at the end of the full
statement, so it protects the following call without the need for a
scope, but with the ability to unlock in case of an exception.
* We support lifetime extension of temporaries. While unusual, one can
now write
const MutexLock &scope = MutexLock(&mu);
and have it behave as expected.
* Destructors used to be handled in a weird way: since there is no
expression in the AST for implicit destructor calls, we instead
provided a made-up DeclRefExpr to the variable being destructed, and
passed that instead of a CallExpr. Then later in translateAttrExpr
there was special code that knew that destructor expressions worked a
bit different.
* We were producing dummy DeclRefExprs in a number of places, this has
been eliminated. We now use til::SExprs instead.
Technically this could break existing code, but the current handling
seems unexpected enough to justify this change.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129755
We would issue the same diagnostic twice in the case that the K&R C
function definition is preceded by a static declaration of the function
with a prototype.
Fixes#58181
Adds a fix to the diagnostic of replacing the `= default` to `= delete`
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134549
requires-expression
As reported: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57487
We properly treated a failed instantiation of a concept as a
unsatisified constraint, however, we need to do this at the 'requires
clause' level as well. This ensures that the parameters on a requires
clause that fail instantiation will cause a satisfaction failure.
This patch implements this by running requires parameter clause
instantiation under a SFINAE trap, then stores any such failure as a
requirement failure, so it can be diagnosed later.
D128745 handled DR1432 for the partial ordering of partial specializations, but
missed the handling for the partial ordering of function templates. This patch
implements the latter. While at it, also simplifies the previous implementation to
be more close to the wording without functional changes.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56090
Reviewed By: erichkeane, #clang-language-wg, mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133683
This adds support under AArch64 for the target("..") attributes. The
current parsing is very X86-shaped, this patch attempts to bring it line
with the GCC implementation from
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AArch64-Function-Attributes.html#AArch64-Function-Attributes.
The supported formats are:
- "arch=<arch>" strings, that specify the architecture features for a
function as per the -march=arch+feature option.
- "cpu=<cpu>" strings, that specify the target-cpu and any implied
atributes as per the -mcpu=cpu+feature option.
- "tune=<cpu>" strings, that specify the tune-cpu cpu for a function as
per -mtune.
- "+<feature>", "+no<feature>" enables/disables the specific feature, for
compatibility with GCC target attributes.
- "<feature>", "no-<feature>" enabled/disables the specific feature, for
backward compatibility with previous releases.
To do this, the parsing of target attributes has been moved into
TargetInfo to give the target the opportunity to override the existing
parsing. The only non-aarch64 change should be a minor alteration to the
error message, specifying using "CPU" to describe the cpu, not
"architecture", and the DuplicateArch/Tune from ParsedTargetAttr have
been combined into a single option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133848
Change the default config file loading logic to be more flexible
and more readable at the same time. The new algorithm focuses on four
locations, in order:
1. <triple>-<mode>.cfg using real driver mode
2. <triple>-<mode>.cfg using executable suffix
3. <triple>.cfg + <mode>.cfg using real driver mode
4. <triple>.cfg + <mode>.cfg using executable suffix
This is meant to preserve reasonable level of compatibility with
the existing use, while introducing more flexibility and making the code
simpler. Notably:
1. In this layout, the actual target triple is normally respected,
and e.g. in `-m32` build the `x86_64-*` configs will never be used.
2. Both real driver mode (preferable) and executable suffix are
supported. This permits correctly handling calls with explicit
`--driver-mode=` while at the same time preserving compatibility
with the existing code.
3. The first two locations provide users with the ability to override
configuration per specific target+mode combinaton, while the next two
make it possible to independently specify per-target and per-mode
configuration.
4. All config file locations are applicable independently of whether
clang is started via a prefixed executable, or bare `clang`.
5. If the target is not explicitly specified and the executable prefix
does not name a valid triple, it is used instead of the actual target
triple for backwards compatibility.
This is particularly meant to address Gentoo's use case for
configuration files: to configure the default runtimes (i.e. `-rtlib=`,
`-stdlib=`) and `--gcc-install-dir=` for all the relevant drivers,
as well as to make it more convenient for users to override `-W` flags
to test compatibility with future versions of Clang easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134337
Driver options usually use `Joined` instead of `Separate`. It is also weird that
`--config-system-dir=`/etc exist while `--config=` did not exist.
Reviewed By: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134790
A code block was separated from its release note, so this re-associates
them again. It also adds an example code block to another potentially
breaking change entry.
This implements WG14 N2927 and WG14 N2930, which together define the
feature for typeof and typeof_unqual, which get the type of their
argument as either fully qualified or fully unqualified. The argument
to either operator is either a type name or an expression. If given a
type name, the type information is pulled directly from the given name.
If given an expression, the type information is pulled from the
expression. Recursive use of these operators is allowed and has the
expected behavior (the innermost operator is resolved to a type, and
that's used to resolve the next layer of typeof specifier, until a
fully resolved type is determined.
Note, we already supported typeof in GNU mode as a non-conforming
extension and we are *not* exposing typeof_unqual as a non-conforming
extension in that mode, nor are we exposing typeof or typeof_unqual as
a nonconforming extension in other language modes. The GNU variant of
typeof supports a form where the parentheses are elided from the
operator when given an expression (e.g., typeof 0 i = 12;). When in C2x
mode, we do not support this extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134286
This patch implements P0634r3 that removes the need for 'typename' in certain contexts.
For example,
```
template <typename T>
using foo = T::type; // ok
```
This is also allowed in previous language versions as an extension, because I think it's pretty useful. :)
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847
This eagerly reports use of undef values when passed to noundef
parameters or returned from noundef functions.
This also decreases binary sizes under msan.
To go back to the previous behavior, pass `-fno-sanitize-memory-param-retval`.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134669
Although using-enum's grammar is 'using elaborated-enum-specifier',
the lookup for the enum is ordinary lookup (and not the tagged-type
lookup that normally occurs wth an tagged-type specifier). Thus (a)
we can find typedefs and (b) do not find enum tags hidden by a non-tag
name (the struct stat thing).
This reimplements that part of using-enum handling, to address DR2621,
where clang's behaviour does not match std intent (and other
compilers).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134283
This reverts commit 192d69f7e6.
This fixes the condition to check whether this is a situation where we
are in a recovery-expr'ed concept a little better, so we don't access an
inactive member of a union, which should make the bots happy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542
This reverts commit e3d14bee23.
There are apparently a large number of crashes in libcxx and some JSON
Parser thing, so clearly this has some sort of serious issue. Reverting
so I can take some time to figure out what is going on.
Discovered by reducing a different problem, we currently assert because
we failed to make the constraint expressions not dependent, since a
RecoveryExpr cannot be transformed.
This patch fixes that, and gets reasonably nice diagnostics by
introducing a concept (hah!) of "ContainsErrors" to the Satisfaction
types, which causes us to treat the candidate as non-viable.
However, just making THAT candidate non-viable would result in choosing
the 'next best' canddiate, which can result in awkward errors, where we
start evaluating a candidate that is not intended to be selected.
Because of this, and to make diagnostics more relevant, we now just
cause the entire lookup to result in a 'no-viable-candidates'.
This means we will only emit the list of candidates, rather than any
cascading failures.
Previously we only have an extension that warn void pointer deferencing
in C++, but for C we did nothing.
C2x 6.5.3.2p4 says The unary * operator denotes indirection. If it points
to an object, the result is an lvalue designating the object. However, there
is no way to form an lvalue designating an object of an incomplete type as
6.3.2.1p1 says "an lvalue is an expression (with an object type other than
void)", so the behavior is undefined.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53631
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134461
HLSL uses a variety of named IR metadata and attributes to convey
additional information from the frontend to the backend. This document
tries to capture and document the named annotations to provide a
reference for future contributors.
Reviewed By: python3kgae
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134304
Modifies clang_Cursor_getNumTemplateArguments() and friends to work on
Struct, Class and ClassTemplatePartialSpecialization decls as well as
functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134416
The docs mention that `__builtin_reduce_add` and `__builtin_reduce_mul` support
both integer and floating point element types, but only integer element types
are actually supported. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57847,
and specifically,
00874c48ea/clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp (L2631) for the fact that floating point element types are not supported yet.
Fix the docs to only mention support for integer element types.
This reverts commit 95d94a6775.
This implements the deferred concepts instantiation, which should allow
the libstdc++ ranges to properly compile, and for the CRTP to work for
constrained functions.
Since the last attempt, this has fixed the issues from @wlei and
@mordante.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
This fixes a bunch of FIXME within IsTailPaddedMemberArray related code.
As a side effect, this now also triggers a warning when trying to access a
"struct hack" member with an index above address space index range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133108
One must pick the same name as the one referenced in CodeGenFunction when
generating .inline version of an inline builtin, otherwise they are not
correctly replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134362
Unicode 15.0 adds 4,489 characters, for a total of 149,186 characters.
These additions include 2 new scripts along with 20 new emoji characters,
and 4,193 CJK ideographs.
This changes modify most existing tables including
- XID_Start/XID_Continue in Clang
- The character name database (used by \N{} in Clang)
- The list of formattable/printable codepoints
- The case folding algorithm (which we had not updated since Unicode 9)
- The list of nonspacing/enclosing marks used by the column width
computation algorithm. The rest of the column width algorithm
is not updated.
Reviewed By: tahonermann
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133807
alignments
In the following code, the first element is aligned on a 16-byte
boundary, but the remaining elements aren't:
```
typedef char int8_a16 __attribute__((aligned(16)));
int8_a16 array[4];
```
Currently clang doesn't reject the code, but it should since it can
cause crashes at runtime. This patch also fixes assertion failures in
CodeGen caused by the changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D123649.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133711
Adds a function to check if a method has been deleted by copy-pasting
the existing implementation of clang_CXXMethod_isDefaulted and changing
it to call CXXMethod::isDeleted() instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133924
Support specifying multiple configuration files via multiple `--config`
options. When multiple files are specified, the options from subsequent
files are appended to the options from the initial file.
While at it, remove the incorrect assertion about CfgFileName being
non-empty. It can be empty if `--config ""` is passed, and it makes
sense to report it as non-existing file rather than crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134270
Fix teletype formatting in configuration file documentation to use
double backticks rather than single backticks. Cover some more names
with this formatting. Correct the name of config file for `clang-cl`
invocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134271
When passing arguments with `__fastcall` or `__vectorcall` in 32-bit MSVC, the following arguments have chance to be passed by register if the current one failed. `__regcall` from ICC is on the contrary: https://godbolt.org/z/4MPbzhaMG
All the three calling conversions are not supported in GCC.
Fixes: #57737
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133920
Implement suggested fix for [[ https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2628.html | DR2628. ]] Couldn't update the DR docs because there hasn't been a DR index since it was filed, but the tests still run in CI.
Note: I only transfer the constructor constraints, not the struct constraints. I think that's OK because the struct constraints are the same
for all constructors so they don't affect the overload resolution, and if they deduce to something that doesn't pass the constraints
we catch it anyway. So (hopefully) that should be more efficient without sacrificing correctness.
Closes:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57646https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43829
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134145
Working in a mixed environment of both vscode/vim with a team configured prettier configuration, this can leave clang-format and prettier fighting each other over the formatting of arrays, both simple arrays of elements.
This review aims to add some "control knobs" to the Json formatting in clang-format to help align the two tools so they can be used interchangeably.
This will allow simply arrays `[1, 2, 3]` to remain on a single line but will break those arrays based on context within that array.
Happy to change the name of the option (this is the third name I tried)
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133589
Currently there're two pages that both talk about "Modules" in clang, but
they're different. The one that describes C++ standard modules explicitly
spells out the difference but the other one which targeting Clang modules
doesn't.
This patch adds a link that refers to the C++ standard modules
one in Clang modules doc, as you usually got the later page when
googling. I believe this will make newcomers less confused.
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134105
mydeveloperday