- Quality-of-implementation: Avoid calling __unwrap_iter in constexpr contexts.
The user might conceivably write a contiguous iterator where normal iterator
arithmetic is constexpr-friendly but `std::to_address(it)` isn't.
- Bugfix: When you pass contiguous iterators to `std::copy`, you should get
back your contiguous iterator type, not a raw pointer. That means that
libc++ can't `__unwrap_iter` unless it also does `__rewrap_iter`.
Fortunately, this is implementable.
- Improve test coverage of the new `contiguous_iterator` test iterator.
This catches the bug described above.
- Tests: Stop testing that we can `std::copy` //into// an `input_iterator`.
Our test iterators may currently support that, but it seems nonsensical to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95983
This reverts commit b6ffece320.
The bug is now fixed (it was a stupid cut-and-paste kind of error),
and the regression test added. The new patch is also simpler than the old one!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96084
- Implement C++20's changes to `reverse_iterator`, so that it won't be
accidentally counted as a contiguous iterator in C++20 mode.
- Implement C++20's changes to `move_iterator` as well.
- `move_iterator` should not be contiguous. This fixes a bug where
we optimized `std::copy`-of-move-iterators in an observable way.
Add a regression test for that bugfix.
- Add libcxx tests for `__is_cpp17_contiguous_iterator` of all relevant
standard iterator types. Particularly check that vector::iterator
is still considered contiguous in all C++ modes, even C++03.
After this patch, there continues to be no supported way to write your
own iterator type in C++17-and-earlier such that libc++ will consider it
"contiguous"; however, we now fully support the C++20 approach (in C++20
mode only). If you want user-defined contiguous iterators in C++17-and-earlier,
libc++'s position is "please upgrade to C++20."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94807
This patch is more than just adding the `constexpr` keyword, because
the old code relied on `goto`, and `goto` is not constexpr-friendly.
Refactor to eliminate `goto`, and then mark it as constexpr in C++20.
I freely admit that the name `__nth_element_partloop` is bad;
I couldn't find any better name because I don't really know
what this loop is doing, conceptually. Vice versa, I think
`__nth_element_find_guard` has a decent name.
Now the only one we're still missing from P0879 is `sort`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93557
After this patch, the only parts of P0879 that remain missing will be
std::nth_element, std::sort, and the heap/partial_sort algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93443
Everywhere, normalize the whitespace to `::new (EXPR) T`.
Everywhere, normalize the spelling of the cast to `(void*)EXPR`.
Without the cast to `(void*)`, the expression triggers ADL on GCC.
(I think this is a GCC bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98249)
Even if it doesn't trigger ADL, it still seems incorrect to use any argument
that's not exactly `(void*)` because that opens the possibility of overload
resolution picking a user-defined overload of `operator new`, which would be
wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93153
These had been waiting on the ability to use `std::copy` from
constexpr code (which in turn had been waiting on the ability to
use `is_constant_evaluated()` to switch between `memmove` and non-`memmove`
implementations of `std::copy`). That work landed a while ago,
so these algorithms can all be constexpr in C++20 now.
Simultaneously, update the tests for the set algorithms.
- Use an element type with "equivalent but not identical" values.
- The custom-comparator tests now pass something different from `operator<`.
- Make the constexpr coverage match the non-constexpr coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92255
previously, invocations of std::sort(T**, T**) casted the arguments to
(size_t *). this breaks sorting on systems for which pointers don't fit
in a size_t. change the cast to (uintptr_t *) and add a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92190
Zoe Carver says: "We decided that libc++ only supports C++20 constexpr algorithms
when `is_constant_evaluated` is also supported. Here's a link to the discussion."
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721#inline-735682
Remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED from tests, too.
See Louis's 5911e6a885 if needed to fix bots.
I've applied `UNSUPPORTED: clang-8` preemptively to the altered tests;
I don't know for sure that this was needed, because no clang-8 buildbots
are triggered on pull requests.
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
This patch makes `std::rotate` a constexpr. In doing so, this patch also
updates the internal `__move` and `__move_backward` funtions to be
constexpr.
This patch was previously reverted in ed653184ac because it was missing
some UNSUPPORTED markup for older compilers. This commit adds it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721
cppreference lists the support for this paper as partial.
I found 4 functions which the paper marks as `constexpr`,
but did not use the appropriate macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84275
This patch makes `std::rotate` a constexpr. In doing so, this patch also
updates the internal `__move` and `__move_backward` funtions to be
constexpr.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721
There used to be a workaround where we'd pretend that GCC 5 didn't support
C++14 because it doesn't implement it properly. Since that workaround has
been removed (in 1eb211ada1), we need to mark a few individual tests as
failing with GCC 5.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
This patch adds `_VSTD::` to some calls to `make_pair` inside the
implementations of searchers, to prevent things exploding if there is
a make_pair in an associated namespace of a user-defined type.
https://godbolt.org/z/xAFG98
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72640
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
These algorithms require a ForwardIterator or better. Ensure
we diagnose the contract violation at compile time instead of
of silently doing the wrong thing.
Further algorithms will be audited in upcoming patches.
llvm-svn: 340426
Arthur O'Dwyer